drm change breaks old ATI?

2009-03-17 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seems that the new drm schema requires an interrupt to attach. "dmesg" returns: pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: on hostb0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xd100-0xd1f

vmstat memory: avm vs fre

2009-03-17 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I'm getting a really odd condition on one of my servers (and I suspect its happening on one of my other servers as well) ... after a period of time (<3 days), the server hangs solid ... Running vmstat in an xterm, the one thing I'm noticing is that when it hangs, my avm == 12455M and fre ==

Re: rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused

2009-03-17 Thread Peter C. Lai
Yes that is exactly the point. RNDC is supposed to run on 953 and the name service itself is on 53. Think about it, if tcp/53 is used for real DNS (jumbo RR) traffic, how can rndc be listening for commands on the same channel? On 2009-03-17 06:10:44PM -0600, Squirrel wrote: > I realized that defau

Re: rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused

2009-03-17 Thread Squirrel
I realized that default for RNDC was 953, and forced it to 53, but was still getting the same error. As you recommended, I used the '-g' and noticed only unusual thing was: /etc/namedb/named.conf:23: couldn't add command channel 127.0.0.1#53: address in use So I took out the port 53 out of

Re: Radeon r6/7xx support merged to -STABLE

2009-03-17 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:49:12 +0100, Robert Noland wrote: I went ahead and merged the Radeon R6/7xx code to -STABLE a while ago. The current xorg drivers will not enable it by default on R600+ chips. You will need to be using xf86-video-ati-6.12.0, xf86-video-radeonhd-devel or possibly even b

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-03-17 Thread Greg Rivers
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Robert Noland wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:20 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Robert Noland wrote: I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. - Support for latest Intel chips - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below

Re: rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused

2009-03-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Squirrel writes: > My BIND9.6.0 on FreeBSD 6.2 works fine when I manually start with: > >r...@ns2# named -4 -S 1024 -c /etc/namedb/named.conf > > But it won't start on boot and no error messages or log. And it won't start > using rndc, it cause error message. Why does the err

Re: rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused

2009-03-17 Thread Squirrel
Will, just for heck of it, I've changed the default ports to 953 on both named.conf and rndc.conf, but still same error. -Original message- From: Squirrel squir...@mail.isot.com Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:41:26 -0600 To: freebsd-stable freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: rndc: connect fai

rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused

2009-03-17 Thread Squirrel
My BIND9.6.0 on FreeBSD 6.2 works fine when I manually start with: r...@ns2# named -4 -S 1024 -c /etc/namedb/named.conf But it won't start on boot and no error messages or log. And it won't start using rndc, it cause error message. Why does the error shows port 953 when I specified for por

KLD cbb.ko: depends on exca - not available

2009-03-17 Thread pluknet
Hi. FreeBSD 7-STABLE. Subj message appears when I try to kldload cbb.ko and kernel cannot find exca due to its non-existence. The pccbb(4) manpage doesn't mention exca. make install exca helps with kldload, now: cbb0: at device 1.0 on pci1 cbb0: [ITHREAD] Would it be correct to add a new entry

Re: general: warning: max open files (3636) is smaller than maxsockets (4096)

2009-03-17 Thread Squirrel
Nice!!! Thank you. --- PCShare.Com -Original message- From: David Kelly dke...@hiwaay.net Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:32:10 -0600 To: Squirrel squir...@mail.isot.com Subject: Re: general: warning: max open files (3636) is smaller than maxsockets (4096) > On Tue, Mar 1

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-03-17 Thread Robert Noland
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:20 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Robert Noland wrote: > > > I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. > > > >- Support for latest Intel chips > >- Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below > >- Support AMD/ATI

Re: FreeBSD 7.2 Release process starting...

2009-03-17 Thread Holger Kipp
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:19:11AM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > We're starting the release process for FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE. The major > highlights of the schedule are: Is there a chance the latest ZFS bugfixes from CURRENT will make it into 7.2-RELEASE? Regards, Holger

Re: general: warning: max open files (3636) is smaller than max sockets (4096)

2009-03-17 Thread David Kelly
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:31:43PM -0600, Squirrel wrote: > This happend since I've upgraded bind 9.21 to 9.6.0. I've increased > the max open files to 4096: > >sysctl -w kern.maxfiles=4096 > > which shows it resized from 4040->4096 > > But I guess it's different for bind? I've googled and

general: warning: max open files (3636) is smaller than max sockets (4096)

2009-03-17 Thread Squirrel
This happend since I've upgraded bind 9.21 to 9.6.0. I've increased the max open files to 4096: sysctl -w kern.maxfiles=4096 which shows it resized from 4040->4096 But I guess it's different for bind? I've googled and found several references to this warning message, but everyone states i

Re: GCC build causes panic: page already inserted

2009-03-17 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:23:09 -0600 Dan Allen wrote: > It turns out that one must have a debug kernel around. I use STABLE > as a production system. There is no "kernel.debug" on my system. I > guess I therefore cannot provide a stack trace. Have you disbled building of the kernel.debug th

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-03-17 Thread Greg Rivers
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Robert Noland wrote: I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. - Support for latest Intel chips - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below - Support AMD/ATI IGP based chips (rs690/rs485) - Lots of code cleanups - Lots

Re: Crazy "interrupt storm detected" on atapci0

2009-03-17 Thread Marat N.Afanasyev
Nicolais wrote: Also - this was extracted from kenv: smbios.system.maker="MICRO-STAR INTERANTIONAL CO.,LTD" smbios.system.product="MS-7368" as I supposed in previous message your MB is MicroStar product. So I insist that you read thread [1] in freebsd-stable named 'Interrupt storm' started b

Re: Crazy "interrupt storm detected" on atapic0

2009-03-17 Thread Marat N.Afanasyev
Nicolai wrote: Hi all, I have had this problem since day 1 on my new server. It has run since November 15th 2008, and serve approx. 10 GB worth of web traffic per month for the main site and then some 40 domains with mail and small web pages. (hence - it's NOT that busy yet) I started wi

Re: Crazy "interrupt storm detected" on atapci0

2009-03-17 Thread Nicolais
Also - this was extracted from kenv: LINES="24" acpi_load="YES" bootfile="kernel" comconsole_speed="9600" console="vidconsole" currdev="disk0s1a:" hint.acpi.0.oem="ACPIAM" hint.acpi.0.revision="1" hint.acpi.0.rsdp="0xf98a0" hint.acpi.0.rsdt="0x7dfd" hint.atkbd.0.at="atkbdc" hint.atkbd.0.irq="

FreeBSD 7.2 Release process starting...

2009-03-17 Thread Ken Smith
We're starting the release process for FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE. The major highlights of the schedule are: Code Freeze:March 23rd BETA1 March 30th Branch April 10th RC1 April 13th RC2

Crazy "interrupt storm detected" on atapic0

2009-03-17 Thread Nicolai
Hi all, I have had this problem since day 1 on my new server. It has run since November 15th 2008, and serve approx. 10 GB worth of web traffic per month for the main site and then some 40 domains with mail and small web pages. (hence - it's NOT that busy yet) I started with 7.1-RELEASE-pX

Re: GCC build causes panic: page already inserted

2009-03-17 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Dan Allen wrote: > > On 16 Mar 2009, at 1:01 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > >> For now, can you just provide the stack trace? > > As I mentioned, I am unable to do so - I have no kernel.debug. > > However, I am trying to reproduce the bug again.  (It takes a while.) >  Alth

RELENG_7/i386: ZFS panic on reboot

2009-03-17 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
while rebooting: (kgdb) bt #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 #1 0x80514298 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418 #2 0x80514575 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 #3 0x806a74d4 in trap_fatal (frame=0xbf5b9a24, eva=12) at

Appeal for active bug reports relating to TCP, UDP, routing locking in 7-STABLE

2009-03-17 Thread Robert Watson
Dear all: With 7.2 approaching, I wanted to review the set of known network bug reports (especially panics, hangs, lock order reversals) relating to TCP, UDP, sockets, and routing in 7-STABLE. If you are aware of problems along these that you can confirm definitely occur with 7-STABLE check

Re: Page fault panic in scioctl and console-kit-daemon

2009-03-17 Thread spara
I switched to xfce myself and did not reinstall consolekit… don't know how armfull it could be though… Le 17 mars 09 à 10:31, Arrigo Marchiori a écrit : Hello, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:24:57PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:15:15PM +0100, spara wrote: [...] A

Re: Page fault panic in scioctl and console-kit-daemon

2009-03-17 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:24:57PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:15:15PM +0100, spara wrote: [...] > > Any other fix ? > > It seems to me that no package has been depending on consolekit, since > a couple of days. At least, portupgrade is not showing any more