> The problem is mbuf resources, the driver is autoconfiguring the number of
> queues based on the number of cores, on newer systems with lots of them
> this is outstripping the mbuf resource pool.
That would make sense, as these systems have 16 cores (dual E5520's).
> I have decided to hard li
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>
>>On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>>> I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on
8.1-STABLE(r213395) thr
The problem is mbuf resources, the driver is autoconfiguring the number of
queues based on the number of cores, on newer systems with lots of them
this is outstripping the mbuf resource pool.
I have decided to hard limit the queues to 8, you can fix the number
manually
by searching for num_queues
I've run across a strange problem with the igb driver in 8-STABLE - when
I try to do anything with the second igb interface, I get one or more "igb1:
Could not setup receive structures" error messages.
This can be reproduced as simply as booting in single-user mode with an
empty /boot/loader.
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:07:48 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> But I classify this problem as high/severe because it makes a mess of
> things at the worst time possible -- situations where you absolutely
> need reliable output due to the nature of the problem you're dealing
> with (debugging a kerne
on 14/10/2010 15:07 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:17:58 -0700
>> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> There isn't a 100% reliable way to get rid of this problem. I've been
>>> harping about this for year
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:17:58 -0700
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > There isn't a 100% reliable way to get rid of this problem. I've been
> > harping about this for years (sorry to sound like a jerk, but this
> > really is a majo
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:17:58 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> There isn't a 100% reliable way to get rid of this problem. I've been
> harping about this for years (sorry to sound like a jerk, but this
> really is a major problem that keeps coming up and annoys users/admins
> to no end.
Or the pro
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on
8.1-STABLE(r213395) through the
>> use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do an sshfs mount
a
On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on 8.1-STABLE(r213395)
through the
use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do an sshfs mount as such:
#sshfs usern...@hostname:/home/username local_mountpoint/
This mounts the rem
10 matches
Mail list logo
