On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:30:17AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
> then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba.
>
> We're talking transfer rates of say 50kbytes/s here, and I'm the only
> c
Hello list,
I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba.
We're talking transfer rates of say 50kbytes/s here, and I'm the only
client on the box.
I've seen here and there discussions about sendfile's s
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> Almost certainly Samba, but there is little-to-nothing one can do about
> it. If you want to verify it's Samba, enable ftpd on your system and do
> FTP transfers instead (do both a GET and a PUT for testing speed in both
> directions).
>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:41:06AM +0100, Henner Heck wrote:
>
> Here are my testresults:
>
> *Disabling sendfile in smb.conf *(no patching yet)
> - free memory drops to 570M and stays there
> - copy speed from share 75MB/s, CPU load 50%
> (why not 100% and higher speed?)
See below.
> *Patc
Here are my testresults:
*Disabling sendfile in smb.conf *(no patching yet)
- free memory drops to 570M and stays there
- copy speed from share 75MB/s, CPU load 50%
(why not 100% and higher speed?)
*Patched kernel with patch 218795*
- without sendfile
Copying works.
- with sendfile
Anyone in net and stable that wants it, limits blocked it, so send me
personal email and I'll send to you.
Jack
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Here is the 7.2.2 tarball. IMPORTANT: if you use this DO NOT try and put it
>
> into your kernel source tree, it will break that.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:16:37 -0600, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
> Hmm, wasn't the issues with 3T drives, that they internally use
> 4K blocks and emulate 512 and that therefore 8 block alignments
> are an performance issue ?
Hi guys,
I'd just like to jump on this train real quick since I have
Hi,
How can we get 7.2.2. version of if_em driver ?
I wanna test it.
I can help you for testing changes to em drivers.
Regards,
Ozkan KIRIK
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Lev Serebryakov
wrote:
> Hello, Mike.
> You wrote 23 февраля 2011 г., 14:16:28:
>
>>> Driver from "em driver, 82574L
Hello, Mike.
You wrote 23 февраля 2011 г., 14:16:28:
>> Driver from "em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM" thread
>> doesn't help, really: it seems, that it decrease frequincy of hangs,
> Looking at your sysctl output, you are not using the test drivers posted
> in that thread.
Yes, as i
On 2/23/2011 4:16 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Driver from "em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM" thread
> doesn't help, really: it seems, that it decrease frequincy of hangs,
Looking at your sysctl output, you are not using the test drivers posted
in that thread.
>>> sysctl dev.em.0
dev
Hello, Freebsd-net.
It's me again, as problem is not solved and no "clear" answer was
received.
em0 NIC on my storage server hangs every several (2-3) days.
Symptoms are simple: no packets can be send, mbufs are overfilled, "No
buf space to send" error for any program.
Configuration now
Pete French wrote:
> > Why may it hurt ? How may it hurt ? Which sector is written to
> > by this 'gpart' command ?
> >
> > As far as I understand, GPT writes some stuff at the beginning
> > and the end of the harddisk.
>
> Yup, this is true.
>
> > How/why will the newfs overwrite those parts ?
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
