On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:54:42PM +0300 I heard the voice of
Artem Kuchin, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Theoretically, what would be the procedure?
- Do a full cross-build of the amd64 world/kernel.
- newfs your swap partition (or an extra partition/drive).
- installworld/kernel the amd64 stuff ont
On Mar 9, 2007, at 03:41, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual
P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID
controller.
It has been working OK (although
On Mar 9, 2007, at 03:41, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed 6.2-RELEASE on a Supermicro 6013P-8 server, a dual
P4-Xeon 2.4ghz with 4GB ECC memory and an asr driven SCSI RAID
controller.
It has been working OK (although
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Joao Barros wrote:
There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for
example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and
isp1 are connected to two switches...
It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management
The GEOM multipath code hasn't been MFC'd yet.
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Ivan Voras wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhe
On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
>> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
>> discussion for Linux in wh
Hi,
The commit below to ichwd.c, breaks the watchdog on a number
of Intel boards I tried it against. (ICH5 and ICH7) The module
loads, but the box never reboots after sending a sig 11 to watchdogd
ichwd module loaded
ichwd0: on isa0
Reverting to the version of ichwd.c prior to you
On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
should be a read-write and another "r
On 2007-Mar-09 22:16:36 +0300, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via
>csup and
>source build?
>>...
>>>Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself.
>>
>>Definitely.
>>
>>>Theoretically, what would
Joao Barros wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
>> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
>> discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
>> should
On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Eric Anderson wrote:
I've got a VIA C3 Samuel myself, and it is fine for what it is,
which is a low-power clone of the Pentium-MMX in terms of
capabilities; the newer C3 Nehemiah is roughly comparable to a
P2, plus SSE and the extra AES/RNG crypto stuff. Look a
Hi all,
some time ago Yar Tikhiy posted a message to this list in which he
described a way to directly update a 4.11 box to 6.2. The message can be
found here:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=190896+0+archive/2007/freebsd-stable/20070225.freebsd-stable
HTH,
Philipp
--
www.famil
On 03/09/07 12:55, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Eric Anderson wrote:
[ ... ]
Dunno. I was merely trying to keep things honest, since what was
communicated (whether intended or not) was that a C3 isn't modern,
and is akin to a Pentium, which it isn't.
I've got a VIA C3 Sa
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:30:01AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Artem Kuchin wrote:
> >
> >> Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without
> >> upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step?
> >
> >
> >
> > tried twice - did not work, but go
On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Eric Anderson wrote:
[ ... ]
Dunno. I was merely trying to keep things honest, since what was
communicated (whether intended or not) was that a C3 isn't modern,
and is akin to a Pentium, which it isn't.
I've got a VIA C3 Samuel myself, and it is fine for what it
Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via
csup and
source build?
...
Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself.
Definitely.
Theoretically, what would be the procedure?
1) Backup system.
2) Download amd64 install ISO and burn to CD
3) Boot from
On 2007-Mar-09 20:54:42 +0300, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via
>>>csup and
>>>source build?
...
>Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself.
Definitely.
>Theoretically, what would be the procedure?
As you may know, I've been sending all sorts of messages trying to get
help running FreeBSD 6.x on this AMD Opteron-based blade (LS21). Now
I've managed to get it to work mostly as I want it, so here's some maps
for future explorers.
First, things that don't work:
* 64-bit kernels. With or withou
Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via
csup and
source build?
AFAIK nobody has lived to tell the tale (or at least I didn't see any
followups from people who claimed they'd try it). In any case it would
be better to migrate it via binary reinstall (the same as inst
What's the basis for your suspicion?
My memory might play tricks on me, but i think I remember that i tried to
upgrade
from 4.1 to 5.3 longtime ago and it did not work. I had to up to 5.0 and the to
5.3.
But that might be just some weird client install (i did not install freebsd on
that box
o
Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via
> csup and
> source build?
AFAIK nobody has lived to tell the tale (or at least I didn't see any
followups from people who claimed they'd try it). In any case it would
be better to migrate it via binary re
If memory serves me right, Artem Kuchin wrote:
>
>> Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without
>> upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step?
>
>
>
> tried twice - did not work, but going to 5 and then to 6 was not a problem.
> But i suspect than going from older
Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without
upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step?
tried twice - did not work, but going to 5 and then to 6 was not a problem.
But i suspect than going from older 4.x to newer 5.x (like 5.4) might not work
and it might need
Hi!
I confirm that the problem exists and proposed solution works.
I've just installed a router with ASUS NX1001 PCI card
and have been forced to rebuild kernel with device id
manually added to the driver. Only then the card was attached by the driver.
Please commit this.
Eugene Grosbein
__
Ivan Voras ha scritto:
I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable
It was backported 34 hours ago ;-)
My card identifies itself as 2462s, in an IBM blade.
Nobody tested the new code with a 246x card, but probably is the same as
242x (tested).
--
Alex Dupre
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Ivan Voras ha scritto:
>> I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable
>
> It was backported 34 hours ago ;-)
That was fast :)
I've cvsupped before trying to get the blade to work (needed SerDes
support for bce cards) but wow, it has been almost three da
Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without
upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step?
Michael Grant
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, sen
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:08:25PM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
>
> >>Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same
> >>symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD
> >>Opteron(tm)
> >>Pr
On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Jens Fallesen wrote:
One issue I have is that the embedded management software can run
on NIC 1 only. And once FreeBSD detects this, the embedded
management software is disabled. Does anyone know of a way to make
FreeBSD detect NIC 0 only?
Did you spring for t
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:22:38AM +0300, Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
Sometimes (once a week approximately) I have a problem with the same
symptoms described here on SMP FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with dual AMD Opteron(tm)
Processor 850:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104406&cat=
Sometimes (app
On Mar 8, 2007, at 7:14 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Failing that, if you need to preserve anything that is emitted from
the program, nohup is probably your best bet. If it isn't going to
spit anything out on the terminal, take a look at daemon(8), which
you probably will want to run with the -f
Hi,
we have performance problems with our FreeBSD 6.2 based NFS server.
Picture the following setup:
FreeBSD Client ---> Samba-Server ---> NFS-Server
all three machines are running FreeBSD 6.2 (the same image). The NFS
server is configured with 16 nfsd. sysctl.conf has
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=6
On Mar 9, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Thomas Hurst wrote:
Also, if anyone knows which ethernet ports they put in that'd be
helpful. I'd avoid them if they had broadcom chips :-(
2 nVidia nForce nve(4)'s and 2 Intel Pro/1000 em(4)'s. Quite a step
back from the quad em(4)'s in !M2's, but 2 usable NIC's
Maybe someone could help me.
I have a machine with 4GB of RAM 128MB of which is wasted and i really
need 2 gigs more.
This is a heavy duty production server with a lot of jails and custom scripts,
etc..
and i am afraid i cannot reinstall all from scratch. Furthermore it is located
in the
dat
* Vivek Khera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Has anyone successfully booted FreeBSD 6 on the new "M2" variants of
> sun's X2100 or X4100 boxes? I have three X4100 original versions that
> works stunningly well (but I don't use the internal disks) with
> FreeBSD 6.1. I was just curious how the new o
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> Since I need it in production, I'll try i386 6.2-release+PAE...
>
> Ok, PAE uniprocessor kernel boots fine, finds all the memory but I can't
> create (clone) a vlan device ("ifconfig vlan0 create"). It fails with an
> error in SIOCIFCREATE.
>
> Since cr
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Since I need it in production, I'll try i386 6.2-release+PAE...
Ok, PAE uniprocessor kernel boots fine, finds all the memory but I can't
create (clone) a vlan device ("ifconfig vlan0 create"). It fails with an
error in SIOCIFCREATE.
Since creating vlan0 worked in amd64 mode (
Generally speaking, the LSI-Logic cards are faster, at least for 2Gb,
in terms of IOPS.
However, the LSI-Logic firmware is less capable of coping with
complicated topologies and the mpt(4) driver is less mature than
isp(4).
Another thing to keep in mind is that for new cards (as opposed to
'EBay
38 matches
Mail list logo
