How much faster is a make -j32 than a make -j1?
-Kip
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64
>> port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v.
>
> OpenBSD/sparc64 runs Ultr
> I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64
> port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v.
OpenBSD/sparc64 runs UltraSPARC-T1 and UltraSPARC-T2 systems... and the
com port works too. ;)
In addition to UltraSPARC III, III+, IIIi, IV and Fuji
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:45:08AM +0200, Svein Skogen wrote:
> In 25 words or less, what are the major changes in 7.0->7.1 and 6.3->6.4
> for us end users?
In more words, but pretty interesting:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/6-STABLE/relnotes-i386.html
http://people.freebsd.org/~bma
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Sevan / Venture37
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64
>> port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v.
>
> OpenBSD/sparc64 supports the sun4v architecture & has done for
> I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64
> port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v.
OpenBSD/sparc64 supports the sun4v architecture & has done for a while.
_
Win New Yo
Hi Peter,
There really isn't any magic to bringing up a port. You compile it,
install it, and then run it until it breaks. Once it breaks you spend
a lot of time instrumenting the code to track down what went wrong.
Then, depending on the amount of technical insight you have in to the
issue, you g
On 2008-Aug-23 22:40:55 -0500, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My understanding is the the port is in a pre-alpha state due to unfinished
>work in the kernel, so expecting there to be any userbase is premature.
Except that the wiki gives a far more optimistic picture.
>All of our 'new' a
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> Is there a summary of the open issues somewhere? There are no sun4v
>> PRs open. http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/sun4v effectively hasn't
>> been touched since November 2006 and suggests that the
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 06:52:07PM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> There is a better interpretation, which is that the only critical issue
> is lack of real users for this port, not lack of serial port support :).
My understanding is the the port is in a pre-alpha state due to unfinished
work in th
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Is there a summary of the open issues somewhere? There are no sun4v
PRs open. http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/sun4v effectively hasn't
been touched since November 2006 and suggests that the only critical
issue is lack of serial port support.
There is a better interpretatio
Ken Smith wrote:
> We're about to start the release cycle for FreeBSD-7.1 and FreeBSD-6.4.
> The proposed schedule for the "major events" of the cycle is:
>
> Freeze August 29
> BETASeptember 1
> Branch September 6
> 6.4-RC1 Septembe
On Thursday 14 August 2008 02:46:37 am Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:55:30 -0700 Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about Re: Regression 7.0R -> 7-stable?:
>
> XL> Could you please try disabling ACPI and boot? Additionally a 'boot -
> XL> v' may reveal some useful information as well
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:39:44 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:39:44 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:39:44 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:40:05 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:40:05 - /
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:37:05 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:37:05 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:37:05 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:37:29 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:37:29 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:29:47 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:29:47 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:29:47 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:30:13 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:30:13 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:21:47 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:21:47 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:21:47 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:22:16 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-08-23 09:22:16 - /usr/
16 matches
Mail list logo
