On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/12/2010 01:44 Pete French said the following:
> >> Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
> >
> > ...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
>
> That's exactly the reason why I said "unless t
Quoth Pete French on Monday, 06 December 2010:
> > Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
>
> ...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
>
> > Because few thousand other people do not seem to be as lucky:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~edwin/gna
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:52:25PM +, Pete French wrote:
> > This problem has been reported many times in the past and almost
> > certainly has nothing to do with 8.x. Here's a thread about the matter
> > where a user states the same as you but about 7.1:
> >
> > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mail
> This problem may be a reverse problem of this PR:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138789
>
> In other words, your virtual CD-ROM reads correct TOC from mounted
> image but block size is wrong? Maybe old umass(4) corrects this case
> heuristicly but the new USB stack doesn't?
Mi
on 07/12/2010 01:46 Pete French said the following:
> So, I just gave the 8.1 CD a try - which didnt take nearly as long as
> anticipated. End result is that it also fails to insall. Pr
> filed as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152874
BTW, that error message is produced by sysinstall o
On Monday 06 December 2010 06:46 pm, Pete French wrote:
> So, I just gave the 8.1 CD a try - which didnt take nearly as long
> as anticipated. End result is that it also fails to insall. Pr
> filed as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152874
>
> Am wndering if this could be due to the chan
on 07/12/2010 01:44 Pete French said the following:
>> Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
>
> ...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
That's exactly the reason why I said "unless the reporter also actively pursues
it" :-)
Because as my e
> This problem has been reported many times in the past and almost
> certainly has nothing to do with 8.x. Here's a thread about the matter
> where a user states the same as you but about 7.1:
>
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-10/msg00307.html
I found that - it ap
So, I just gave the 8.1 CD a try - which didnt take nearly as long as
anticipated. End result is that it also fails to insall. Pr
filed as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152874
Am wndering if this could be due to the change in the USB stack
somehow though - I have a feeling that iLO pr
> Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
> Because few thousand other people do not seem to be as lucky:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~edwin/gnats/gnats-openpercategorycummulative.html
ah, not good gra
on 07/12/2010 01:27 Pete French said the following:
> Actually my expereice of filing PR's has been pretty positive over the
> years. Am a bit surprised you feel this way. Investigating and posting
> here also generates reseults, but I do like to tag them onto a PR in
> the end, just so they dont g
> Basically if it feels like you are the first one to report the problem, then,
> unfortunately, the onus is on you...
Sure, I've been around here long enough to know this - was just trying to see
if anyone else knew about it, as it takes so long to boot over the network
that I really didn't want
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:51:36PM +, Pete French wrote:
> Trying to re-install a set of HP servers over the iLO, and every time
> I tried to install the 8.1 CD I ended up with an error message
> telling me that the CD looked more like an audio CD than a FreeBSD
> distibution.
>
> I ouzzled ov
on 07/12/2010 00:51 Pete French said the following:
> Trying to re-install a set of HP servers over the iLO, and every time
> I tried to install the 8.1 CD I ended up with an error message
> telling me that the CD looked more like an audio CD than a FreeBSD
> distibution.
>
> I ouzzled over it a b
Trying to re-install a set of HP servers over the iLO, and every time
I tried to install the 8.1 CD I ended up with an error message
telling me that the CD looked more like an audio CD than a FreeBSD
distibution.
I ouzzled over it a bit, and then remembered that I originally installed
these machin
Anybody has any ideas? At the beginning, I guess it's caused by some
software. After seen it many times in my log, I found that it appears
whenever I want to use the sound card. If you don't use the sound card for a
long time (like 10mins), the next time you use it will cause this warning
message.
On 2010-Nov-28 02:24:21 -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> Since all the boinc processes are running at i31, why are they impacting
>> a buildkernel that runs with 0 nicety?
>
>With the setup you presented you're going to have a lot of context s
on 06/12/2010 16:59 Alexander Leidinger said the following:
> I do not think it is trivial. The amount of discussion around this does not
> makes
> me want to do a MFC.
Sorry, I must have missed the discussion.
Could you please clarify what is not trivial in this case?
The change itself seems to
on 06/12/2010 07:20 per...@pluto.rain.com said the following:
> Would there be some fundamental problem in changing MSGBUF_SIZE
> from a compiled-in constant to a tunable that could be set at the
> loader prompt? (I'm _not_ suggesting that it be adjustable while
> the system is running.)
>
> The
Quoting Artem Belevich (from Sun, 5 Dec 2010
12:27:00 -0800):
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
By the way, in order for this to work one would need r207057 applied
to -8. Any chance that could be MFC'ed?
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=207057
There's two unloved buglets that as far as I can see haven't been
resolved so far in 8-STABLE, but which would be nice to squeeze into
8.2-RELEASE.
Could some kind committer/releng type please take a look at them -
pretty please?
conf/144842: [ip6] ipv6_default_interface causes route complai
On Sat 2010-11-27 (15:22), Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in
> a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's
Ok I did some science, it looks like the array doesn't like me
throwing zeros at the disk when it's 'offline'. If I take
On 06.12.2010 13:15, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> It seems it was broken with r209469.
>>
>
> Something as simple as what Yue is trying to do could/should be done with
> gpart.
> But boot0cfg has some additional features...
boot0cfg is already doing this via gpart's ioctl interface.
AFAIR, there is ye
on 06/12/2010 08:48 Andrey V. Elsukov said the following:
> On 06.12.2010 3:37, Yue Wu wrote:
>> Thanks, I remembered that boot0cfg in the previous version can do it
>> without changing the sysctl parameter, maybe it's changed in newer
>> version.
>
> It seems it was broken with r209469.
>
Somet
24 matches
Mail list logo
