Something interesting I've come across which happens on both RELENG_7
and RELENG_8 (indicating it's not a problem with the older tty code or
the newer pty/pts code), and it's reproducible on Linux (sort of...).
mysqld_safe appears to hold a pty/tty open even after the process has
been backgrounded
For awhile now, my home server has been acting up. Actually it had a bad
set of RAM long ago, replaced and it and worked fine. It's been weird again
now, and I've found this in dmesg:
MCA: Bank 0, Status 0xf2000800
MCA: Global Cap 0x0806, Status 0x
MCA: Vendor
on 30/09/2010 02:27 Don Lewis said the following:
> On 29 Sep, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 29/09/2010 11:56 Don Lewis said the following:
>>> I'm using the same kernel config as the one on a slower !SMP box which
>>> I'm trying to squeeze as much performance out of as possible. My kernel
>>> config
on 30/09/2010 01:27 Jurgen Weber said the following:
> Gentlemen
>
> Ah, ok. Learn something new everyday. Fantastic. The first time the machine
> stopped during the boot process, but that is ok the 2nd time we have success.
>
> http://pastebin.com/r4UWdN7U
>
> I am not sure if ACPI is on, Jerem
On 9/29/2010 3:57 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
can do.
The system is now running:
# zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive storage/compressed/bacula
Try piping
On 29 Sep, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/09/2010 11:56 Don Lewis said the following:
>> I'm using the same kernel config as the one on a slower !SMP box which
>> I'm trying to squeeze as much performance out of as possible. My kernel
>> config file contains these statements:
>> nooptions
Gentlemen
Ah, ok. Learn something new everyday. Fantastic. The first time the
machine stopped during the boot process, but that is ok the 2nd time we
have success.
http://pastebin.com/r4UWdN7U
I am not sure if ACPI is on, Jeremy you mention below that it should be
in just by booting with th
on 30/09/2010 00:51 Jurgen Weber said the following:
> Hi
>
> I do not understand what you mean by a verbose dmesg.. looking at the man
> page there is no verbose option for dmesg except what I completed (dmesg -a).
>
> Once that is clarified I can reboot the backup machine and turn on ACPI
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 07:51:49AM +1000, Jurgen Weber wrote:
> I do not understand what you mean by a verbose dmesg.. looking
> at the man page there is no verbose option for dmesg except what I
> completed (dmesg -a).
>
> Once that is clarified I can reboot the backup machine and turn on
>
Hi
I do not understand what you mean by a verbose dmesg.. looking at
the man page there is no verbose option for dmesg except what I
completed (dmesg -a).
Once that is clarified I can reboot the backup machine and turn on ACPI
for you.
Thanks
On 29/09/10 5:26 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I do not understand what you mean by a verbose dmesg.. looking at
the man page there is no verbose option for dmesg except what I
completed (dmesg -a).
Once that is clarified I can reboot the backup machine and turn on ACPI
for you.
On 29/09/10 5:29 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, S
Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Jim Bryant wrote:
i have two laptops, both are Compaq(HP) C300 series using the
motherboards with the 945GM chipset and using T7200 and T7600 Core2
Duos.
One (this one) has an intel pro wireless 3945ABG installed, which
returns:
wpi0: irq 18 at de
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
> can do.
>
> The system is now running:
>
> # zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive storage/compressed/bacula
Try piping zfs data through mbuffer (misc/mbuffe
It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
can do.
The system is now running:
# zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive storage/compressed/bacula
All the drives are ATA-8 SATA 2.x device
from systat:
1 usersLoad 0.36 0.58 0.57 S
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:24:21PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:57:53AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >> Is prime95 testing running stable after waking from sleep?
>
> Yes, 0 errors, 0 warnings.
>
> > The Thinkpad hardware he's on is """old""
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:16:13AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:57:53AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >>
> >> I doubt repeated coincidences. :-) Is prime95 testing running stable
> >> after waking from sleep?
> >
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:57:53AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> Is prime95 testing running stable after waking from sleep?
Yes, 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> The Thinkpad hardware he's on is """old""" (note the quotes), so I
> wouldn't be surprised if the CPU (Intel Pentium M)
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:57:53AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> > The test run for 17 hours without any problems (or MCA messages),
>
> That part is good. At least starting from normal operation, your laptop is
> running stably under
Hi--
On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> The test run for 17 hours without any problems (or MCA messages),
That part is good. At least starting from normal operation, your laptop is
running stably under load
> then I put the laptop for a 5 minute sleep, resumed the test, a
Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> MCA: Bank 1, Status 0xe20001f5
>> MCA: Global Cap 0x0005, Status 0x
>> MCA: Vendor "GenuineIntel", ID 0x695, APIC ID 0
>> MCA: CPU 0 UNCOR PCC OVER DCACHE L1 ??? error
>
> That is very likely to be a matter of luck. If I translate thi
Hi all,
I've been working on updating my semi-embedded images to
7.3-stable of late (I generally wait for .3+ releases), it's been a
few years since the last time I did one of these and I'm having some
issues getting my netboot test environment to behave itself.
I'm sure it's something si
on 29/09/2010 11:56 Don Lewis said the following:
> I'm using the same kernel config as the one on a slower !SMP box which
> I'm trying to squeeze as much performance out of as possible. My kernel
> config file contains these statements:
> nooptions SMP
> nodeviceapic
>
On 29 Sep, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/09/2010 00:11 Don Lewis said the following:
>> On 28 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>>
>>> % vmstat -i
>>> interrupt total rate
>>> irq0: clk 60683442 1000
>>> irq1: atkbd0 6
on 29/09/2010 00:11 Don Lewis said the following:
> On 28 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>
>> % vmstat -i
>> interrupt total rate
>> irq0: clk 60683442 1000
>> irq1: atkbd0 6 0
>> irq8: rtc
On 29 Sep, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:39:49AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Sep, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>> > Given all the information here, in addition to the other portion of the
>> > thread (indicating ntpd reports extreme offset between the system clock
>> > and
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:39:49AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Sep, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > Given all the information here, in addition to the other portion of the
> > thread (indicating ntpd reports extreme offset between the system clock
> > and its stratum 1 source), I would say the mo
On 29 Sep, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Given all the information here, in addition to the other portion of the
> thread (indicating ntpd reports extreme offset between the system clock
> and its stratum 1 source), I would say the motherboard is faulty or
> there is a system device which is behaving b
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:49:39PM +1000, Jurgen Weber wrote:
> Andriy
>
> You can find everything you are after here:
>
> http://pastebin.com/WH4V2W0F
The information provided here shows ACPI is disabled in addition to the
boot not being verbose.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick
on 29/09/2010 06:49 Jurgen Weber said the following:
> Andriy
>
> You can find everything you are after here:
>
> http://pastebin.com/WH4V2W0F
Looks like this was with ACPI disabled?
Can you try to re-enable it?
Also, it doesn't look like the dmesg is verbose.
> On 28/09/10 8:07 PM, Andriy Gap
on 29/09/2010 03:38 Artem Belevich said the following:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> BTW, have you seen my posts about UMA and ZFS on hackers@ ?
>> I found it advantageous to use UMA for ZFS I/O buffers, but only after
>> reducing
>> size of per-CPU caches for the zone
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:59:04PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:12:00PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>we are using fetch command from cron to run PHP scripts periodically
> >>and sometimes cron sends error e-mails like this:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:31:27PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 28 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> > Looking at the timestamps of things and comparing to my logs, I
> > discovered that the last instance of ntp instability happened when I was
> > running "make index" in /usr/ports. I tried it again with
32 matches
Mail list logo
