Quoting Doug Barton :
Oliver Fromme wrote:
There are shell machines with lots of user accounts, none
of which have administrative control of the system.
Sure there are, but they make up only a tiny fraction of the systems
on the network today.
wow
Doug
--
Improve the effective
Doug Barton wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > There are shell machines with lots of user accounts, none
> > of which have administrative control of the system.
>
> Sure there are, but they make up only a tiny fraction of the systems
> on the network today.
Are you sure? The majority of BSD
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Daniel Eischen wrote:
While it's probably a bug that the Samba port compiles --pie, it's also a
bug that our linking bits aren't handling PIE properly either. The goal is
to fix PIE with the non-NULL mapping feature in the immediate future, so
with any luck the abort mess
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 20:31:01 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> > On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 18:44:08 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > on 01/10/2009 17:49 Andre Albsmeier said the following:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > is it cor
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
>> There are shell machines with lots of user accounts, none
>> of which have administrative control of the system.
>
> Sure there are, but they make up only a tiny fraction of the systems
> on the network today.
>
>
share
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> There are shell machines with lots of user accounts, none
> of which have administrative control of the system.
Sure there are, but they make up only a tiny fraction of the systems
on the network today.
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > Daniel Bond wrote:
> > > However, I'm concerned about the suggestion of using an
> > > unprivileged port
> >
> > Please explain your reasoning, and how it's relevant in a world where
> > the vast majority of Internet users have complete administrative
> > control o
Claus Assmann wrote:
> On FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE it seems to be impossible to map the Backspace
> key to '\' and '|'. Here's what I did:
>
> Change /usr/share/syscons/keymaps/us.unix.kbd:
> [...]
The diff looks good and should work fine.
> and run:
> kbdcontrol -k /dev/console -l /usr/share/
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
This was caused by your setting of the following:
security.bsd.map_at_zero=0 You can reset that value to 1 and you should be
alright to operate like normal otherwise you will have to compile samba
over again
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
This was caused by your setting of the following:
security.bsd.map_at_zero=0 You can reset that value to 1 and you should be
alright to operate like normal otherwise you will have to compile samba
over again with the above mentioned configure options.
TB --- 2009-10-08 11:23:56 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2009-10-08 11:23:56 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2009-10-08 11:23:56 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2009-10-08 11:24:17 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2009-10-08 11:24:17 - /usr/b
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 01:29 -0400, barney@ wrote:
I believe you are wrong about prior behavior. sudo is from a port and
is in /usr/local/bin. Any shell is going to expand the list of args
*before* giving control to the executable. So the system will churn
for a while before sudo gets to ask for
12 matches
Mail list logo
