-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07-0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2
> patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that
> over here at big purple, but we do ... and its a PITA. I'm
Hi,
On 23/05/2012, at 11:11 PM, Pete French wrote:
> Am posting this to stable not really as a question, but more in case anyone
> else hits the same problem. Last patch tuesday one of my virtual Windows
> machines running under VirtualBox started crashing. By which I mean
> that VirtualBox woul
Hi, thanks for reporting!
> However, the video mode isn't restored. I have my console set to
> VGA_80x60 and the resume seems to set it up "wrong". I get half or so
> of each line displayed.
>
> A vidcontrol VGA_80x60 restores things to proper working order.
>
> Is there a shortcoming somewhere
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:46:03PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm toying with the SMP/i386 ACPI suspend/resume patches in -9. Thanks
> so much for this!
Note that enough of those patches have been committed (at least as of
r235891) that I was able to perform suspend/resume properly on m
Hi,
I'm toying with the SMP/i386 ACPI suspend/resume patches in -9. Thanks
so much for this!
I've noticed though that the video backlight stays off after resume. A
common problem on -9, so I set hw.acpi.reset_video=1. That restores
the backlight.
However, the video mode isn't restored. I have my
On 05/24/12 19:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:47:30PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 05/24/12 16:59, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
I'll get the patch to jail(8) in - thanks for catching that. But I
wonder about the patc
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:47:30PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> On 05/24/12 16:59, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> >>I'll get the patch to jail(8) in - thanks for catching that. But I
> >>wonder about the patch to /etc/rc.d/jail. It looks co
On 05/24/12 16:59, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
I'll get the patch to jail(8) in - thanks for catching that. But I
wonder about the patch to /etc/rc.d/jail. It looks correct, but I'm
going to see if it's /etc/rc.d/jail that needs changing, o
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Sean Bruno wrote:
Probably doing something wrong, but when I install tkcvs to get tkdiff
on my box, the only thing it does is fire up and display a "wish"
window.
Did I do it wrong? :-)
No idea, but devel/diffuse might be alternative.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:46:52PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> I'll get the patch to jail(8) in - thanks for catching that. But I
> wonder about the patch to /etc/rc.d/jail. It looks correct, but I'm
> going to see if it's /etc/rc.d/jail that needs changing, or if my recent
> changes to jail(8) h
On 05/24/12 16:30, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:20:15PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 00:13 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:06:50PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:20:15PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 00:13 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:06:50PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:18:54PM -0400, M
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 18:20 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> I do not see a link to your jail rc.d script, just the patch.
>
Sigh, sorry, it's been a long day. I didnt look at the patch :P It works
perfectly now, thanks again, hope someone can commit this soon.
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 00:13 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:06:50PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:18:54PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Latest 9-STABLE has
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:06:50PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:18:54PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Latest 9-STABLE has introduced some changes that break the ezjail rc
> > > script. On b
On 05/24/12 15:06, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Sorry, I was going too fast.
> uname -a
FreeBSD P9X79.tddhome 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #2: Fri May 11
20:41:54 PDT 2012 tomdean@P9X79.tddhome:/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Tom Dean
___
freebsd-stable@fr
On 05/24/12 15:06, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
root@jail.local:~# cat /var/run/jail_app.id
/etc/rc: WARNING: $hostname is not set -- see rc.conf(5).
Hostname is set in /etc/rc.conf.
I had this same issue - see my post on jails
Rebooting the
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 23:22 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:18:54PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Latest 9-STABLE has introduced some changes that break the ezjail rc
> > script. On bootup it fails to start, but when i log in via ssh and
> > manually start
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:18:54PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Latest 9-STABLE has introduced some changes that break the ezjail rc
> script. On bootup it fails to start, but when i log in via ssh and
> manually start it, it works. However i am unable to shut them down
> afterwards.
>
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:14 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:07 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2
> > patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that
> > over here at big purple, but we do ... an
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:07 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2
> patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that
> over here at big purple, but we do ... and its a PITA. I'm bisecting to
> find out what is going on.
>
Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2
patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that
over here at big purple, but we do ... and its a PITA. I'm bisecting to
find out what is going on.
test:
VARIABLE="$(uname)"
bash: command substitution: line 3: s
Hello,
Latest 9-STABLE has introduced some changes that break the ezjail rc
script. On bootup it fails to start, but when i log in via ssh and
manually start it, it works. However i am unable to shut them down
afterwards.
root@jail.local:~# uname -a
FreeBSD jail.local 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STAB
Probably doing something wrong, but when I install tkcvs to get tkdiff
on my box, the only thing it does is fire up and display a "wish"
window.
Did I do it wrong? :-)
sean
pkg_info |grep ^tk
tk-8.5.11 Graphical toolkit for Tcl
tk-wrapper-1.1_1Shell wrapper for wish (Tk)
tkcvs-8.2
Script started on Thu May 24 19:25:44 2012
op has logged on :0 from local.
root has logged on ttyv1 from local.
ESC[1mopESC[m@ESC[4mopnESC[24m ~> gdb sleep ^M
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
> Can you please file a PR? Having broken AIO and ZFS would be .. bad.
OK: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=168298
I thought it was most likely a bug in VirtualBox to be honest - broken
AIO and ZFS would be bad, but also highly noticeable in other
configurations, and this only seems to
26 matches
Mail list logo
