On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:06:11PM +0200, Olaf Seibert wrote:
> On Thu 27 May 2010 at 10:42:11 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Olaf Seibert wrote:
> > > Here is the output of netstat -m while the problem was going on:
> > >
> > > 25751/1774/27525 mbufs in
Am 04.06.10 01:51, schrieb Xin LI:
> On 2010/06/03 16:24, Thomas wrote:
>> Hello
>
>> I tryed to use crunchgen. It's not working for me. I always get a
>> NFS4ACL error.
>
>> r...@bert:/usr/src/release/i386# crunchgen boot_crunch.conf
>> Run "make -f boot_crunch.mk" to build crunched binary.
>
>
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:06:11 +0200 Olaf Seibert wrote:
OS> I do get the impression there is a mbuf leak somehow. On a much older
OS> file server (FreeBSD 6.1, serves a bit of NFS but has no ZFS) the mbuf
OS> cluster useage is much lower, despite a longer uptime:
OS> 256/634/890/25600 mbuf
On Thu 27 May 2010 at 10:42:11 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Olaf Seibert wrote:
> > Here is the output of netstat -m while the problem was going on:
> >
> > 25751/1774/27525 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
> > 24985/615/25600/25600 mbuf clusters in us
