On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 22:27 -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > I think clearing environment using:
> >
> > environ[0] = NULL;
> >
> > has been kind of a semi-standard for a while now. At least Dovecot and
> > Postfix clears their environment this way. But
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I think clearing environment using:
environ[0] = NULL;
has been kind of a semi-standard for a while now. At least Dovecot and
Postfix clears their environment this way. But this no longer works in
FreeBSD 7.0 (putenv(), environ[0]=NULL, putenv() -> ever
On Jun 9, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Joe Kelsey wrote:
Jo Rhett has clearly stated (in offline reply) that they do not
participate in the -BETA and-RC cycles leading up to -RELEASE, so
they therefore do not have any issues with -RELEASE and EoL to raise.
Actually, they still have the same complaints to
Jona Joachim wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jona Joachim wrote:
Hi!
pkg_delete core dumps on me when it tries to remove linux-tiff.
I can reproduce this reliably.
FWIW you can find the core dump here:
http://www.hcl-club.lu/~jaj/stuff/pkg_delete.core
You
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Jona Joachim wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > pkg_delete core dumps on me when it tries to remove linux-tiff.
> > I can reproduce this reliably.
>
> > FWIW you can find the core dump here:
> > http://www.hcl-club.lu/~jaj/stuff/pkg_delete.core
Jo Rhett has clearly stated (in offline reply) that they do not
participate in the -BETA and-RC cycles leading up to -RELEASE, so they
therefore do not have any issues with -RELEASE and EoL to raise.
Actually, they still have the same complaints to raise about EoL, but
since they refuse to par
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> Like I said, you have to define what you mean by "stable" and
>> "unstable" before the discussion can continue.
>>
>> "stable" can mean many things to many people. You talk abou
Hello everybody,
SHORT SUMMARY:
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wip-status
Subscribe today!! Tell all your friends, co-workers and everybody you
know who's interested in FreeBSD. Post this on your blog! ;)
LONG VERSION:
if you've been around lately you might already know ab
I think clearing environment using:
environ[0] = NULL;
has been kind of a semi-standard for a while now. At least Dovecot and
Postfix clears their environment this way. But this no longer works in
FreeBSD 7.0 (putenv(), environ[0]=NULL, putenv() -> everything is
visible again). Was this change in
Is there any way to prevent the BOOTP client from injecting a default
route? When I originally set things up our DHCP server would not send
a default route because there was no gateway, local only. If you
leave out the default route, the server will try proxy-arp when ends
up putting a de
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone verify that some number of bugs related to either a) gmirror, b)
> bge and/or c)twe were fixed after the release of 6.3? That is as far as I
> can tell the reason that Jo objets to EoL of 6.2, the fact that 6.3 i
>>> Skip Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/06/08 1:39 PM >>>
Gavin Spomer wrote:
> I successfully did my first FreeBSD upgrade yesterday after looking at the
> manual, and cross referencing with Googling and getting help from our network
> engineer here at CWU. Before the upgrade, running df showed:
>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 22:30:35 -0700
> From: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:13:43PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:48:12 -0700
> > > From: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun
Quoting Andy Kosela, who wrote on Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:41:24PM +0200 ..
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Russell Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The FreeBSD support for multipath/SAN is fairly poor. It's fiddly
> > to get to work and boot times are a little variable (into the
> > mi
--On Friday, June 06, 2008 19:36:46 +0200 "Arno J. Klaassen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can easily produce a similar panic on a dual Opteron 185 with
3G of RAM and running 7-stable-amd64 on a (cheap) nvidia-based MB.
It runs gmirror on atapci1 and I attach a geli-encrypted
disk via usb. Both
man gmultipath is your friend ;)
MULTIPATH ARCHITECTURE
This is an active/passive multiple path architecture with no device
knowledge or presumptions other than size matching built in. Therefore
the user must exercise some care in selecting providers that do indeed
represent mult
TB --- 2008-06-09 12:25:44 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-06-09 12:25:44 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-06-09 12:25:44 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 12:26:02 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 12:26:02 - /
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:22:52 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:22:52 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:22:52 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:23:29 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:23:30 - /usr/
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:40:12 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:40:12 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:40:12 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:40:43 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:40:43 - /usr/bi
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Russell Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The FreeBSD support for multipath/SAN is fairly poor. It's fiddly
> to get to work and boot times are a little variable (into the
> minutes) as it tries to discover the devices. Once it is configured
> and booted, it j
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:19:40 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:19:40 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:19:40 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:19:56 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-06-09 11:19:56 - /
Daniel Ponticello wrote:
On FreeBSD7, i'm succesfully using Qlogic 4gb fibre channel HBAs (ISP
driver)
attached to Fibre Brocade Switch and IBM DS4700 (14 disks array) using
4 way multipath
with gmultipath.
So far the support in gmultipath is active/passive only? I think in RH5
you can have
On 7 Jun 2008, at 22:54, Max Laier wrote:
Here is a cluebat for you:
Here is another one:
Currently 176 messages, posted by 51 unique participants (25 % by Jo
himself)
Given the fact that at least these 51 persons are actually reading all
the mails, and taking some 5 minutes for it you
Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
> I think there should be a "lower bound" size limit. Does TMPFS use
> kernel-space memory?
Yes, tmpfs does use kmem and competes with ZFS.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Picking one of the many posts from the OP in this thread...
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008, 22:33 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I am suggesting that given that the current bug list for 6.3-RELEASE
> is both (a) too large and (b) breaks things that work fine in 6.2 ...
> that I think pushing 6.2 (the real stab
Joe Kelsey wrote:
The entire problem comes down to the definition of -RELEASE. Jo
apparantly feels that they can ONLY run -RELEASE branded code at their
workplace. That means that they cannot run any form of -STABLE.
Interesting, and unfortunate. Empirically, I always felt that the
-STAB
I think I have finally decoded Jo Rhett's issue. It is very hard to
decipher because the poster refuses to exactly identify their problem.
The entire problem comes down to the definition of -RELEASE. Jo
apparantly feels that they can ONLY run -RELEASE branded code at their
workplace. That m
27 matches
Mail list logo
