Alexander Motin wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> I can rule out drm0 as the cause, because uhci0 is the only common
>> presence in all occurrences of this problem.
>
> You have other examples? If you mean "irq16: hdac0 uhci+" string, then
> "+" there means "and some other devices", which in thi
Dear colleagues,
is it normal that between reboots NFS exported ZFS file systems change NFS
handles? After server reboot, I have
stale NFS handle
on any request to previously mounted FS. On UFS, mounted NFS file systems
survive server reboots...
Thanks in advance.
--
Sincerely,
D.Marck
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I can rule out drm0 as the cause, because uhci0 is the only common
presence in all occurrences of this problem.
You have other examples? If you mean "irq16: hdac0 uhci+" string, then
"+" there means "and some other devices", which in this case is probably
drm0.
There
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 21:04 -0700, Chris H wrote:
> Greetings,
> A fresh install of 7 followed by a cvsup to 7.2-PRE on the 26th
> results in an inability to build Xorg on the system. A cvsup only
> an hour ago provides no solution.
>
> An attempt at the following:
>
> cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg-mini
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Alexander Motin wrote:
> It means that one of your CPUs spent most of it's time in interrupt
> processing and so far from idle. What does `top -P` shows you? Where
> have you seen t
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
189100 ok
189150 fails
I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
189150 is in the middle of a big string of rela
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>> Alexander Motin wrote:
It means that one of your CPUs spent most of it's time in interrupt
processing and so far from idle. What does `top -P` shows you? Where
have you seen that ~6% CPU load?
>>> That is t
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> It means that one of your CPUs spent most of it's time in interrupt
>>> processing and so far from idle. What does `top -P` shows you? Where
>>> have you seen that ~6% CPU load?
>>
>> That is the load shown by the e17 CPU
Nathanael Jean-Francois wrote:
Hello all,
I've been getting some panics with a 7.1 stable machine from March 14th.
I've not been able to determine the cause nor reproduce them at will.
Here's a backtrace from the latest panic on March 23rd. Let me know if any
more information is needed. Thanks.
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Alexander Motin wrote:
It means that one of your CPUs spent most of it's time in interrupt
processing and so far from idle. What does `top -P` shows you? Where
have you seen that ~6% CPU load?
That is the load shown by the e17 CPU module. It's display has always
been in
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Since I updated to the 7.2 prerelease, powerd is broken.
>>
>>> uname -a
>> FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 7.2-PRERELEASE Fr
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Alexander Motin wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Alexander Motin wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Since I updated to the 7.2 prerelease, powerd is broken.
uname -a
FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #0:
Tue Mar 24 07:57:30 CET 2009
r...@m
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Since I updated to the 7.2 prerelease, powerd is broken.
> uname -a
FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #0:
Tue Mar 24 07:57:30 CET 2009
>>>
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Alexander Motin wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Since I updated to the 7.2 prerelease, powerd is broken.
uname -a
FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #0:
Tue Mar 24 07:57:30 CET 2009
r...@mobilekamikaze.norad:/usr/obj/HP6510b/amd64/usr/
> Danny Braniss danny at cs.huji.ac.il writes:
> > at least for me :-)
> > [and sorry for the cross posting]
> >
> [...]
> >
> > amr0: mem
> > 0xfbef-0xfbef,0xfe58-0xfe5f
> > irq 27 at device 0.0 on pci4
> > amr0: [ITHREAD]
> > amr0: delete logical drives supported by controller
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:08:29 +0100
Marc "UBM" Bocklet wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:39:51 +1100
> Andrew Snow wrote:
>
> >
> > I think that if you use eSATA you probably need dedicated eSATA
> > controller ports. eSATA standard specifies a higher voltage for
> > the longer cable distances.
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Since I updated to the 7.2 prerelease, powerd is broken.
>>
>>> uname -a
>> FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #0:
>> Tue Mar 24 07:57:30 CET 2009
>> r...@mobilekamikaze.norad:/usr/obj/HP6510b/amd64/usr/src/sys/H
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >>> it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
> >>> it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
> >>> 189100 ok
> >>> 189150 fails
> >>> I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> 189150 is in the middle of a big
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Since I updated to the 7.2 prerelease, powerd is broken.
uname -a
FreeBSD mobileKamikaze.norad 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar
24 07:57:30 CET 2009
r...@mobilekamikaze.norad:/usr/obj/HP6510b/amd64/usr/src/sys/HP6510b amd64
It increases the CPU f
19 matches
Mail list logo