Re: x11/nvidia-driver: crash with FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 when module loaded via /boot/loader.conf

2012-01-03 Thread Denise H. G.
On 2012/01/03 at 18:15, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > On one of my FreeBSD 9.0 boxes running FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (CLANG > built), equipted with a nVidia GT760Ti graphics board, loading the > nvidia module via /boot/loader.conf results in a page fault with random > error messages before rebooting

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-01-03 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-04 00:31:01 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-04 00:31:01 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-04 00:31:02 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-04 00:31:33 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-04 00:31:33

Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-01-03 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:53:46AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca > TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for > powerpc/powerpc > TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - cleaning the object tree > TB ---

Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-01-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
(mav@, powerpc@, stable@, SuperBisquit BCCed) On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:31:15PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote: >> I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment. > > What relevancy does that have to the situation?  

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-01-03 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:42 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:42 - /

Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-01-03 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:31:15PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote: > I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment. What relevancy does that have to the situation? We're seeing the same for other architectures, not just powerpc. 4516 01/02 21:53 FreeBSD Tinderbox (

Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-01-03 Thread Super Bisquit
I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment. On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:15 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-01-02 22:07:52 - tinderbox 2.8 running on > freebsd-stable.sentex.ca > TB --- 2012-01-02 22:07:52 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for > powerpc/power

Re: FreeBSD at Amazon EC2 status

2012-01-03 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 09:07 -0800, Alexandre Biancalana wrote: > Hi lists, > > What´s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is > this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page > (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there´s no > active development on that. > >

FreeBSD at Amazon EC2 status

2012-01-03 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Hi lists, What´s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there´s no active development on that. Does someone running production workload with FreeBSD on EC2 ? I'm interested

Re: x11/nvidia-driver: crash with FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 when module loaded via /boot/loader.conf

2012-01-03 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
03.01.2012 12:15, O. Hartmann wrote: On one of my FreeBSD 9.0 boxes running FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (CLANG built), equipted with a nVidia GT760Ti graphics board, loading the nvidia module via /boot/loader.conf results in a page fault with random error messages before rebooting. 9-STABLE, amd64

Re: x11/nvidia-driver: crash with FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 when module loaded via /boot/loader.conf

2012-01-03 Thread O. Hartmann
On 01/03/12 13:11, Christian Gusenbauer wrote: > Hi Oliver! > > I'm using stable/9 and amd64 setup, too, but I do not experience such page > faults as you do. I've an older GeForce 7600 GT card and I'm using driver > 285.05.09 - neither OS nor driver built with clang. Perhaps it's a clang > iss

Re: x11/nvidia-driver: crash with FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 when module loaded via /boot/loader.conf

2012-01-03 Thread Christian Gusenbauer
Hi Oliver! I'm using stable/9 and amd64 setup, too, but I do not experience such page faults as you do. I've an older GeForce 7600 GT card and I'm using driver 285.05.09 - neither OS nor driver built with clang. Perhaps it's a clang issue? Ciao, Christian. On Tuesday 03 January 2012 11:15:20

Re: Performance problems with pagedaemon

2012-01-03 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, there's some effort to improve tuning(7). If somone could go over to http://wiki.freebsd.org/SystemTuning and add some sentences, it will make the life of other people maybe a little bit more easy Bye, Alexander. -- Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic an

x11/nvidia-driver: crash with FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 when module loaded via /boot/loader.conf

2012-01-03 Thread O. Hartmann
On one of my FreeBSD 9.0 boxes running FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (CLANG built), equipted with a nVidia GT760Ti graphics board, loading the nvidia module via /boot/loader.conf results in a page fault with random error messages before rebooting. Booting the box without the nvidia.ko module loaded in

Re: Performance problems with pagedaemon

2012-01-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:17:11AM -0800, Artem Belevich wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: >> >> Mysql uses more than 20G of RAM. You may want to tune it down a bit so >> that there is a bit of free RAM

Re: Performance problems with pagedaemon

2012-01-03 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:17:11AM -0800, Artem Belevich wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > Mysql uses more than 20G of RAM. You may want to tune it down a bit so > that there is a bit of free RAM around. > > Page daemon is trying to maintain v_free_target + v_