Dear All:
My apologies for sending this message to the wrong mailing list.
I am indeed on the freebsd-stable list, as I use this OS,
but the message was mistakenly sent to this forum.
Sorry for disturbing your work.
Let me take this opportunity to thank the developers for such a superb
operating
I'm really not into that anti-human movement and I think it's a pity
that poor mouse has to suffer. I suggest you take three Valiums instead
and call me in the morning...
Davide Marini wrote:
Dear All:
Has anybody tried the anti-MDR1 from Millipore, by any chance?
I am looking for a rel
Dear All:
Has anybody tried the anti-MDR1 from Millipore, by any chance?
http://www.millipore.com/catalogue/item/mab4161#
I am looking for a reliable mouse anti-human antibody, targeting
the extracellular epitope of P-glycoprotein.
Any suggestion is extremely appreciated!
Thank you in advance.
lhmwzy wrote:
Yes,this is a way.
I would do as you said if I need to do so.
2008/10/1 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 02:29:12PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
That's it.
Since we don't have the skill,what we can do is wait.
Waiting is such a bad thing...
If this fu
2008/9/28 Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have made an update for the top(1) utility in the FreeBSD base
> system to get it from the 3.5b12 version to the 3.8b1 version.
>
> I have tried them on the amd64 architecture on FreeBSD -current and
> FreeBSD 7.0 and on the i386 architecture on Fr
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Gary Palmer wrote:
Periodically logging "ps -auxw" output to a file would be useful, as
ideally you'd gradually see the list get longer and longer over time;
it's possible you have many zombie processes as a result of a parent
which is not reaping its
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 02:29:12PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
>> That's it.
>> Since we don't have the skill,what we can do is wait.
>>
>> Waiting is such a bad thing...
>
> If this functionality is really something you wan
On Sep 25, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I'm not clear on how this helps. We don't know if there will be a
need to produce a 6.5 release, so there's no way to judge whether 6.4
should be designated "final" or not. The only logical answer is to do
so, which leaves a substantial chance
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 05:34:04 pm Fernan Aguero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a server (Dell PowerEdge SC1435, ServerWorks HT1000) on which
> I'd like to try installing FreeBSD. I've already failed to make 7.0
> work on this box and was wondering if you have information about the
> behavior of th
> At 05:34 PM 9/30/2008, Fernan Aguero wrote:
>
>> I've been following the "HT1000 chipset errata saga" thread, and the
>> commits by sos@ to CVS (around Jan 2008), but have not seen other more
>> recent posts about this issue ... is it because it's already fixed and
>> working fine for everyone?
At 12:40 PM 10/1/2008, Fernan Aguero wrote:
Thanks for the tip.
Unfortunately, the PowerEdge SC1435 BIOS does not allow much
options here ... I can set the embedded SATA to 'ATA mode'
(corruption hell, tested with 7.1 BETA) or just turn it
'OFF' in which case the FreeBSD installer sees no disk
p
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Gary Palmer wrote:
Periodically logging "ps -auxw" output to a file would be useful, as
ideally you'd gradually see the list get longer and longer over time; it's
possible you have many zombie processes as a result of a parent which is
not reaping its children (calling wait
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:50:46AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The
> > problem manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 09:54:01PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:35:06AM +0200, V??clav Haisman wrote:
> > > to reproduce it (if possible). Thanks for your help!
> > Is this 7.0+ only? I run 6.3 and I see the following when I start it:
> >
> > last pid: -1077944144; l
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 06:53:09AM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Because it is a Server Board it offers a lot of managing features and
> > other nice things like serial console at bootup and system monitoring
> > features... but all unsupported withn FreeBSDs software
Hi,
today I'd a crash again - I was not able to get a crash dump (thought a
"panic" at the end of the kdb would do it but didn't - should have called
dumpon before ;)) - so here now the information I was able to retrieve:
Ok, what I've got so far is wrinting stuff out to the console when the
syst
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 03:46:20PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> I have made an update for the top(1) utility in the FreeBSD base
> system to get it from the 3.5b12 version to the 3.8b1 version.
>
> I have tried them on the amd64 architecture on FreeBSD -current and
> FreeBSD 7.0 and on the i386
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> P.S. -- You're the 2nd person I've encountered in under a week who's
> using 440BX/GX-based hardware in present day. I would not be
> surprised if the board is simply going bad/failing due to age. :-)
I still have quite a few of these in active use. They are good
workhor
On 1 okt 2008, at 12:12, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:42:32AM +0200, Ben Stuyts wrote:
I had to disable mmap access in dovecot, or it would coredump
periodically. (mmap_disable = yes in dovecot.conf) I found that to
be a
problem only on ZFS. I don't know if that's been f
> Thanks, but after reading the thread is there a single place in the kernel
> that reports the how many fds are currently in use? Does the "no more fds"
> message get logged in /var/log/messages or only in the kernel log buffer,
> since I haven't seen that message in the messages file, and since w
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:30:26AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak.
The problem manifests itself after one o
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:30:26AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
>>> Hello List,
>>>
>>> I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak.
>>> The problem manifests itself after one of our re
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The
problem manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up
around 100 days.
The symptom is that it appears no ne
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The
> problem manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up
> around 100 days.
> The symptom is that it appears no new processes can
Hello List,
I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The problem
manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up around 100 days.
The symptom is that it appears no new processes can be spawned. If I try to
ssh to the unit, I can see the 3-way tcp handshak
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 20:32, Roland Smith wrote:
> My GELI encrypted home partition works fine on amd64 7.1-PRERELEASE
> (updated september 25th). I've been tracking stable since 7.0-RELEASE
> without problems.
>
> My custom kernel includes GEOM_ELI, GEOM_LABEL, GEOM_MIRROR and
> GEOM_PART_G
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 10:42:32AM +0200, Ben Stuyts wrote:
> I had to disable mmap access in dovecot, or it would coredump
> periodically. (mmap_disable = yes in dovecot.conf) I found that to be a
> problem only on ZFS. I don't know if that's been fixed yet. Apart from
> that it works great.
On 2008-09-28 14:24:09 (+0200), Nikola Lečić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:46:20 +1000 Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please report any issues with it (compile time, run time) and a way to
> > reproduce it (if possible). Thanks for your help!
>
> last pid: 707
On 30 sep 2008, at 12:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:08:48PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
- email (imap)
I've had good experience with dovecot; I tend to stay away from Cyrus
products (disgusting code with a history of security issues), and
Courier (no interest).
I had
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, George Mamalakis wrote:
It works like a charm! Thank you very much for your time and help,
No problem -- I've gone ahead and committed that change to stable/6.
If you're able to test 6.4RC1 when it comes out to confirm that the
fix works there as
Yes,this is a way.
I would do as you said if I need to do so.
2008/10/1 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 02:29:12PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
>> That's it.
>> Since we don't have the skill,what we can do is wait.
>>
>> Waiting is such a bad thing...
>
> If this functio
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 02:29:12PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
> That's it.
> Since we don't have the skill,what we can do is wait.
>
> Waiting is such a bad thing...
If this functionality is really something you want/need, you should
consider finding a kernel programmer who would be willing to port
32 matches
Mail list logo
