On Friday 11 January 2008 10:31:47 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:44:20PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Ian West wrote:
> >> dd if=/dev/zero bs=32768 of=junkfile count=10 seems to do it quite
> >> reliably on all the boxes I have tested ?
> >
> >I am unable to reproduce th
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:44:20PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>Ian West wrote:
>> dd if=/dev/zero bs=32768 of=junkfile count=10 seems to do it quite
>> reliably on all the boxes I have tested ?
>
>I am unable to reproduce this on 7.0.
I can't reproduce it on 6.3-PRERELEASE/amd64 with 1GB RAM.
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:15 PM 1/11/2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Just to summarize some discussion we had off-list, this problem is now
resolved. It turned out to have two causes:
1) sysbench on linux was defaulting to using a unix domain socket to
communicate with pgsql, but FreeBSD was usin
At 12:15 PM 1/11/2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Just to summarize some discussion we had off-list, this problem is
now resolved. It turned out to have two causes:
1) sysbench on linux was defaulting to using a unix domain socket to
communicate with pgsql, but FreeBSD was using TCP to 127.0.0.1.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:15:08 +0100
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Krassimir reports that with these two fixes, the standard 7.0 kernel
> has performance:
>
> #threads transactions/sec
> 1 755
> 8 7129
> 406580
> 100 6768
>
> compared
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:32:12 +0100, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> J.R. Oldroyd wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:38:29 +0100, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, same requests as to the others then.
> >>
> >
> > I presume you mean hwpmc...
>
> LOCK_PROFILING, sch
Ian West wrote:
Hello, I have noticed while benchmarking a system with a fair bit of ram
(3G usable of 4G installed) that when using a very large file (3G
upwards) in a simple benchmark it will cause the system to swap, even
though the actual process does not show in top to be using a lot of
memo
> >> I have read all related threads about performance problems with multi
> >> core systems but still have no idea what to do to make thinks better.
> >> Below are results of testing postgresql on HP DL380G5 using sysbench.
> >> The results are comparable to:
> >> http://blog.insidesystems.net/art
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
I have read all related threads about performance problems with multi
core systems but still have no idea what to do to make thinks better.
Below are results of testing postgresql on HP DL380G5 using sysbench.
The results are comparable to:
http://blog.insidesystems.ne
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:44:36PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
> Hi stable@
> I have sticky sound flow on 2 different slowish laptops running 7
> Stable, Sound plays for a few secs, then breaks for a fraction &
> resumes, repeatedly. I guess fault is not sound config, hence I'm
> not posting multi
Attached is the stack...
I was trying to back up a DVD (acd0) to a file-system (on ad8). According to
the ``systat 1 -vm'' window frozen on my screen, the system was processing an
awful lot of interrupts, when it paniced.
I have the entire vmcore. Attached is the debugger's stack of it. The ker
Hi stable@
I have sticky sound flow on 2 different slowish laptops running 7
Stable, Sound plays for a few secs, then breaks for a fraction &
resumes, repeatedly. I guess fault is not sound config, hence I'm
not posting multimedia@, but stable@ where I've seen other Sticky
7 response topics.
I ha
Anish Mistry wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David E. Thiel wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 11:12:26PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
FWIW, the problem remains for me. Still terrible performance
during compiles.
OK. Instead of going over all of the us
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Not that I'm aware of. gtar works but libarchive tar fails on
the file it created.
Yes, in 6.2. What about the report that it works in 6.3?
Sorry didn't see that, out of order emails coming through no doubt :)
Glad to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Kris Kennaw
15 matches
Mail list logo
