Re: Crash with recent kernel on wireless

2008-04-26 Thread Da Rock
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:07 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > Da Rock wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 11:11 +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:00 +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:25:14PM +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > >

Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2008-04-26 Thread Oleg Bulyzhin
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:50:00PM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:03 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca > TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:03 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 > TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:03 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2008-04-2

Visit Veracity at INTEROP 2008 in Booth #2401

2008-04-26 Thread Veracity USA, Inc.
This email is being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use this link to be deleted or to update your email address http://go.reachmail.net/r.asp?l=64772&ee=7927!stab&s=237056,237056 _ You can choose to not receive further mailings by cl

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2008-04-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-04-26 15:58:55 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-04-26 15:58:55 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-04-26 15:58:55 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-04-26 15:59:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-04-26 15:59:19 - /

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2008-04-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:03 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:03 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:03 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:27 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-04-26 15:48:27 - /usr/bi

Re: Crash with recent kernel on wireless

2008-04-26 Thread Sam Leffler
Da Rock wrote: On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 11:11 +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:00 +0200, Roland Smith wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:25:14PM +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: Hi Recently I've upgraded 7-STABLE: Mar 11 -> Apr 24 Everything was fi

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2008-04-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-04-26 14:32:00 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-04-26 14:32:00 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2008-04-26 14:32:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-04-26 14:32:40 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-04-26 14:32:40 - /usr/

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2008-04-26 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-04-26 14:45:08 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-04-26 14:45:08 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2008-04-26 14:45:08 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-04-26 14:45:35 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-04-26 14:45:35 - /usr/bi

Re: nfs-server silent data corruption

2008-04-26 Thread Arno J. Klaassen
Hello, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 02:35 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > > > > Also, you are using ULE or the 4BSD scheduler ? I > > > still have 4BSD on the box I am testing on. > > > >Interesting, this is with ULE. I didn't really test 4BSD on this > >box (I believ

Re: 7.0 panic in geom / ufs

2008-04-26 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > We have had the following panic now twice on one of our hosting > boxes running 7.0-RELEASE (amd64) > > >From a basic look around it seems that when running the following > that provider (pp) is invalid. > 364 g_trace(G

7.0 panic in geom / ufs

2008-04-26 Thread Steven Hartland
We have had the following panic now twice on one of our hosting boxes running 7.0-RELEASE (amd64) From a basic look around it seems that when running the following that provider (pp) is invalid. 364 g_trace(G_T_BIO, "bio_request(%p) from %p(%s) to %p(%s) cmd %d", 365

Re: MFC Candidate: convert ffs_softdep.c over to callout(9)

2008-04-26 Thread Ilya Bakulin
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:19:01 -0400 Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have an ability to test this patch on RELENG_7 system (there is no mission-critical data stored on HDD :-) ) What sould I do? Just apply patch, recompile kernel and produce some disk load on that system? > Hi stable

garbage in acd0 name

2008-04-26 Thread Alexander Logvinov
Hello. # uname -r 7.0-RELEASE-p1 # dmesg | grep acd acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 acd1: CDRW at ata1-slave UDMA33 # sudo atacontrol info ata1 Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 0 Slave: acd1 ATA/ATAPI revision 5 But cd0 shows the right information: # dmesg | grep cd | grep -v acd cd0 at a

Re: Crash with recent kernel on wireless

2008-04-26 Thread Da Rock
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 11:11 +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:00 +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:25:14PM +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Recently I've upgraded 7-STABLE: Mar 11 -> Apr 24 > > > > > > Everything was

Re: Crash with recent kernel on wireless

2008-04-26 Thread Vladimir Grebenschikov
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:00 +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:25:14PM +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > Hi > > > > Recently I've upgraded 7-STABLE: Mar 11 -> Apr 24 > > > > Everything was fine until I've tried to configure wireless (ath driver, > > WPA) > > It crashes