Re: The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating System

2008-03-23 Thread Wes Peters
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 07:41:30AM -0700, Unga wrote: > > Is the following book still relevant to FreeBSD 7.X > > and upcoming FreeBSD 8.X? Is there a 2nd edition > > coming soon? > > > > The Design and I

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Michael Gratton
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 10:06 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Michael Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, it makes two things really easy: > > > > 1. Automated installation of configuration required by other packages, > > without them all munging and po

Re: gcc -O2 error

2008-03-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:27:45PM +0200, Mikael Ikivesi wrote: > On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:58:01 -0700 > Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There's an off-by-one error in your code, which is very likely > > tickling a bug in gcc. > > Thanks.. > I know...took me a while to find it. >

Re: gcc -O2 error

2008-03-23 Thread Mikael Ikivesi
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:58:01 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's an off-by-one error in your code, which is very likely > tickling a bug in gcc. Thanks.. I know...took me a while to find it. And as code still seemed to work when built without -O2 it was hard to spot. I se

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Michael Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 20:59 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Anders Nordby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > conf.d (custom configuration) > > > sites-available (virtualhost configurat

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Freddie Cash writes: > >Oh, gods, please, no! That is one of the things I absolutely hate > >about Debian (and its derivatives). There are some packages on Debian > >where they use

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Garrett Wollman wrote: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Freddie Cash writes: Oh, gods, please, no! That is one of the things I absolutely hate about Debian (and its derivatives). There are some packages on Debian where they use separate text files for each configuration option (ProFTPd, for

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Greetings, Eirik Øverby wrote: On Mar 23, 2008, at 08:28, Matthew Seaman wrote: Freddie Cash wrote: All that's really needed is a more formalised process for handling upgrading config files, with as much as possible managed via the ports framework itself. Something that dictates the name of

Re: gcc -O2 error

2008-03-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 07:24:33PM +0200, Mikael Ikivesi wrote: > #include > #include > > #define max_word_len64 > > wchar_t *wrong(wchar_t *wordlist, wchar_t *word) > { wchar_t buffer[max_word_len+2]; > buffer[max_word_len+2]=0; > > > > if(wcsstr(wordlist,buffer)==0)

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:40:31 +0100 Eirik Øverby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a few exceptions to this rule: The courier authdaemon > ports, for instance, are notorious for overwriting my > carefully-crafted configuration files when upgrading. I loathe those Then I hope you have filed a

Re: gcc -O2 error

2008-03-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
Mikael Ikivesi wrote: On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:39:32 +0100 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, did you consider perhaps following this advice? ;-) Kris Yes I did. The reason I send to this list also is that in make.conf manual says: CFLAGS(str) Controls the compiler setting

Re: gcc -O2 error

2008-03-23 Thread Mikael Ikivesi
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:39:32 +0100 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, did you consider perhaps following this advice? ;-) > > Kris > Yes I did. The reason I send to this list also is that in make.conf manual says: CFLAGS(str) Controls the compiler setting when compiling C c

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Eirik Øverby
On Mar 23, 2008, at 08:28, Matthew Seaman wrote: Freddie Cash wrote: All that's really needed is a more formalised process for handling upgrading config files, with as much as possible managed via the ports framework itself. Something that dictates the name of the config file, and that com

Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements

2008-03-23 Thread Matthew Seaman
Freddie Cash wrote: All that's really needed is a more formalised process for handling upgrading config files, with as much as possible managed via the ports framework itself. Something that dictates the name of the config file, and that compares the config file from the port against the instal