Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-03-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> portmaster -r png- > > Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just > have missed it in the docs). > > I would have used > >  portmaster -r graphics/png

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-03-28 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png Ari -- --> Aristedes Maniatis ish http://www.ish.com

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-03-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
> >  If you use portmaster: > >        portmaster -r jpeg- > >  If you use portupgrade: > >        portupgrade -fr graphics/jpeg The text has been updated: 20100328: AFFECTS: users of graphics/png AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org The png library has been updated to versi

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-03-28 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong date, wrong text, wrong instructions for portmaster. 20090328: A

Re: Powerd and est / eist functionality

2010-03-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:42:02PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > I'll see if I can find a very high resolution photo of your motherboard > and try to work out if any ASICs are used for H/W monitoring (these days > such chips also often provide Super I/O support (floppy, LPT, COM, > LPC/ISA, etc.)

Re: Powerd and est / eist functionality

2010-03-28 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:16:27AM -0700, John Long wrote: > At 05:42 PM 3/27/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > put this in > # Intel Core/Core2Duo CPU temperature monitoring driver > device coretemp coretemp(4) will get you the temperatures of each processor core, provided via the dev.cpu.X.tempe

USB UPS detached and cannot reattach ("could not allocate new device")

2010-03-28 Thread James Seward
Hello, On my 8.0-RELEASE machine running GENERIC this happened this afternoon: Mar 28 17:48:13 yomi apcupsd[969]: UPS Self Test switch to battery. Mar 28 17:48:17 yomi kernel: ugen0.2: at usbus0 (disconnected) Mar 28 17:48:18 yomi kernel: usb_alloc_device:1586: set address 2 failed (USB_ERR_STAL

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-03-28 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:56:34 +0200 Tobias Roth wrote: > On 3/28/10 3:38 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands > > ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA > > is 6-7 April. > > > > The first on

Re: random FreeBSD panics

2010-03-28 Thread Ivan Voras
On 28 March 2010 16:42, Masoom Shaikh wrote: > lets assume if this is h/w problem, then how can other OSes overcome > this ? is there a way to make FreeBSD ignore this as well, let it > result in reasonable performance penalty. Very probably, if only we could detect where the problem is. Try add

Re: random FreeBSD panics

2010-03-28 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Masoom Shaikh wrote: > nopes, this didn't help too, machine freezed again after using for 30 > minutes or so > all it was doing is playing amarok, fetching sources from svn repos, > and using firefox > > lets assume if this is h/w problem, then how can other OSes o

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-03-28 Thread Tobias Roth
On 3/28/10 3:38 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. > > The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib > version bump)

Re: random FreeBSD panics

2010-03-28 Thread Masoom Shaikh
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 28 March 2010 13:18, Masoom Shaikh wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> Masoom Shaikh wrote: Hello List, I was a happy FreeBSD user, just before I installed FreeBSD8.0-RC1. Since then,

[ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010-03-28 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
Hi, As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 April. The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. We do _NOT_ recommend upda

Re: NFS lockd problem

2010-03-28 Thread Ronald Klop
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:08:26 +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote: Outset: 1 NFS server (with lockd) 2 NFS client (with lockd) The clients serve several jails with apache, whose data (www) resides on the server From time to time everything seem to freeze. Then, after one minute or so, the system

Re: NFS lockd problem

2010-03-28 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:50:17 +0200, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:08 AM, Giulio Ferro wrote: Outset: 1 NFS server (with lockd) 2 NFS client (with lockd) The clients serve several jails with apache, whose data (www) resides on the server If you need file locking to work reliabl

Fwd: random FreeBSD panics

2010-03-28 Thread Masoom Shaikh
-- Forwarded message -- From: Masoom Shaikh Date: Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:28 AM Subject: random FreeBSD panics To: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions Hello List, I was a happy FreeBSD user, just before I installed FreeBSD8.0-RC1. Since then, system randomly just free

Re: Powerd and est / eist functionality

2010-03-28 Thread John Long
At 05:42 PM 3/27/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:51:49PM -0700, John Long wrote: >> At 02:14 AM 3/26/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> % dmesg | grep -i smbus >> pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > >All this means is that there's a SMBus-class device sitting on the