32-bit jails on a 64-bit system?

2010-01-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
Howdy, I saw this little tidbit in the 8.0 Release Notes... The jail(8) subsystem has been updated. Changes include: Compatibility support which permits 32-bit jail binaries to be used on 64-bit systems to manage jails has been added. I know prior to 8.0 with some fancy footwork yo

Re: bge panic in 8.0

2010-01-20 Thread Erik Klavon
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:42:08PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:12:51PM -0800, Erik Klavon wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:26:18PM -0800, Erik Klavon wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 06:06:40PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 05:47

Re: bge panic in 8.0

2010-01-20 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:12:51PM -0800, Erik Klavon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:26:18PM -0800, Erik Klavon wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 06:06:40PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 05:47:19PM -0800, Erik Klavon wrote: > > > > One of my amd64 machines running

Re: bge panic in 8.0

2010-01-20 Thread Erik Klavon
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:26:18PM -0800, Erik Klavon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 06:06:40PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 05:47:19PM -0800, Erik Klavon wrote: > > > One of my amd64 machines running 8.0p1 acting as a NAT system for many > > > network clients dropped

Re: About nice(1), renice(8) and ULE scheduler

2010-01-20 Thread Jordi Espasa Clofent
In fact nice is a very simple program. It only changes the priority value of a process in a POSIX-compliant way. There is no need to change or adapt it; it still works fine in the SMP world and with new schedulers. It's up to the scheduler to interpret and handle the priority values of processes

run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting... for xpt_config

2010-01-20 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Hi, This has passed several times on and of the lists. And is hindering me too. I'm trying to revive an old dual optern Tyan Tomcat S2875 board. Even upgraded it to the most recent BIOS. But still no go. Both with 8.0 and 7.2 RELEASE. I've also disabled P1394 and all USB in the BIOS, that did

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-20 Thread Henri Hennebert
On 01/19/2010 17:12, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. What patch does: - It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or later, CAM will automatically

Re: IPSec NAT-T in transport mode

2010-01-20 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:16:02PM +0600, Rabidinov M.A. wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-stable. Hi. > Does FreeBSD 8.0 support IPSec NAT-T in transport mode? > I want to create a L2TP/IPSec server. My VPN clients are NATed. > L2TP server (MPD5.x) makes tunnel, so I need working IPSec NAT-T in transport

Re: IPSec NAT-T in transport mode

2010-01-20 Thread Crest
Rabidinov M.A. schrieb: > Hello, Freebsd-stable. > > Does FreeBSD 8.0 support IPSec NAT-T in transport mode? > I want to create a L2TP/IPSec server. My VPN clients are NATed. > L2TP server (MPD5.x) makes tunnel, so I need working IPSec NAT-T in transport > mode. > Thanks a lot. > Yes the NAT-T

IPSec NAT-T in transport mode

2010-01-20 Thread Rabidinov M.A.
Hello, Freebsd-stable. Does FreeBSD 8.0 support IPSec NAT-T in transport mode? I want to create a L2TP/IPSec server. My VPN clients are NATed. L2TP server (MPD5.x) makes tunnel, so I need working IPSec NAT-T in transport mode. Thanks a lot. -- С уважением, Rabidinov ma

Re: 8.0-RELEASE / gpart / GPT / marking a partition as "active"

2010-01-20 Thread Robert Noland
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 19:11 +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks > using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as > "active". See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin > for a prime example. > > In 8.0-