On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Is this documented somewhere?
>
Here:
http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/FreeBSD-diskless.html
Whoever wrote that, thank you.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Howdy,
I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network. I've got
my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested all three
services from this host before attemptin
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:28:03PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Howdy,
I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network.
I've got my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested
all three services from this host before a
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:30, mattjreimer@ wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:49 PM, jhell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is funny that you guys are all of a sudden talking about this, as I was
just working on some modifications to the arc_summary.pl script for some
bette
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network. I've got
> my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested all three
> services from this host before attempting to boot over the network.
>
> pxeboo
Xorg.log after:
#killall xdm
#kldunload radeon
#dmesg:
info: [drm] Resetting GPU
vgapci0: child drm0 requested pci_disable_busmaster
info: [drm] MSI released
drm0: detached
Warning: memory type drm_bufs leaked memory on destroy (2 allocations, 64 bytes
leaked).
drm0: on vgapci0
#kldload radeon
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:11:36PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The NFS root mount you see happening later is a result of the root
> filesystem not being available. This is normal if mfsroot fails.
A follow-up to my own post:
The above paragraph is incorrect. The NFS root mount is proper,
ex
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:28:03PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network.
> I've got my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested
> all three services from this host before attempting to boot over the
> network.
Howdy,
I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network. I've
got my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested all three
services from this host before attempting to boot over the network.
pxeboot seems to work, and I see it get loaded via tftp. The kernel
boo
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:05:11AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Overall, Barry's script makes an excellent proof-of-concept - which is
> what he was offering.
You know, I had a verbose in-line response typed up, agreeing with some
points of yours and disagreeing with others (with perlfaq and other
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
> Which one might be "better" on pool that will consist of 6 disks:
>
> 6x raidz2
> or
> 2 stripes of 3 disks in raidz?
>
> It should provide slightly less reliability (still allows for 2 disks to be
> off the array at a time) but the latter s
On 2010-Feb-16 09:59:46 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:06:43AM -0600, Barry Pederson wrote:
>> maybe something like this tacked on the end of the script (excuse my
>> Perl, I'm a Python guy).
>>
>>
>> Loader Settings #
>> open(LOADER, '/boot/loader
http://blogs.sun.com/ahl/entry/double_parity_raid_z
Looks like raidz2 is recommended for better protection against failures than
2 stripes.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Peter C. Lai wrote:
> Which one might be "better" on pool that will consist of 6 disks:
>
> 6x raidz2
>
> or
>
> 2 stripes
Which one might be "better" on pool that will consist of 6 disks:
6x raidz2
or
2 stripes of 3 disks in raidz?
It should provide slightly less reliability (still allows for 2 disks to be
off the array at a time) but the latter should improve reads since a given
read only has to touch 3 spindles
On Tue, February 16, 2010 2:05 pm, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Wed, February 10, 2010 10:00 pm, Bruce Simpson wrote:
>>> On 02/10/10 19:40, Steve Polyack wrote:
I haven't had such bad experience as the above, but it is certainly a
concern. Using ZFS we simply 'off
Dan Langille wrote:
> On Wed, February 10, 2010 10:00 pm, Bruce Simpson wrote:
>> On 02/10/10 19:40, Steve Polyack wrote:
>>> I haven't had such bad experience as the above, but it is certainly a
>>> concern. Using ZFS we simply 'offline' the device, pull, replace with
>>> a new one, glabel, and z
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:49 PM, jhell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It is funny that you guys are all of a sudden talking about this, as I was
> just working on some modifications to the arc_summary.pl script for some
> better formatting and inclusion of kmem stati
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:06:43AM -0600, Barry Pederson wrote:
> On 2/15/10 7:49 PM, jhell wrote:
>
> >As I make final modifications to the script I will keep the below URLs
> >updated and welcome any bug reports or modification requests to me
> >personally.
> >
> >Here is the URLs:
> >http://jhe
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:04:58AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote:
> I'm having repeated kernel panic issues on 8.0-RELEASE/amd64. Can anyone
> shed light on the below error? I unfortunately cannot provide a proper crash
> dump. The pointer addresses are always the same. The only other thing I've
> notic
On 2/15/10 7:49 PM, jhell wrote:
As I make final modifications to the script I will keep the below URLs
updated and welcome any bug reports or modification requests to me
personally.
Here is the URLs:
http://jhell.googlecode.com/files/arc_summary.pl
http://jhell.googlecode.com/files/arc_summary
On 2010-02-15 10:29:22PM +0100, Gót András wrote:
> On Hét, Február 15, 2010 10:15 pm, Dan Naumov wrote:
> >>> A C2Q CPU makes little sense right now from a performance POV. For
> >>> the price of that C2Q CPU + LGA775 board you can get an i5 750 CPU and
> >>> a 1156 socket motherboard that will ru
On 2010-02-15 02:25:57PM -0800, Artem Belevich wrote:
> > How much ram are you running with?
>
> 8GB on amd64. kmem_size=16G, zfs.arc_max=6G
>
> > In a latest test with 8.0-R on i386 with 2GB of ram, an install to a ZFS
> > root *will* panic the kernel with kmem_size too small with default
> > se
on 15/02/2010 00:24 Peter Jeremy said the following:
> On 2010-Feb-05 00:40:24 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I came up with some things with which you can try to experiment:
>>
>> 1. Boot with hw.pci.usb_early_takeover="0" in loader.conf.
>>
>> 2. Comment out the following line in sys/dev/usb/cont
On 2/16/2010 6:28 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
[...]
Why even bother with the LSI card at all?
That board already has 6 SATA slots - depends how many disks you want
to use of course. (5 HDs + 1 DVD drive?)
Plus two SATA drives in a gmirror for the
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:38 +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> > I don't know, but I plan to test that scenario in a few days.
> >
> > Matt
>
> Please share the results when you're done, I am really curious :)
>
>
> > It *should* work... I made changes a while back that allow for multiple
> > vdevs to a
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I have my backup storage machine booted from USB stick (as read-only
> UFS) with 4x 1TB HDDs in RAIDZ. It is running one and half year
> without problem.
Yeah, I am booting off a 4Gb CF card with adapter (I didn't trust the
BIOS enough for USB :)
I
Dan Langille wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
[...]
Why even bother with the LSI card at all?
That board already has 6 SATA slots - depends how many disks you want
to use of course. (5 HDs + 1 DVD drive?)
Plus two SATA drives in a gmirror for the base OS, and one optical. I
want a minimum of 8
Hello,
I was wondering if there were any plans with regards to the bug
mentioned in kern/115623
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/115623)?
FreeBSD 7.3-PRERELEASE (haven't tried RC1 yet, pulling the sources down
now via cvsup) doesn't work with the card until the patch included i
Oh, I'm sorry for bothering you all, guys.
I commented out vga instead of agp.
:)
2010/2/16 Nikolay Tychina
> Hi.
>
> I csupped RELENG_8, buildworld succeeded, but buildkernel fails. Any ideas
> what is going wrong here?
>
>
> MAKE=make sh /usr/home/nicholas/example/usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
Hi.
I csupped RELENG_8, buildworld succeeded, but buildkernel fails. Any ideas
what is going wrong here?
MAKE=make sh /usr/home/nicholas/example/usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh LETTUCE
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpo
Quoting jhell (from Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:49:38 -0500):
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:20, 000.fbsd@ wrote:
I think you are referring to this script:
http://cuddletech.com/arc_summary/
and its FreeBSD version
http://bitbucket.org/koie/arc_summary/changeset/dbe14d2cf52b/
Another useful script is arc
> Packet #9: client --> server: client requests TCP connection close (FIN+ACK)
> Packet #10: server --> client: server sends ACK
>
> Packet #11: server --> client: server announces TCP window size of 0,
> indicating TCP receive buffers are exhausted and that the
> client sho
> I don't know, but I plan to test that scenario in a few days.
>
> Matt
Please share the results when you're done, I am really curious :)
> It *should* work... I made changes a while back that allow for multiple
> vdevs to attach to the root. In this case you should have 3 mirror
> vdevs attac
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, jfar...@goldsword.com wrote:
>
> Just out of curiousity, would not an older server like this:
> http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?InvtId=DL145-5R (~$75 + shipping) or
> http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=DL360-6R&cat=SYS (~$190 + shipping)
>
> be a reasonable option? Unl
34 matches
Mail list logo
