Hi,
I'm looking for a recommendation on a small form factor system. I've looked at
some of the models from AOpen , Shuttle and Microstar. I'd like an AMD 64 (or
dual core) box (lower cost) with SATA/EIDE disk support. I plan on running
FreeBSD mostly and occasionally Red Hat or Fedora for cust
Hi,
I feel the mount_union manpage isn't 100% correct anymore, especially the
the BUGS section ? Or do the things there still apply ?
Martin
Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurl
On Thursday, libxine was updated in the ports collection to version 1.1.4
Unfortunately, this seems to cause some kind of compiler-suite error on
6.2-STABLE/amd64.
dsputil.c:3826: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 62 10 12 0 (set (reg:SI 0 ax [61])
(subreg:SI (plus:DI (subreg:DI (reg:SI
Michael Nottebrock schrieb:
> Has anyone ever managed to get some USB 2.0 - like speeds out of ehci anyway?
> I'm not seeing quite such abysmal performance as Kevin did, but I don't even
> need to benchmark to be certain that Windows does *much* better with the
> devices I own.
Actually let me b
On Saturday, 17. February 2007 11:39, Rink Springer wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > So I tried recompiling libc with debug cflags ("-g3 -O -pipe"), but this
> > only makes the backtrace in gdb much longer, but still without any
> > fu
Has anyone ever managed to get some USB 2.0 - like speeds out of ehci anyway?
I'm not seeing quite such abysmal performance as Kevin did, but I don't even
need to benchmark to be certain that Windows does *much* better with the
devices I own. Here are some numbers:
First up, the controller:
eh
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> So I tried recompiling libc with debug cflags ("-g3 -O -pipe"), but this only
> makes the backtrace in gdb much longer, but still without any function names.
Hmm, 'make install' appears to strip the debugging info.
I experimented some more and found something even more funny: A sysctl binary
copied over from a FreeBSD 5.5 machine works (the FreeBSD 6 box with the
segfaulting sysctl has the 5.x compat libraries installed).
So I tried recompiling libc with debug cflags ("-g3 -O -pipe"), but this only
makes
On Saturday, 17. February 2007 10:09, Rink Springer wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 09:47:45AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > I've attached the ktrace output of 'sysctl kern.clockrate' to this
> > message.
>
> Hmm, could you try to rebuild sysctl manually and give that one a
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 09:47:45AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> I've attached the ktrace output of 'sysctl kern.clockrate' to this message.
Hmm, could you try to rebuild sysctl manually and give that one a try?
Maybe there's not something in sync. Something like:
# cd /usr/src/
I have a strange problem on one of my computers: sysctl segfaults when
querying kern.clockrate (and more annoyingly when trying to print
kern.clockrate when run with -a). I cannot tell for sure when this problem
appeared, the last things I did to the system was putting in an sata harddisk
and e
11 matches
Mail list logo