> Your machine is starving!
How can this be, there is over 500MiB free ram at all times? I'm
running literally no userland apps other than X and xterms when it
reboots.
I think I may be hitting some limit with this 366MiB and reboot bit.
How can I tell what my kernel limits are on this platform?
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:55, grarpamp@ wrote:
Happened again :) So some more notes...
Watched it this time, it jumped from about 29xMiB straight to 366MiB,
then hung and rebooted itself.
The first zpool import after reboot takes about a minute more than
the usual ten seconds to import. And uses
Happened again :) So some more notes...
Watched it this time, it jumped from about 29xMiB straight to 366MiB,
then hung and rebooted itself.
The first zpool import after reboot takes about a minute more than
the usual ten seconds to import. And uses up to maybe 125MiB instead
of maybe 40MiB. Coul
Hi.
I'm running i386 on i386, single P4 cpu, 1GiB RAM.
SiI 3114 -> SATA [single disk] -> GELI [AES-128] -> ZFS [sha256]
Straight RELENG_8 as of cvsup Oct 12 14:49:00 aka 8.0-RC1 plus.
ZFS pool is at v13, ZFS fs is at v3.
Hardware seems stable.
The only modification to config defaults is:
loader.c
Good afternoon,
I am having a few niggly problems setting up a VNC repeater on my
FreeBSD box and I am finding it very hard to find any information
anywhere. I freshly installed FreeBSD on the box today and updated ports
and system. I then make && make build && make install
/usr/ports/net/rep
As a follow-up to my original message, and I thank the couple people that
did respond with suggestions. I seem to have found the issue, which is
apparently cvsup17.FreeBSD.org and some file inconsistency.
I was using cvsup17 as it was a very close site hop/ping wise on my various
servers, in f
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:58:09AM +0200, Thomas Backman wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:35 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> >hi,
> >this issue (not specific to FreeBSD, and not new -- it has been
> >like this forever) is discussed in some detail here
> >
> > http://www.bsdcan.org/2009/schedule/
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
I recall others having various weird problems in 3.5 that went away when
they upgraded to 4.0.
It would be a good idea except that apparently my installation is
unupgradeable because of "unsupported boot disk" (a SCSI RAID volume).
Ivan Voras wrote:
2009/10/13 Larry Rosenman :
note huge packet loss. It looks like it's VM fault or something like it.
It sounds like the VM is failing to execute the guest during certain
types of I/O. A bit of scheduler tracing in the host OS probably wouldn't go
amiss to confirm that the VM
Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:
As for what data is needed, it depends on what you can get - from this
discussion thread it looks like it would be enough to verify that disk
IO doesn't leave VM processes waiting (i.e. that disk IO doesn't
interfere with CPU-bound o
10 matches
Mail list logo
