Jo Rhett wrote:
So I've been searching for hours now, and it appears that short of
reading the C code, there's no documentation of the boot2 menu prompt.
Sure, it says drive:driver(unit,slice,part)
But no combination of those three that I can find actually works.
There's two LUNs:
drive 0
On Thu, January 11, 2007 10:00 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on
> big fiber channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid
> controllers.
I'd be very surprised if you can't. You c
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:28:29PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> >On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
> >
> >Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on
> >big fiber channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid
> >>
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
Since we're going to be stuck with old BIOSes for a long time after
2TB is a cheap disk drive at [store], is anyone considering doing
the work to make GPT co-exist with an MBR block?
It is already possible for them to coexist. It's not uncommon
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
I just had a look at that documentation. Not far before the referenced
pages it says to hit "ALT-3" to enter the BIOS configuration, and then
describes the procedure for creating a unit including creating a "boot
unit". No
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
I just had a look at that documentation. Not far before the
referenced pages it says to hit "ALT-3" to enter the BIOS
configuration, and then describes the procedure for creating a unit
including creating a "boot unit". No operating system
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
The pages I mention are for the 3Ware BIOS, not tw_cli or 3DM2...
I'm looking at the pdf and the screenshots are clearly from the
3Ware BIOS. Check it out...
Sorry, you're right I used the acrobat page numbers instead of the
printed o
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on big
fiber channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid controllers.
I'd be very surprised if you can't. You can certainly
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on big fiber
channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid controllers.
I'd be very surprised if you can't
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on
big fiber channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid
controllers.
I'd be very surprised if you can't. You can certainly do it
with Ar
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on big fiber
channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid controllers.
I'd be very surprised if you can't. You can certainly do it with Areca
(arcmsr(4)), HP (ciss(4)), IBM ServeRAID (ips(4)), alt
Hello!
I had 100% reproducible panic on 6.2RC2 and now I have it on 6.2-RELEASE with
ucom, uplcom.
I have USR Courier V.Everthing External Modem connected with RS232->USB cable
to box.
# dmesg | grep ucom
ucom0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 3
# cat /et
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
I've got ancient AMI Megaraid controllers (Dell PERC 2/Si cards) that
can put multiple logical drives on one RAID set, so I'm surprised that
a modern controller can't.
Funny, that. I miss the old Megaraid controllers. They had features
that the
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
For example, on an Areca 8 port controller, I have 8 disks in a
RAID-6 array, and within that "RAID set", I have three volumes.
The three volumes appear to FreeBSD as da0, da1 and da2, respectively.
CLI> rsf info
I would like to note that
On Jan 11, 2007, at 8:50 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
So I've been searching for hours now, and it appears that short of
reading the C code, there's no documentation of the boot2 menu prompt.
I'd like to add to this that the handbook is riddled full of
undocumented terms, like BIOS Drive #. How do y
So I've been searching for hours now, and it appears that short of
reading the C code, there's no documentation of the boot2 menu prompt.
Sure, it says drive:driver(unit,slice,part)
But no combination of those three that I can find actually works.
There's two LUNs:
drive 0: single 2TB slic
Philipp Wuensche wrote:
> Colin Percival wrote:
>> In the end we opted to reduce functionality (the jail startup process is
>> no longer logged to /var/log/console.log inside the jail)
>
> Thats a bummer, when Dirk showed me this problem the first time my ideas
> for fixing this problem without lo
> I'm not sure I understand that quite correct, where is this problem
> appearing?
>
> Other things:
>
> tail is used in line 230: tail -r ${_fstab} | while read _device
> _mountpt _rest; do
>
> If the per-jail fstab is larger than 10 lines, which is the default of
> tail to show, the remaining
Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on big
fiber channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid controllers.
I'd be very surprised if you can't. You can certainly do it with
Areca (arcmsr(4)), HP (ciss(4)), IBM ServeRAID (ips(4)), although
the details vary.
On Jan 11
In the last episode (Jan 11), Jo Rhett said:
> >On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:56:43 -0800 Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Thanks for the reply. The problem is that I have a single 6-drive
> >>(550gb/ea) RAID-5 array. If I split two disks off to make a RAID-1
> >>boot device, I'll lose 1TB of usa
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Hi,
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:56:43 -0800 Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that I have a single 6-drive
(550gb/ea) RAID-5 array. If I split two disks off to make a RAID-1
boot device, I'll lose 1T
Hi,
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:56:43 -0800 Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that I have a single 6-drive
(550gb/ea) RAID-5 array. If I split two disks off to make a RAID-1
boot device, I'll lose 1TB of usable storage.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3
Mark Andrews wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understand that quite correct, where is this problem
>> appearing?
>>
>> Other things:
>>
>> tail is used in line 230: tail -r ${_fstab} | while read _device
>> _mountpt _rest; do
>>
>> If the per-jail fstab is larger than 10 lines, which is the default of
>> t
Colin Percival wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I usually let security advisories speak for themselves, but I want to call
> special attention to this one: If you use jails, READ THE ADVISORY, in
> particular the "NOTE WELL" part below; and if you have problems after applying
> the security patch, LET
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:56:43 -0800 Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that I have a single 6-drive
(550gb/ea) RAID-5 array. If I split two disks off to make a RAID-1
boot device, I'll lose 1TB of usable storage.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Torfinn Ingolf
an ath wl card stops definitely working after showing this messages:
kernel: ath0: discard oversize frame ether type 5e4 flags 3 len 1522 > max
1514
seems this packages are then beeing held in the ath tx buffer, filling it up,
what then depending on the rate or quantity brings the ath card do
Hello Everyone,
I usually let security advisories speak for themselves, but I want to call
special attention to this one: If you use jails, READ THE ADVISORY, in
particular the "NOTE WELL" part below; and if you have problems after applying
the security patch, LET US KNOW -- we do everything we ca
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:56:43 -0800
Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. The problem is that I have a single 6-drive
> (550gb/ea) RAID-5 array. If I split two disks off to make a RAID-1
> boot device, I'll lose 1TB of usable storage.
Hmm, why can't you just make your c
If memory serves me right, Angelo Turetta wrote:
> Am I dreaming, or hasn't the practice always been to rename the RELENG_6
> kernel back to 6-STABLE (or whatever) just after the RELENG_6_x branch?
>
> Right now it's still labelled 6.2-PRERELEASE.
I think we've typically done this in the past bu
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:47:17PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:13, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > The kernel I'm using was built on the following date (thus, src-all
> > for release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 was cvsup'd about an hour prior to this):
> >
> > FreeBSD pentarou.paro
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that I have a single 6-drive
(550gb/ea) RAID-5 array. If I split two disks off to make a RAID-1
boot device, I'll lose 1TB of usable storage.
I just found the "auto carving" feature of the 3ware controller, and
we'll see how that works for my needs.
On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:13, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:40:48PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 January 2007 10:36, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > Yes, I know 4.11 is EOL'd at the end of this month, but hopefully
> > > someone can shed some light on this pr
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:40:12PM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:25:34AM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
> >
> >>Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Hi,
>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:25:34AM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
On Thursday, 11 January 2007 at 11:00:56 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I think I have a decent way to make the application deal with two 1.2
> TB filesystems. Obviously bsdlabel is limited to 2TB, but I should
> be able to mount a partition from the second slice.
>
> So how do I accomplish this?
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:40:48PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 January 2007 10:36, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Yes, I know 4.11 is EOL'd at the end of this month, but hopefully
> > someone can shed some light on this problem anyways. I simply don't
> > have the knowledge of what's go
Am I dreaming, or hasn't the practice always been to rename the RELENG_6
kernel back to 6-STABLE (or whatever) just after the RELENG_6_x branch?
Right now it's still labelled 6.2-PRERELEASE.
Regards,
Angelo.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:25:34AM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I got the following Filesystem:
> >>FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
> >>/dev/da0a
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
/dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
Running of a 3ware 9550, on a
On Saturday 16 December 2006 16:15, hshh wrote:
> New backtrace:
> http://upload.hshh.org/homes/hshh/temp/panic/kgdb-1217.log
>
> Kernel config:
> http://upload.hshh.org/homes/hshh/temp/panic/kernel-1217.log
>
> On 12/15/06, hshh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After recompile kernel with new conf
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 10:36, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Yes, I know 4.11 is EOL'd at the end of this month, but hopefully
> someone can shed some light on this problem anyways. I simply don't
> have the knowledge of what's going on on a low-level to determine
> the cause.
>
> I do have serial
On Monday 18 December 2006 13:11, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 16:58 +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>
> > I've determined that this lock has been destroyed even before glxgears
> > runs - I guess it's just the first attempt at 3D rendering that triggers
> > it?
>
> Indeed, what's h
On Sunday 17 December 2006 23:17, Ma wrote:
> I'm using the newest FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE on our web server (compiled at
> last friday, 06-12-15). But it always crashes these days.
> The following information displayed on the screen with system crashed.
> ===
I think I have a decent way to make the application deal with two 1.2
TB filesystems. Obviously bsdlabel is limited to 2TB, but I should
be able to mount a partition from the second slice.
So how do I accomplish this? Fdisk apparently won't make that second
slice that crosses the 2TB boun
Hi Kris,
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:33 am, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 07:14:41PM +1100, Geoff Roberts wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can consistantly make my system freeze when building makeworld
> > and running dump at the same time. The system actually locks - I
> > have to hit the res
On 1/11/07, Bruce A. Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If memory serves me right, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if the Release is still going to happen today?
>> The release is not going to happen today, but
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
Sysinstall recognized the drive properly and everything looked dandy
during install. However, it turns out that fdisk and bsdlabel both just
chopped off the last partition at 248GB. (why 248gb and not 2tb?)
Wrapping around 2 TiB, probably.
Got any smar
On 1/12/07, Andrew N. Below <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.
I have 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD box I want to use as network
boot and install server for PXE clients.
At this moment I'm experimenting with 4.11-RELEASE-i386-disc1-gnome.iso
and 6.2-RC2-i386-disc1.iso images.
[...]
All is fine if we are
Bruno Ducrot writes:
> [...]
> What specific driver(s) were loaded actually?
> A devinfo might help.
It looks like:
p4tcc0
cpufreq0
Here's a devinfo and a dmesg:
http://shrimp.alerce.com/merlin/merlin.devinfo
http://shrimp.alerce.com/merlin/merlin.dmesg
I'm starting to underst
Hello.
- Original Message -
From: "Rong-en Fan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew N. Below" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: 11 января 2007 г. 20:02
Subject: Re: using md-mounted ISO as NFS root for PXE booting and installing
> [...]
> > All is fine if we are booting into 4.11 (root mounted
Oliver Fromme writes:
> George Hartzell wrote:
> > I'm setting up a Dell Poweredge 750 1U server. A friend is loaning me
> > space in his rack and since his rack usage is limited by power I'd
> > like to be as thrifty as possible.
> >
> > I hooked my kill-a-watt meter up and ran the ma
Hello.
I have 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD box I want to use as network
boot and install server for PXE clients.
At this moment I'm experimenting with 4.11-RELEASE-i386-disc1-gnome.iso
and 6.2-RC2-i386-disc1.iso images.
Related DHCP config section is:
host netboot {
hardware ethernet 00:04:**;
If memory serves me right, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if the Release is still going to happen today?
>> The release is not going to happen today, but will be very soon. My
>> guess is that builds and mi
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the following Filesystem:
> FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
> /dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
>
> Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opte
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 07:14:41PM +1100, Geoff Roberts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can consistantly make my system freeze when building makeworld and
> running dump at the same time. The system actually locks - I have to
> hit the reset switch to bring the system back to life.
>
> I also get a core dum
On Thursday, 11 January 2007 at 15:35:25 +0200, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 January 2007 at 1:04:10 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > So I have a raid array of 2.4TB. And yes, I really need 2.4TB, and no
> > there's no room for another set of disks to boot from.
> > /1g
> > /var 16g
> >
On Thursday, 11 January 2007 at 1:04:10 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> So I have a raid array of 2.4TB. And yes, I really need 2.4TB, and no
> there's no room for another set of disks to boot from.
> /1g
> /var 16g
> /big **everything else
>
> Sysinstall recognized the drive properly and everythi
Jo Rhett wrote:
> Sysinstall recognized the drive properly and everything looked dandy
> during install. However, it turns out that fdisk and bsdlabel both just
> chopped off the last partition at 248GB. (why 248gb and not 2tb?)
Wrapping around 2 TiB, probably.
__
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
But I got those, sorry I should have been more clear, the ones I want to
see documentation on are the ones less commonly used like:
buildenv
check-old
checkdpadd
distribute
distributeworld
distrib-dirs
di
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
But I got those, sorry I should have been more clear, the ones I want to see
documentation on are the ones less commonly used like:
buildenv
check-old
checkdpadd
distribute
distributeworld
distrib-dirs
distribution
hierarchy
regress
release
rereleas
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:49:40AM -0800, George Hartzell wrote:
> Peter Jeremy writes:
> > On Wed, 2007-Jan-10 09:34:21 -0800, George Hartzell wrote:
> > >I hooked my kill-a-watt meter up and ran the machine for a couple of
> > >days and it uses 88 watts (3.90KWH/44.01H).
> >
> > What was it
So I have a raid array of 2.4TB. And yes, I really need 2.4TB, and no
there's no room for another set of disks to boot from.
/1g
/var 16g
/big **everything else
Sysinstall recognized the drive properly and everything looked dandy
during install. However, it turns out that fdisk and bsdlab
George Hartzell wrote:
> I'm setting up a Dell Poweredge 750 1U server. A friend is loaning me
> space in his rack and since his rack usage is limited by power I'd
> like to be as thrifty as possible.
>
> I hooked my kill-a-watt meter up and ran the machine for a couple of
> days and it use
63 matches
Mail list logo
