On 23/04/2008, at 3:34 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
The
real problem at the bottom of the screen though is a real issue.
It's a LOR
of two different sleepqueue chain locks. The problem is that when
setrunnable() encounters a swapped out thread it tries to wakeup
proc0, but
if proc0 is asleep (whic
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Xin LI spaketh thusly:
-}Could you please show your 'pciconf -lv | grep -A3 ata' output?
-}
-}My 1435 says:
-}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:1: class=0x01018a card=0x01eb1028 chip=0x02141166
-}rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
-}~vendor = 'ServerWorks (Was: Reliance Computer Corp)'
-}~class
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 20:07 -0700, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> What are the hoped for release dates for 7.1? (plus or minus a month)
> I'm debating on running 7.0 vs 7.1 and timing is a consideration.
>
> Regards,
> Jason
Scheduled releases are listed on the release engineering page.
http://www.fr
On 9 May 2008, at 07:07, Paul Koch wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008 06:37:00 pm Doug Rabson wrote:
Could you possibly try this patch and tell me if it helps:
...
Manually applied the patch to stable kern_lockf.c 1.57.2.1. Ran the
flock_test program on many of our architectures and it works fine
