[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-03-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-02 06:36:21 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-02 06:36:21 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-03-02 06:36:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-02 06:36:41 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-02 06:36:41 - /usr/b

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-03-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-02 06:12:42 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-02 06:12:42 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-03-02 06:12:42 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-02 06:13:04 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-02 06:13:04 - /usr/b

Re: Fatal Trap with NAT and 8.0-STABLE

2010-03-01 Thread Adam Vande More
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Luiz Gustavo < luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br> wrote: > Hi guys.. > > I'm having trouble configuring NAT on a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE. > > where the active pf or ipfw (ipfw add nat ...) I get a message "FATAL > TRAP" (url of the image below) > > http://www.luizgustavo.p

Fatal Trap with NAT and 8.0-STABLE

2010-03-01 Thread Luiz Gustavo
Hi guys.. I'm having trouble configuring NAT on a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE. where the active pf or ipfw (ipfw add nat ...) I get a message "FATAL TRAP" (url of the image below) http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nat_problem_8.png someone help me? i have one freebsd with spe

Re: gptzfsboot dell r510 fails

2010-03-01 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 03/02/10 01:56, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: For my next attempt, I'm going to try to move the ssds to slots 6,7 so the boot devices are '0,1' which I know should work. This actually works. That leads me to believe that the vdev probes in zfsload.c are not quite right. Or its finding them inc

gptzfsboot dell r510 fails

2010-03-01 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Hi All, Dell r510 24GB RAM 8 disks in the following order 0-1 - 25gb ssd sas 2-7 - 136gb sas http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/8...@203057 which does not include http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=199714 so following http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/RAIDZ2 [

[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-03-01 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-01 21:31:46 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-01 21:31:46 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-03-01 21:31:46 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-01 21:31:59 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-01 21:31:59 -

Re: Cannot write to nfsv4 share

2010-03-01 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, al...@ulgsm.ru wrote: try to mount /exp/distfiles ]>mount /exp/distfiles ]> try to write ]>touch /exp/distfiles/t touch: /exp/distfiles/t: Permission denied ls and read files ok. When writes fail for me, it's usually a uid, gid vs user/group name mapping problem. D

Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?

2010-03-01 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I concur. Everything in my network is now on TCP, and there is no mbuf leakage. I just don't get over the 5500 mark, no matter what I throw at it. I do feel that TCP is not as well performing on a local net with Linux, hence the choice for UDP. But

Re: stable-8 regression: time stands still

2010-03-01 Thread Ronald Klop
Hi Ruben, Some shots in the dark. - Do you run powerd? Try to disable it. - What is your output of 'sysctl kern.timecounter'? Maybe try setting another timecounter. - Maybe you shouldn't name your computer 'ill child' in french. :-) Ronald. On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:14:41 +0100, Ruben de Groot

Re: ipfw & natd with recent MFC of firewall_coscripts functionality

2010-03-01 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:25:54PM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:24:54PM +0300, hizel wrote: > > Hi. Similar problem. Now updated to 7.3-PRERELEASE. rc script natd said he > > did not know parameter quietstart. Now migrate to use kernel nat. > > I was able to confirm tha

Re: ipfw & natd with recent MFC of firewall_coscripts functionality

2010-03-01 Thread Bob Willcox
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:24:54PM +0300, hizel wrote: > Hi. Similar problem. Now updated to 7.3-PRERELEASE. rc script natd said he > did not know parameter quietstart. Now migrate to use kernel nat. I was able to confirm that simply changing "quietstart" and "quietstop" in the /etc/rc.d/ipfw sc

Re: stable-8 regression: time stands still

2010-03-01 Thread Ruben de Groot
Forgot to mention. The kernel is GENERIC + IPFIREWALL* and IPDIVERT options; nothing else. I also build a RELEASE_8_0 kernel and it shows the same problems, so it's not just a recent -stable issue. On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:34:50PM +0100, Ruben de Groot typed: > > Hi, > > After upgrading my 7.

stable-8 regression: time stands still

2010-03-01 Thread Ruben de Groot
Hi, After upgrading my 7.2-PRERELEASE system to 8-stable I encountered some very strange problems, most obvious: - startup would hang on starting devd, only continuing after a ^C - reboot would hang, but reboot -q would work. - nfs clients would report strange locking problems. Now I've found

Re: 8.0 on new hardware and a few errors, should I be worried?

2010-03-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday 27 February 2010 8:28:48 pm Dan Naumov wrote: > Hello > > I've very recently finished installing 8.0-RELEASE on some new > hardware and I noticed a few error messages that make me a bit uneasy. > This is a snip from my dmesg: > > -- > ac

Re: ZFS and sh(1) panic: spin lock [lock addr] (smp rendezvous) held by [sh(1) proc tid] too long

2010-03-01 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: > 2010/1/27 Brandon Gooch : >> The machine, a Dell Optiplex 755, has been locking up recently. The >> situation usually occurs while using VirtualBox (running a 64-bit >> Windows 7 instance) and doing anything else in another xterm (such as >> re

ipfw & natd with recent MFC of firewall_coscripts functionality

2010-03-01 Thread hizel
Hi. Similar problem. Now updated to 7.3-PRERELEASE. rc script natd said he did not know parameter quietstart. Now migrate to use kernel nat. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscr

Re: mbuf leakage with nfs

2010-03-01 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:52:32 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs: WJW> > In my case it is the Linux client causing the problems (cannot tell WJW> > yet if it is only with udp, but I would think so). If I understand WJW> > Daniel correctly his latest testes were perform

Re: trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode on 8.0-RELEASE (possibly bge(4) related)

2010-03-01 Thread Dmitry Rybin
Broadcom 5714 5715 - no problems. 2010/2/22 Denis Lamanov : > Yes, PCIX BCM5704 > FreeBSD vpn2 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1 r204028: Thu Feb 18 08:29:42 > EET 2010     ad...@vpn2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386 > > 2010/2/22 Pyun YongHyeon > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:17:17PM +0200, Den

Re: mbuf leakage with nfs

2010-03-01 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 28-2-2010 18:55, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:21:28 + "Robert N. M. Watson" wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? : RNMW> It's almost certainly one or a small number of very specific RPCs RNMW> that are triggering it -- maybe OpenBSD does an extra lookup, or RNMW> s

mount_newnfs & mount_nullfs problem.

2010-03-01 Thread George Mamalakis
Dear all, In short: If I export the filesystem /export/homes, and mount it through nfsv4 on a fbsd8-stable box in the folder /mnt, and then use mount_nullfs /mnt/ /path1/path2/path3, then I have the following-wrong behaviour. If I use vi /path1/path2/path3/mamalos/newfile to write a file, the