Re: (Possible fix for sbp(4)) Re: Comment out sbp driver from GENERIC

2011-10-19 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Alberto Villa wrote this message on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 14:12 +0200: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek > wrote: > > Commenting a driver out is almost always a bad idea and should > > be done as a last step. > > Well, few weeks prior to -RELEASE can be considered a last step.

Re: booting 8.2 on Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4

2011-10-19 Thread perryh
nickolas...@gmail.com wrote: > > - try to fiddle with relevant settings in BIOS ... > You've fogot about BIOS SATA/IDE setting. Try to play with it. That's arguably one of the "relevant settings in BIOS" :) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: booting 8.2 on Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4

2011-10-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:11:35PM +0200, V?clav Zeman wrote: > On 10/19/2011 06:26 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:17:58 +0200 > > V?clav Zeman wrote: > > > >> I am having problems booting the FreeBSD 8.2 CD image on > >> GA-790XTA-UD4(rev. 1.0). The last thing that I can

Re: booting 8.2 on Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4

2011-10-19 Thread Václav Zeman
On 10/19/2011 06:26 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:17:58 +0200 > Václav Zeman wrote: > >> I am having problems booting the FreeBSD 8.2 CD image on >> GA-790XTA-UD4(rev. 1.0). The last thing that I can see is "BIOS drive A: >> is disk0". Is this completely not supported? Ca

Re: booting 8.2 on Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4

2011-10-19 Thread nickolasbug
>> I am having problems booting the FreeBSD 8.2 CD image on >> GA-790XTA-UD4(rev. 1.0). The last thing that I can see is "BIOS drive A: >> is disk0". Is this completely not supported? Can I do anything to >> install FreeBSD on such box? > > Have you done the usual stuff? > - if not running the late

Re: Call for testers : ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller

2011-10-19 Thread Marco Steinbach
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 19.10.2011 20:43: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:09:41PM +0200, Marco Steinbach wrote: YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 17.10.2011 02:22: Hi, If you have ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller please try the patch at the following URL and let me know how it works. http://people.fre

Re: Call for testers : ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller

2011-10-19 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:50:10AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:43:17AM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > Thanks for testing! > > I already got a feedback from user and the user also said the patch > > does not work. I'm trying to debug the issue as the user is willing

Re: Call for testers : ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller

2011-10-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:43:17AM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > Thanks for testing! > I already got a feedback from user and the user also said the patch > does not work. I'm trying to debug the issue as the user is willing > to provide remote access. However it seems it's somewhat hard for > the

Re: Call for testers : ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller

2011-10-19 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:09:41PM +0200, Marco Steinbach wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 17.10.2011 02:22: > >Hi, > > > >If you have ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller please try the > >patch at the following URL and let me know how it works. > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/dc/dc.uli56

Re: booting 8.2 on Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4

2011-10-19 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:17:58 +0200 Václav Zeman wrote: > I am having problems booting the FreeBSD 8.2 CD image on > GA-790XTA-UD4(rev. 1.0). The last thing that I can see is "BIOS drive A: > is disk0". Is this completely not supported? Can I do anything to > install FreeBSD on such box? Have

Re: Call for testers : ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller

2011-10-19 Thread Marco Steinbach
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 17.10.2011 02:22: Hi, If you have ALi/ULi M5261/M5263 ethernet controller please try the patch at the following URL and let me know how it works. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/dc/dc.uli562x.diff The patch was generated against latest HEAD and it should be cleanly ap