TB --- 2007-05-10 03:04:37 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-05-10 03:04:37 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2007-05-10 03:04:37 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-05-10 03:05:10 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2007-05-10 03:05:10
:> You could also look at the INSTALL guides for (early versions of?)
:> Dragonfly, it taught me how to install a BSD system from
:> scratch, using
:> only what's in base of liveCD :)
:...
:
:We have set up a boot CD (or pxeboot/nfs environment) where we can run a
:Ruby script that will take direc
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> % obiwan:root# cat /boot.config
> % -D
> % obiwan:root# grep ttyd0 /etc/ttys
> % ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup on secure
>
> This works correctly but on startup, when the kernel probes sio0,
> I get "Got hangup
Hi there,
Please Cc: me when replying.
% obiwan:root# cat /boot.config
% -D
% obiwan:root# grep ttyd0 /etc/ttys
% ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup on secure
This works correctly but on startup, when the kernel probes sio0,
I get "Got hangup signal". Is it expected? I think I
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 03:40, Matthew X. Economou wrote:
> >> Could anyone recommend a good guide for developing one's
> own mfsroot
> >> images suitable for recovery or scripted installation (not using
> >> sysinstall)? It appears that one could d
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:54:15AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I've been running around upgrading some boxes to 6.2 from 4.11 using
> the directions in UPDATING. I noticed that in the 4.x to 5.x step
> it's basically mandatory to install the new bootlo
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> * Oliver Peter, 2007-04-26 :
>
> > > My problem is the same as Beni's. Splash screen appears and hangs.
> > > I have to press power button to turn off and on my laptop.
> > > Didn't try ctrl+alt+del though.
> >
> > I have the same p
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 03:40, Matthew X. Economou wrote:
>> Could anyone recommend a good guide for developing one's own mfsroot
>> images suitable for recovery or scripted installation (not using
>> sysinstall)? It appears that one could develop a simplified
>> network-
> Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 01:54:15 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a quicky...
>
> I've been running around upgrading some boxes to 6.2 from 4.11 using the
> directions in UPDATING. I noticed that in the 4.x to 5.x step
Thomas Hurst wrote:
> I'm seeing this sort of thing too -- I do have swap, but it's not being
> used by these processes (swapoff -a didn't do anything to them):
>
> Mem: 1672M Active, 5337M Inact, 279M Wired, 400M Cache, 215M Buf, 74M Free
> Swap: 10G Total, 12K Used, 10G Free
>
> 1251
Martin Dieringer wrote:
> # ntpq -p
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
> ==
> *time192.53.103.108 2 u 19 64 77 91.454 301.926 860.104
>
> and the clo
* Bill LeFebvre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The <> are only used when the process flag PS_INMEM is clear, which
> is supposed to indicate that the process is or is not "in memory".
> This flag is only ever cleared in swapout, called from swapout_procs.
> My bet is that the processes are being
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Martin Dieringer wrote:
> > > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > > Are you sure that your /etc/ntp.conf ist correct?
> > >
> > > # cat /etc/ntp.conf
> > >
> > > server time.fu-berlin.de iburst maxpoll 9
> > > driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift
> > > l
Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I use 'top' command to check my system, some processes are shown like
> ''. The manual told these processes are swapped out.
Actually it means that they're not mapped into RAM, but in
practice that should be the same.
Just out of cusiosity I grepped th
Ken Chen wrote:
When I use 'top' command to check my system, some processes are shown like
''. The manual told these processes are swapped out.
But my problem is .. I don't have swapping device (swapoff -a). Where are
they swapped to ?
last pid: 29144; load averages: 0.69, 0.67, 0.82
up 19+
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[...]
I don't think it makes much sense to benchmark mfs.
It is a known fact that a real tmpfs (like Solaris and
Linux have) would be better. I think it's even listed
on the FreeBSD ideas web page, but nobody is actively
working on it, AFAIK. On the other hand, I'm not 100%
16 matches
Mail list logo
