On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 20:59 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Anders Nordby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > conf.d (custom configuration)
> > sites-available (virtualhost configuration)
> > sites-enabled (symlinks for enabled virtualhosts)
> > mods-available (availabl
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Freddie Cash writes:
>Oh, gods, please, no! That is one of the things I absolutely hate
>about Debian (and its derivatives). There are some packages on Debian
>where they use separate text files for each configuration option
>(ProFTPd, for examples). It is a huge
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Anders Nordby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:28:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >> If this thing can be solved (I'm not programmer so I don't know) I can
> >> donate some amount of $ for development. I think that this would make
> >>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:28:35PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>> If this thing can be solved (I'm not programmer so I don't know) I can
>> donate some amount of $ for development. I think that this would make
>> lots of people happy.
> I have to admit I see no way how the problem could
> be s
Mikael Ikivesi wrote:
Hi
I am running uptodate RELENG_7. It has gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719
[FreeBSD].
I tried to track down segfaults from my code and I accidentaly found a
optimization error. Code did not segfault when compiled without
optimization but crashed when -O2 was used.
I tried to trac
Hi
I am running uptodate RELENG_7. It has gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719
[FreeBSD].
I tried to track down segfaults from my code and I accidentaly found a
optimization error. Code did not segfault when compiled without
optimization but crashed when -O2 was used.
I tried to track it I could make the gc
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, there's some historic reports of this kind of issue, with
> different issues. Some are due to users dotfiles, others are due to
> mixed gcc versions on the system (users trying to use gcc 3.4 with gcc
> 4.x fla
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 05:08:57PM +0100, TooMany Secrets wrote:
> > $ echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' > tmp.c
> > $ gcc -Wchar-subscripts -o x tmp.c
>
> This works fine under a normal user. Under root... also!!!
> (note that I really make a strong verification about ccache use;
> deleted fr
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ gcc -v
[toomany] [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
> $ echo 'int
Hi Alex,
On Saturday 22 March 2008 11:29:33 Alex Popa wrote:
> Sorry for the big delay, but here are the traces you requested.
don't worry, you are a great help!
Could you try the attached patch? I missed the fact that you are using
FASTROUTE in your setup. There is obviously a problem with i
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 04:19:31PM +0100, TooMany Secrets wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My make.conf flags:
> > > CPUTYPE?=prescott
> > > CFLAGS= -O -pipe
> > > CXXFLAGS+= -O -DNO_MALLOC_EXTRAS
> > > COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
> > > #CCACH
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM, TooMany Secrets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, you really should be using "?=" operators on those optimisation
> > flags, in case something else overrides them. Yes, I know what the
> > documentation in share/examples/etc/make.conf says, but I still
>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My make.conf flags:
> > CPUTYPE?=prescott
> > CFLAGS= -O -pipe
> > CXXFLAGS+= -O -DNO_MALLOC_EXTRAS
> > COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
> > #CCACHE
> > CC=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc
> > CXX=/usr/local/libexec/ccache
Ken Chen wrote:
Hello,
I upgrade from 6.2 to 7.0 on this Intel SR2400 server, then it panic after
mounting storage when boot with 7.0 kernel.
I don't leave enough space for core dumping, so I should get nothing more
for the panic. Any way to gather enough information for bug reporting?
Config
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:09:31PM +0100, TooMany Secrets wrote:
> System csup from today at 13:20 (aprox.).
>
> My make.conf flags:
> CPUTYPE?=prescott
> CFLAGS= -O -pipe
> CXXFLAGS+= -O -DNO_MALLOC_EXTRAS
> COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
> #CCACHE
> CC=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc
> CXX=/usr/local/li
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:14:04AM -0700, John Pettitt wrote:
> I just installed 7-STABLE on a new dual/quad machine based on a supermicro
> motherboard - it works fine except that it's not seeing the second network
> interface (em driver) - is there a magic incantation to make this work?
What S
2008/3/22, Per olof Ljungmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Have Thinkpad T42 with 2200 wireless that USED to work with if_iwi and
> 7-STABLE, now regardless of what I do I cannot associate with access
> points (works with XP). Are there any changes made that I cannot see
> during the la
Hi!
My system:
FreeBSD toomany.toomany.net 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #1: Thu
Mar 20 20:46:21 CET 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TOOMANY i386
System csup from today at 13:20 (aprox.).
My make.conf flags:
CPUTYPE?=prescott
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
CXXFLAGS+= -O -DNO_MALLOC_EXTRAS
COPT
Hi,
Have Thinkpad T42 with 2200 wireless that USED to work with if_iwi and
7-STABLE, now regardless of what I do I cannot associate with access
points (works with XP). Are there any changes made that I cannot see
during the last few months that changed operation? Have setup
loader.conf accord
I just installed 7-STABLE on a new dual/quad machine based on a
supermicro motherboard - it works fine except that it's not seeing the
second network interface (em driver) - is there a magic incantation to
make this work?
FreeBSD echelon.localnet 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Mar 21
20 matches
Mail list logo
