Re: if_bge upload stalls repeatedly (Was: 8-STABLE outgoing scp stalling frequently)

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:25:03PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:52:55AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:36:16AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've

Re: if_bge upload stalls repeatedly (Was: 8-STABLE outgoing scp stalling frequently)

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:52:55AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:36:16AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've noticed that on a recent 8-STABLE/amd64, scp(1) appears to be > > > stalling

Re: if_bge upload stalls repeatedly (Was: 8-STABLE outgoing scp stalling frequently)

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:36:16AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've noticed that on a recent 8-STABLE/amd64, scp(1) appears to be > > stalling very frequently. This is the output from a "scp -v -v" > > of a 300Mb file

messages output starts getting interleaved

Hello. After migrating to 8.0-STABLE from 7.2-STABLE my messages output starts getting interleaved (see below). I'm running amd64 smp kernel. Is there anything can be done to get rid of this? Thanks in advance. Feb 3 19:44:49 tiger named[989]: running Feb 3 19:44:50 tiger ntpd[1179]: ntpd 4

Re: bsnmpd returns incorrect hrProcessorLoad values

En/na Mikolaj Golub ha escrit: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:37:52 +0100 Gustau Pérez wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> I'm using cacti to monitor some servers running FBSD. I was using 7.2 >> with SCHED_4BSD. With this configuration : bsnmpd+bsnmp-ucd was >> returning right values for the cores' load. >>

Re: Inmutable bit in some binaries

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:33:15PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > HI all, > > I'm hardening one test box and at present I'm planning to do: > > # chflags -R schg > > where will be some binaries that seems to be common targets > for rootkits and lammers: > > ls > du > ps > find > top > l

Inmutable bit in some binaries

HI all, I'm hardening one test box and at present I'm planning to do: # chflags -R schg where will be some binaries that seems to be common targets for rootkits and lammers: ls du ps find top locate strings ifconfig netstat login I wonder if changing these files permissions as I've shown

Re: ionice in FreeBSD?

On 02/03/2010 12:12 PM, Bruce Simpson wrote: On 02/02/2010 17:19, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not to I/O. That's not entirely true. A thread's CPU priority

Re: ionice in FreeBSD?

On 02/02/2010 17:19, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not to I/O. That's not entirely true. A thread's CPU priority is still going to affect its ability to be

Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance

Dan Naumov wrote: > [j...@atombsd ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/jago/test2 bs=1M count=4096 > 4096+0 records in > 4096+0 records out > 4294967296 bytes transferred in 143.878615 secs (29851325 bytes/sec) > > This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and > 4GB in 143.8 second

Re: nmi_calltrap in siopoll()

kern/143521 2010/2/2 pluknet : > Hi. > > I've got NMI on an almost idle system - FreeBSD 7.2-R amd64. > I guess the reason may be in (hardware?) binary garbage > seen once in a while on serial port (loader, then ttyd0). > Ask me for more details. > > Tracing command swi4: clock sio pid 20 tid 1000