Re: RELENG7 using lpt causes panic

2008-01-07 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 03:08:57AM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote: > I've recently switched some of my home systems to RELENG7. > > All seemed fairly well until I tried printing a CUPS test page on my > backup and print server to an elderly Laserjet IIIp, where I seem to > have a reproducible panic

Re: RELENG7 using lpt causes panic

2008-01-07 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 07 January 2008 10:08:57 pm Adrian Wontroba wrote: > I've recently switched some of my home systems to RELENG7. > > All seemed fairly well until I tried printing a CUPS test page on my > backup and print server to an elderly Laserjet IIIp, where I seem to > have a reproducible panic. It

Re: RELENG7 using lpt causes panic

2008-01-07 Thread Michael Proto
Adrian Wontroba wrote: > I've recently switched some of my home systems to RELENG7. > > All seemed fairly well until I tried printing a CUPS test page on my > backup and print server to an elderly Laserjet IIIp, where I seem to > have a reproducible panic. It has happened twice. This is painful,

RELENG7 using lpt causes panic

2008-01-07 Thread Adrian Wontroba
I've recently switched some of my home systems to RELENG7. All seemed fairly well until I tried printing a CUPS test page on my backup and print server to an elderly Laserjet IIIp, where I seem to have a reproducible panic. It has happened twice. This is painful, as I have a big home fileystem (s

routing table and PPP

2008-01-07 Thread Thiago Pollachini
Hi all, I set up freebsd 7 b4 with ppp server for PPPoE incoming requests but i see a problem. When the user disconnect, the tunnel is closed but the route of his address is not removed from routing table, then, when we try to connect again with the same user (same address) the connection is refu

Re: overheating Thinkpad X60s with 7.0-RC1

2008-01-07 Thread Nathan Lay
Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote: On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 21:42 +0100, Johannes Dieterich wrote: Thanks for that reply! :-) On 1/7/08, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First -- the disclaimer -- mine is X60 (not X60s), but with 1.83GHz 32-bit CPU, so it should be so

Re: overheating Thinkpad X60s with 7.0-RC1

2008-01-07 Thread Nathan Lay
Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote: On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 20:22 -0500, Nathan Lay wrote: Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote: On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:58 +0100, Johannes Dieterich wrote: On 1/6/08, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Jan 06, 20

Re: overheating Thinkpad X60s with 7.0-RC1

2008-01-07 Thread Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 21:42 +0100, Johannes Dieterich wrote: > Thanks for that reply! :-) > > On 1/7/08, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > First -- the disclaimer -- mine is X60 (not X60s), but with 1.83GHz > > 32-bit CPU, so it should be somewhat similar to you

Re: Sun Fire X2100 SATA problem [was - sun x2100 gmirror problem]

2008-01-07 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Miroslav Lachman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We're using gmirror on our sun fire x2100 and FreeBSD 6.1-p10. Some days ago I found this in the logs: Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 kernel: ad6: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=612960533 Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 kernel:

Interspersed logging output and workarounds

2008-01-07 Thread Jonathan Chen
Hi, I'm running 7-PRERELEASE on amd64, and have the problem of interspersed logging output, eg: Jan 8 09:40:55 osiris kernel: <<11101>0>iippfw:f w: 3830080 0D eDneyny UUDDPP 11929.21.681.61.81.0:15.35130 2:254.305.03. 25212:543.530 .0o.u2t5 1:vi5a 3x5l3 0i A search on the list archives s

Re: overheating Thinkpad X60s with 7.0-RC1

2008-01-07 Thread Johannes Dieterich
Thanks for that reply! :-) On 1/7/08, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > First -- the disclaimer -- mine is X60 (not X60s), but with 1.83GHz > 32-bit CPU, so it should be somewhat similar to yours. At the moment it > has USB drivers loaded, which tends to bump CPU utiliza

Re: Mixer default values not restored

2008-01-07 Thread Jouke Witteveen
On Jan 7, 2008 8:02 PM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 07 January 2008 08:32:49 am Jouke Witteveen wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2008 7:30 AM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday 02 January 2008 08:35:40 am Jouke Witteveen wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > >

Re: Mixer default values not restored

2008-01-07 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 07 January 2008 08:32:49 am Jouke Witteveen wrote: > On Jan 7, 2008 7:30 AM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 02 January 2008 08:35:40 am Jouke Witteveen wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 7.0 RC1 with the following in my kernel configuration:

Re: overheating Thinkpad X60s with 7.0-RC1

2008-01-07 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:55:32PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > I won't even bother mentioning what happens when I run something that's > CPU or GPU intensive. I haven't had any crashes, but in some cases, > I've seen the GPU temperatures reach over 80C -- completely > unacceptable, and borderi

Re: kmem_map too small under ZFS

2008-01-07 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 1/7/08, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > vm.kmem_size="512M" > > vm.kmem_size_max="512M" > > I have similar to this in mine... > > vm.kmem_size=629145600 > vm.kmem_size_max=629145600 > > which is about 600 meg - the machine has 2 gig of RAM. > > > vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable="1" > > vfs.z

Re: Mixer default values not restored

2008-01-07 Thread Jouke Witteveen
On Jan 7, 2008 7:30 AM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 January 2008 08:35:40 am Jouke Witteveen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 7.0 RC1 with the following in my kernel configuration: > > --- > > device sound > > device snd_emu10kx > > ---

Re: Cannot mount a nfs share after doing a snapshot

2008-01-07 Thread Julian H. Stacey
I too saw mountd / exports just fail on 2 systems upgraded in last days from 7RC4 to newest 7 Stable (CTM src-7 80, received here Jan 6 15:15 CEST=GMT+01:00). I am not using .snap snapshot. My other AMD & NFS on other FreeBSD-4 & 6 hosts remains OK. AMD & NFS as client & server was working till t

Re: Cannot mount a nfs share after doing a snapshot

2008-01-07 Thread Jose Garcia Juanino
El lunes 07 de enero a las 12:06:50 CET, Greg Byshenk escribió: > > # file /.snap/now > > /.snap/now: Unix Fast File system [v2] (little-endian) last mounted on > > /, last written at Sun Jan 6 16:24:19 2008, clean flag 1, readonly flag > > 1, number of blocks 130721, number of data blocks 126520,

Re: kmem_map too small under ZFS

2008-01-07 Thread Michael Haro
I have the following in /boot/loader.conf and it seems to be doing well for me on FreeBSD-i386 with 1G RAM. vm.kmem_size="512M" vm.kmem_size_max="512M" vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable="1" vfs.zfs.arc_max="150M" kern.maxvnodes="40" Most of these settings came from various mailing list postings. It's

Re: kmem_map too small under ZFS

2008-01-07 Thread Pete French
> vm.kmem_size="512M" > vm.kmem_size_max="512M" I have similar to this in mine... vm.kmem_size=629145600 vm.kmem_size_max=629145600 which is about 600 meg - the machine has 2 gig of RAM. > vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable="1" > vfs.zfs.arc_max="150M" > kern.maxvnodes="40" now these I havent got -

kmem_map too small under ZFS

2008-01-07 Thread Pete French
I have been experimenting with ZFS recently, and have been seeing the occasional reboot with the above error. A quick google shows that this is a known problem, but that it should go away if you increase kernel memory. I have done this, but I am still seeing the problem - and not uunder high load e

Re: Cannot mount a nfs share after doing a snapshot

2008-01-07 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 05:38:30PM +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > El domingo 06 de enero a las 15:41:21 CET, Greg Byshenk escribi?: > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:28:31PM +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > > > > > I have a 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 system with a nfs server, with an unique > > >

Re: overheating Thinkpad X60s with 7.0-RC1

2008-01-07 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:22:48 -0500 Nathan Lay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do notice, however, that FreeBSD seemed to never use the fan to its > potential on any of the Thinkpads I've used (T40 for 3 years, T43 for 3 > years). Comparably, Windows XP would rev the fan far higher than even > s