Hi all!
It's one more fix to ntp program set, ntpd man page for freebsd 7-stable.
commit 8d33c5f3a2ab8215f7b8e6efaa44ee1c5f63b4dc
Author: opv
Date: Tue Aug 25 05:19:10 2009 +0200
fix ntpd man
man:
-d Specify debugging mode. This option may occur more than once
Hi all!
It's a small fix to ntpdate man page for freebsd 7-stable.
commit 541cadb46c21521851327e6de51e1ae349b56453
Author: opv
Date: Tue Aug 25 04:43:28 2009 +0200
fix the ntprace man file
in ntptrace man:
--8<--
...
The following options are availa
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Just in case someone reads this and tries 'portupgrade -af', it also
> will re-build all installed ports, whether they need upgrading. This is
> the command to re-build ALL ports when the library versions get bumped
> (as they did recently for 8.0BETA).
>
> To just update t
Lisa Besko wrote:
> We had an issue with the /etc/rc.d/named script this morning where it
> looped/hung in the wait_for_pids subroutine. We run a job to restart
> named which calls the /etc/rc.d/named script with a stop command. For
> some reason named did not stop properly and the process contin
Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> Has named's rc script worked OK before? If not, it might be a config
>> problem like mine. I found that after I added
>> pid-file"/var/run/named/pid";
>> to the options section of my named.conf file, the rc script was able to
>> stop/restart a running named p
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:01:53 -0500
From: Guy Helmer
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Lisa Besko wrote:
We had an issue with the /etc/rc.d/named script this morning where it
looped/hung in the wait_for_pids subroutine. We run a job to restart
named which c
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:01:53 -0500
> From: Guy Helmer
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> Lisa Besko wrote:
> > We had an issue with the /etc/rc.d/named script this morning where it
> > looped/hung in the wait_for_pids subroutine. We run a job to restart
> > named which calls t
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
> From: Doug Barton
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > hail,
> >
> > portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
> > portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it as
Lisa Besko wrote:
We had an issue with the /etc/rc.d/named script this morning where it
looped/hung in the wait_for_pids subroutine. We run a job to restart
named which calls the /etc/rc.d/named script with a stop command. For
some reason named did not stop properly and the process continued
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> hail,
>
> portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
> portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
> this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? delete and go ahead ?
You really want to read the man page thoroughl
The third of the BETA builds for the FreeBSD-8.0 release cycle is now
available. All major work related to new features in 8.0 has been
completed and we are shifting into "bugfix only" mode for the balance of
the release cycle. Debugging features (e.g. WITNESS) are still enabled
but will be remov
We had an issue with the /etc/rc.d/named script this morning where it
looped/hung in the wait_for_pids subroutine. We run a job to restart
named which calls the /etc/rc.d/named script with a stop command. For
some reason named did not stop properly and the process continued to
list PIDs from
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> I took this weekend to install a fresh 8.0-BETA2 on my old Dell
> Lattitude D520, and after the initial install proceeded with a typical
> buildworld run.
> Now with the new kernel (which reports itself as 8.0-BETA3) my CD/DVD
> combo drive
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:03:40PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> hail,
>
> portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
> portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
> this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? delete and go ahead ?
>
>
On Mon, August 24, 2009 12:06, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:03:40PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>> hail,
>>
>> portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire
>> a
>> portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it
>> asks
>> this.
hail,
portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? delete and go ahead ?
thanks,
matheus
ps:unless this is what portmaster's man calls backup packag
16 matches
Mail list logo
