On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:53:08AM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> Hi, Oleg,
>
> Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
> > ??? LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [...]
> >> I'm not very sure if this is specific to one disk controller. Actually
> >> I got some occasional reports about similar hangs on amd64 6.2-RELEASE
>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:53:32AM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
> LI Xin wrote:
> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> > >>> At work, amoungst my stable of old compute
Hi, Oleg,
Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
> Цитирую LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
>> I'm not very sure if this is specific to one disk controller. Actually
>> I got some occasional reports about similar hangs on amd64 6.2-RELEASE
>> (slightly patched version) that most of processes stuck in the 'ufs'
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> I would suspect the mlx controller. There is several processes (for instance,
> 988, 50918) waiting for completion of block read, and processes in the "ufs"
> states are the result of the lock cascade, IMHO.
It may be possible that controller is not guilty.
You can easil
Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
> [ ... ]
> I reported simular issue for FreeBSD 6.2 in audit-trail for
> kern/104406:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&cat=
>
> and there should be a thread related to this. Briefly, I
> suspects that this is
> related to nullfs filesystems on my s
LI Xin wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >>> At work, amoungst my stable of old computers running
> FreeBSD, I have a
> >>> Fujitsu M800 - a 4 Zeon SMP process
On 2007-Apr-24 09:32:06 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My box has 128MB memory, far enough for the task.
If you are regularly running out of space, then maybe not - at least
without tuning some parameters.
How much swap space do you actually have and what is your box tryin
Matthew Jacob wrote:
Is there any news on the performance of this card?
I personally have not been able to reproduce the problem. It seems to
occur whether in Integrated Raid or not. It seems to be related to
specific backplanes and drives. It's an important problem to solve I
agree.
We hav
As a data point, I was seeing the same problems, but reverting to
atapi-cam.c rev 1.42.2.2 works here too.
Eric
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
Цитирую LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >>> At work, amoungst my stable of old computers running FreeBSD, I have
> a
> >>> Fujitsu M800
my dmesg has errors i guess. i am sorta new @ this so umm..
here is a dmesg output:
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEA
> This problem appear in my system after updating system and ports on
> April, 06.
> K3b hangs either after loading splash screen or after eject wrote media
> from device.
Aside that new atapi-cam.c is proven to work, I'd like to know if command
line works or not? K3b needs cdrtools in background.
Dear FreeBSD users and developers:
The BSD Canada Conference (BSDCan) is just a few weeks away -- May 18-19 in
Ottawa, Canada. This is a great opportunity to meet up with other FreeBSD
developers and users, learn about exciting work taking place in FreeBSD, and
it's also a chance to talk abo
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>>> At work, amoungst my stable of old computers running FreeBSD, I have a
>>> Fujitsu M800 - a 4 Zeon SMP processor with 4 GB of memory. Thi
It's a broken load balancer which is returning the
parent's SOA record for queries for mail.wtplaw.com.
Named correctly rejects this as a garbage response.
It also appears to only responds to A/ queries.
As for Solaris' host it may/may not be maki
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It's a broken load balancer which is returning the
> parent's SOA record for queries for mail.wtplaw.com.
> Named correctly rejects this as a garbage response.
>
> It also appears to only responds to A/ queries.
>
>
Sorry following up on my own post: a correction and some further info:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Ian Smith wrote:
[..]
> At (one set of) the listed NServers:
>
> ===
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.4 <<>> @lp1.wtplaw.com. mail.wtplaw.com.
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answe
Hello,
I have a little understanding problem:
My box has 128MB memory, far enough for the task.
After a few days I always see some processes dying because:
+swap_pager_getswapspace(2): failed
+pid 48211 (perl5.8.8), uid 58, was killed: out of swap space
Why won't for example the 21MB Buf get fre
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Howard Leadmon wrote:
> OK, now I am a bit stumped, so wanted to post here in hopes someone might
> have an idea. First off the FBSD machine in question is an x86 server running
> 6.2-STABLE from a supped from a few weeks ago, so is fairly current.
>
> I use said machi
19 matches
Mail list logo
