Hi!
> I had the same problem with beta4:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-September/011470.html
>
> and I tried this fix, and it did not solve the problem.
>
> It might be related with the number of slices and partitions one
> is creating ? I'll try this again today.
dd 1m zero on the drive and rerun the 8.0Beta4 DVD. Created two slices S1 and
S2,
and did auto labling (unix partiton) on S1, hit W, the problem persists.
Boot system with freeBSD 6.4, and 6.4 sees two slices (MBR partitions) S1 and
S2,
but no any Unix partition (ad0s1a, ad0s1b etc) on S1.
Boo
Hello,
My server was using FreeBSD-7-Stable and performing
a mail server. Software I used is postfix 2.6.3
and dovecot 1.2.4.
The hardware is IBM blade server HS-21
CPU: dual Intel E5335 @ 2.00GHz
MEM: 3G
HD: onboard LSI RAID controller with 2 73G SAS HD.
(mpt0: )
The system is very stable until l
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:08:53 -0700 (PDT), Jin Guojun
wrote:
> I do not enve know how to make "dangerously dedicated" disk,
> and the 8.0 may do this sliently.
This term refers to a disk where no "DOS primary partition",
i. e. a slice, has been created. Usually, for a disk with
only FreeBSD on it
A lot of these LORs were fixed in cxgb in FreeBSD 8. You can look at
cxgb_main.c in 8 for details. I'll also try and figure out if those
changes are easily MFC'able.
Regards,
Navdeep
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Matthew Fleming
wrote:
> We got a cxgb LOR report of:
>
> 1st 0xff8001e37b
Le Lun 14 sep 09 à 23:08:53 +0200, Jin Guojun
écrivait :
> I do not enve know how to make "dangerously dedicated" disk, and the
> 8.0 may do this sliently.
No, I don't think so! But such a problem may arise if your disk had been
installed as "dangerously dedicated" in a former version. Unfortuna
We got a cxgb LOR report of:
1st 0xff8001e37be0 vlan_global (vlan_global) @
/build/mnt/src/sys/modules/if_vlan/../../net/if_vlan.c:1310
2nd 0xff80010892f0 cxgb port lock (cxgb port lock) @
/build/mnt/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c:1956
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_
I do not enve know how to make "dangerously dedicated" disk, and the 8.0 may do
this sliently.
ad0 had three DOS partitions (slices),
S1 for DOS
S2 for FreeBSD 7.2
S3 for another FreeBSD
When boot to 8.0-Beta{3, 4}, 8.0 sees not partition, which means 8.0 looked at
a wrong location for partitio
Le Lun 14 sep 09 à 18:56:38 +0200, Jin Guojun
écrivait :
> It seems that disklabel is the problem spot.
Hello,
I encountered such a problem too; was your disk ad0 installed as
"dangerously dedicated"?
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
___
freebsd-stable@freeb
It seems that disklabel is the problem spot.
Use 8.0 Partition menu to allocate 2 slices (partitions) 20GB for S1 and rest
for S2,
then install 8.0-Beta4 on S1.
W command in slice (Partition) menu succeed with bootloader manager installing
option (Choose FreeBSD),
but W command in Label menu had
Hi all,
I upgraded a FreeBSD fileserver last week from 7.0-stable to 7.2-stable
and experience some weird problems now with Linux NFS clients.
The Linux Clients mount their home directories via nfs. I usually use
"nolock" on the client side, because file locking was always troublesome
in the past.
On Friday 11 September 2009 12:18:39 pm Alban Hertroys wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just got a kernel panic on a FreeBSD 7.2 STABLE after a print job
> finished on ulpt. The kgdb output (ran in script) is attached. I'll
> keep the vmcore around in case anyone needs more info. Shout if you
> need mo
On Friday 11 September 2009 11:46:13 am Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 September 2009 8:57:32 pm Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have an overclocked i7 920 CPU for which I have enabled Turbo Mode in
> >> the BIOS (21x multiplier). The base cl
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/23 C. C. Tang :
>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
>
> Could that one (on i386) be related?
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>
I have no idea about it but I can tell the diff
2009/7/23 C. C. Tang :
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
Could that one (on i386) be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>>> I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
>>> My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown
George Mamalakis wrote:
Artis, and the rest of the guys, thank you all for your answers.
Ivan, I was thinking of using one of the techniques you mention (create
two volumes, install fbsd on one of them, and use GTP on the second
drive), but I was wondering if there would be any "incompatibilit
16 matches
Mail list logo
