On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote:
In Message-Id: <4ba294f7.4030...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
On 03/16/10 00:04, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 03/15/10 18:30, Matthew Fleming wrote:
Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a
crash
on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:18, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
In Message-Id: <20100320001820.ga92...@icarus.home.lan>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 07:50:24PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 17-3-2010 9:27, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
sharenfs does work in fre
on 09/02/2010 14:53 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 09/02/2010 12:32 Matthew D. Fuller said the following:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 04:37:50PM +1030 I heard the voice of
>> Daniel O'Connor, and lo! it spake thus:
>>> Probably the result of idiotic penny pinching though :-/
>> Irritating. O
As M. Warner Losh wrote:
> I'd like to know what causes this, if possible.
One more datapoint, don't know whether it's related or not.
I've got a cardbus ethernet card around (a Xircom one), which it is
normally used in a different machine. When I insert it into the
TP600, I get:
cardbus1: Una
As M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > Does this happen on a cold boot or a warm boot?
> :
> : That doesn't matter.
> Bummer. I'll have to look at the original data a little more
> closely. I'd like to know what causes this, if possible.
OK, I could insert any printf you'd like me to. I could perhap
In message: <20100320134517.go52...@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Joerg Wunsch writes:
: As M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > : I guess vgapci0 doesn't really use interrupts, so this leaves cbb0/1
: > : and uhci0 sharing an interrupt. Apparently, the interrupt storm at
: > : cbb gets detected correct
As M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : I guess vgapci0 doesn't really use interrupts, so this leaves cbb0/1
> : and uhci0 sharing an interrupt. Apparently, the interrupt storm at
> : cbb gets detected correctly as long as at least another device
> : installs an interrupt handler on irq 11.
> Does this hap
In message: <20100320115528.ga50...@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Joerg Wunsch writes:
: As Joerg Wunsch wrote:
:
: > OK, at kernel #11 :), I can now say it's the USB subsystem. Just
: > leaving "device usb" (and also "device uhci") in makes it work.
: >
: > So the question appears to be why k
On 20-3-2010 0:50, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Just wondering, is this using the base nfsd/mountd, or is there some
in-kernel nfs code strictly for zfs? I haven't found much info on the
share* options in the manpage or wiki.
There's also the complete ZFS manual you should read:
http://dlc.
As Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> OK, at kernel #11 :), I can now say it's the USB subsystem. Just
> leaving "device usb" (and also "device uhci") in makes it work.
>
> So the question appears to be why keeping the USB driver in makes the
> interrupt storm detection work...
Maybe that's the relationship
On 19/03/2010 12:35, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> ...
>
> My wpi problems are more severe.
>
> I recently purchased a new battery for my notebook and to improve
> my battery uptime I deactivated the bluetooth device in the BIOS
> (HP6510b).
>
> Ever since the wlan connection is less reliable. ...
E
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Gary Gatten wrote:
> It MAY make a big diff, but make sure during your tests you use unique files
> or flush the cache or you'll me testing cache speed and not disk speed.
Yeah I did make sure to use unique files for testing the effects of
prefetch. This is Atom
Your email client cannot read this email.
To view it online, please go here:
http://s239803596.onlinehome.us/display.php?M=636993&C=0b459cda02907b70810620c649b053e6&S=52&L=35&N=32
To stop receiving these
emails:http://s239803596.onlinehome.us/unsubscribe.php?M=636993&C=0b459cda02907b70810620c649
13 matches
Mail list logo
