On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:40 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 July 2010 01:31 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 14/07/2010 17:14 Oliver Fromme said the following:
> > > In a machine installed yesterday, 8.1-PRERELEASE doesn't
> > > seem to detect the number of CPU packages vs. cores per
> >
on 15/07/2010 00:40 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> It's funny that I actually wrote a convenience script (and cleaned up
> today):
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/cpu_topology-12212009.sh
>
> BTW, current topology detection code is not optimal for some Intel
> processors if my memory ser
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 01:31 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/07/2010 17:14 Oliver Fromme said the following:
> > In a machine installed yesterday, 8.1-PRERELEASE doesn't
> > seem to detect the number of CPU packages vs. cores per
> >
> > package correctly:
> > | FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE-20100713
I had similar issue with 8-RELEASE and cyrus-sasl2 with cyrus-saslauthd linked
against system kerberos.
(uname -a xxx.xxx.xxx 8.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p3 #1: Sat Jun 12 00:39:22 EEST 2010
r...@xxx.xxx.xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WWW i386)
The problem manifested itself with pretty much
George Mamalakis wrote:
Unfortunately I have no time this week. I will be able to look at it
and send you a quick howto for openldap/cyrus/heimdal on Saturday. If
somebody else is able to do it sooner, it would be great. Please,
install it on i386 image, since amd64 didn't seem to have any prob
Joerg Pulz wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
Dear All,
I have a problem: ldapsearch results in "Segmentation fault" under
openldap-2.4.23 with cyrus-sasl-2.1.23.
[...]
Dear Henrik,
just a guess from my side.
You said, that you installed and configured Kerberos from p
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:10:25PM +0200, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
I have a problem: ldapsearch results in "Segmentation fault" under
openldap-2.4.23 with cyrus-sasl-2.1.23.
[...]
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
If I was to build a test box from scratch, can you tell me how to set up
all the nece
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:49:10PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
> On 20 July 2009 01:52, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > So I wanted to use an usb key on this freshly updated 7-stable box,
> > and got a panic just after plugging it in: :(
> >
> > zsh triton# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel.symbols /var/cra
on 14/07/2010 17:14 Oliver Fromme said the following:
> In a machine installed yesterday, 8.1-PRERELEASE doesn't
> seem to detect the number of CPU packages vs. cores per
> package correctly:
>
> | FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE-20100713 #0: Tue Jul 13 19:51:18 UTC 2010
> | [...]
> | CPU: Intel(R) Xeon
On 20 July 2009 01:52, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So I wanted to use an usb key on this freshly updated 7-stable box,
> and got a panic just after plugging it in: :(
>
> zsh triton# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel.symbols /var/crash/vmcore.9
> ...
> umass0: on uhub5
> umass0:1:0:-1: Attached to scbu
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Can you also provide the output of "acpidump -dt"? This will probably
> be quite long (possibly 300KB or more), so you may want to put it up on
> the web somewhere.
http://www.secnetix.de/olli/tmp/acpidump-dt.txt
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix Gm
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:44:05PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> pluknet wrote:
> > On 14 July 2010 18:14, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > In a machine installed yesterday, 8.1-PRERELEASE doesn't
> > > seem to detect the number of CPU packages vs. cores per
> > > package correctly:
> > >
> > >
pluknet wrote:
> On 14 July 2010 18:14, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > In a machine installed yesterday, 8.1-PRERELEASE doesn't
> > seem to detect the number of CPU packages vs. cores per
> > package correctly:
> >
> > | FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE-20100713 #0: Tue Jul 13 19:51:18 UTC 2010
> > | [
On 14 July 2010 18:14, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> In a machine installed yesterday, 8.1-PRERELEASE doesn't
> seem to detect the number of CPU packages vs. cores per
> package correctly:
>
> | FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE-20100713 #0: Tue Jul 13 19:51:18 UTC 2010
> | [...]
> | CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
Dear All,
I have a problem: ldapsearch results in "Segmentation fault" under
openldap-2.4.23 with cyrus-sasl-2.1.23.
A thread for similar issues was started by George Mamalakis back in february:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/
In a machine installed yesterday, 8.1-PRERELEASE doesn't
seem to detect the number of CPU packages vs. cores per
package correctly:
| FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE-20100713 #0: Tue Jul 13 19:51:18 UTC 2010
| [...]
| CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5408 @ 2.13GHz (2133.42-MHz K8-class
CPU)
|
On 14/7/2010 12:32 μμ, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:56:57AM +0300, George Mamalakis wrote:
On 14/7/2010 11:42 πμ, Reko Turja wrote:
I have a problem: ldapsearch results in "Segmentation fault" under
openldap-2.4.23 with cyrus-sasl-2.1.23
A thread for similar issu
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:56:57AM +0300, George Mamalakis wrote:
> On 14/7/2010 11:42 πμ, Reko Turja wrote:
> >>>I have a problem: ldapsearch results in "Segmentation fault" under
> >>>openldap-2.4.23 with cyrus-sasl-2.1.23
> >>>
> >>>A thread for similar issues was started by George Mamalakis bac
On 14/7/2010 11:42 πμ, Reko Turja wrote:
I have a problem: ldapsearch results in "Segmentation fault" under
openldap-2.4.23 with cyrus-sasl-2.1.23
A thread for similar issues was started by George Mamalakis back in
february:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-February/055017.
I have a problem: ldapsearch results in "Segmentation fault" under
openldap-2.4.23 with cyrus-sasl-2.1.23
A thread for similar issues was started by George Mamalakis back in
february:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-February/055017.html
but I find no solution / conclusion f
20 matches
Mail list logo
