Hi,
I've made a mistake in the subject line. Sorry.
--
Martin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I don't know whether or not this has been fixed, but I found that I had to
recompile tcpslice and/or tcpdump to deal with files larger than 4 gig (or
maybe 2 gig). I suppose it's a better situation than wireshark. After a
few million packets, it falls over because it makes the widgets in the
scro
Hi,
Few hours ago I have updated my machine to latest RELENG_7.
daemon% uname -an
FreeBSD daemon.micom.mng.net 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #6:
Tue Nov 18 02:05:57 ULAT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GDAEMON i386
daemon%
When I try to issue command shutdown -p now, syst
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Ramesh Ayyagari
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have my client system running FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p1 with 4 GB of RAM. This
> morning i have the following errors popping up on the console log -
>
> postfix/qmgr[94057]: fatal: socket: Too many open fil
Hello All,
I have my client system running FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p1 with 4 GB of RAM. This
morning i have the following errors popping up on the console log -
postfix/qmgr[94057]: fatal: socket: Too many open files
Googling for this error, I found this is someway related to the kernel
parameter
Hi,
I have a weird situation here on 7-PRERELEASE since a longer time. When
I enable IPv6, syslogd tries to start before the network is being
initialised and I get the following output:
Mounting local file systems:.
hw.snd.default_unit: 0 -> 1
Setting hostname: zelda.local.
Creating and/or trim
Is there anything NFS related to the box? If yes, then it could be
because of some hung mounts.
Thanks
Subhro
On 11/19/08, Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anyone see the 'df' command just hang after an upgrade?
> From another terminal, I saw df in the 'D' state when running ps.
>
> I tri
Jille Timmermans wrote:
Are there 'broken' (lost connection without being umounted) NFS mounts
by any chance ?
That would cause df to wait for eternity (or till the host comes back up).
Doh! I have the FreeBSD source on one server and mount over NFS for
builds. I thought I'd already rebo
Are there 'broken' (lost connection without being umounted) NFS mounts
by any chance ?
That would cause df to wait for eternity (or till the host comes back up).
-- Jille
Rudy schreef:
>
> Has anyone see the 'df' command just hang after an upgrade?
> From another terminal, I saw df in the 'D' st
Has anyone see the 'df' command just hang after an upgrade?
From another terminal, I saw df in the 'D' state when running ps.
I tried 'df &' in my new terminal, and that too just hung out in the
background.
typing 'reboot' fixed the problem. =)
This box had been up for a while, no problems.
[Cross-post to -questions elided, since I saw the message on -stable,
and I'd like to discourage gratuitous cross-posting. dhw]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:30:39PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a kind big tcpdump file, which has data from the last week. I
> want to dump informat
Hello,
I have a kind big tcpdump file, which has data from the last week. I
want to dump information based on date. Can I do it without generating
a full output and later parse the headers?
Say, I want to filter by date in the filter and not with
tcpdump -r dumpfile | awk '{ number of packets s
# apachectl -V
Server version: Apache/2.2.9 (FreeBSD)
Server built: Oct 17 2008 13:31:54
Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:15
Server loaded: APR 1.3.0, APR-Util 1.3.0
Compiled using: APR 1.3.0, APR-Util 1.3.0
Architecture: 64-bit
Server MPM: Prefork
threaded: no
forked:
For what's worth it, I have similar problems on a comparable system
(amd64/8GB,
7.1-PRERELEASE #3: Sun Nov 16 13:39:43), which I wouldn't call
heavilly threaded yet (as there is only one mysql51 running,
and courier-mta/imap, max 15 users now).
Perhaps worth a note: Bjoern's multi-IP jail patc
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 08:04:41PM +0300, Igor Lyapin wrote:
> I already sent # top head in my first mail
> that's all non idle top process
>
> last pid: 56920; load averages: 2.90, 2.25, 1.72 up
> 0+22:10:12 20:04:05
> 210 processes: 2 running, 207 sleeping, 1 zombie
> CPU st
I already sent # top head in my first mail
that's all non idle top process
last pid: 56920; load averages: 2.90, 2.25, 1.72 up
0+22:10:12 20:04:05
210 processes: 2 running, 207 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU states: 8.3% user, 0.0% nice, 32.5% system, 0.3% interrupt, 58.9%
idle
Mem
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:58:09PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >> Some network management apps could also decide to use the description
> >> field as a repository for more dynamic data; data that could be queried
> >> by applications running on the hosts. Here too, would'nt it be more
> >> effic
Igor Lyapin wrote:
> Hello
> Got strange problem with high system "%system load" and very slow user level
> programs (apache+php+mysql) behavior
> gstat shows 1.5-4% hard disk busy load but system shows about 20-30% load
> while user load is max 5%.
> vmstat shows from 2 to 35 process in "b" state
Hello
Got strange problem with high system "%system load" and very slow user level
programs (apache+php+mysql) behavior
gstat shows 1.5-4% hard disk busy load but system shows about 20-30% load
while user load is max 5%.
vmstat shows from 2 to 35 process in "b" state.
Now use 7.0-RELEASE-p5 , but
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, cpghost wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:23:05PM +0100, cpghost wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:07:32PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, cpghost wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yeah, since we're in wi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:23:05PM +0100, cpghost wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:07:32PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, cpghost wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:07:32PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, cpghost wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I want interface
> descriptions too...
> >>>
> >>> Have you look
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:48:06PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 12:38 +0100, cpghost wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > >Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I want interface
> > > > >descriptions too...
> > > >
>
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 12:38 +0100, cpghost wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I want interface
> > > >descriptions too...
> > >
> > > Have you looked at the 'name' and 'group' keywords in ifconfig(8)?
>
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, cpghost wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I want interface
descriptions too...
Have you looked at the 'name' and 'group' keywords in ifconfig(8)?
If this isn't what you want, please exp
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I want interface
> > >descriptions too...
> >
> > Have you looked at the 'name' and 'group' keywords in ifconfig(8)?
> > If this isn't what you want, please expand on your wish.
>
This has now been raised as PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128954
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Chadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:45:43PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Jeremy Chadwick
> >Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I want interface
> >descriptions too...
>
> Have you looked at the 'name' and 'group' keywords in ifconfig(8)?
> If this isn't what you want, please expand on your wish.
It is not what I want.
On routers, switches and lots of other boxes from mos
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:58:35 +0800，Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 06:53:41PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Xin LI wrote:
> Hi, Pawel,
>
> We can still reproduce the ZFS crash (threading+heavy I/O load) on a
> fresh
On 2008-Nov-17 23:36:19 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Oh yeah, since we're in wishful thinking mode, I want interface
>descriptions too...
Have you looked at the 'name' and 'group' keywords in ifconfig(8)?
If this isn't what you want, please expand on your wish.
--
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse
30 matches
Mail list logo
