Kostik Belousov wrote at 06:57 +0300 on Oct 21, 2006:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:25:00AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The nfs_reply is sleeping with the PCATCH set. The question is why
> > > SIGTSTP
> > > does not ca
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 12:18:16PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
J> > A bit more helpfull, but unfortunately not much is a datapoint saying no
J> > problems April 3rd and watchdog timeouts after September 28 RELENG_6. I
J> > know, probably too vague to be of any use, but there it is.
J>
J> Someone
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
J> The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attempted via a
J> number of tests to reproduce this problem, the machine even shares the em
J> interrupt with usb, and yet so far he has been unsuccessful.
I've failed to repr
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:25:00AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >
> > The nfs_reply is sleeping with the PCATCH set. The question is why SIGTSTP
> > does not cause msleep to return with EINTR.
>
> I have not been tracking the thread. but i
On 10/20/06, Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Another thing that might be handy is improving the watchdog timeout
> > message so that it dumps the state of the ICR and ICM registers (and
> > maybe some other interesting driver and/or device state). The timeout
> > implies no inter
On Saturday 21 October 2006 00:05, John E Hein wrote:
> > The problem is in thread_suspend_check(), not the sleepq code.
>
> It happened again (triggered by ctrl-z).
> INVARIANTS & WITNESS provided no help.
>
> Is the problem in thread_suspend_check() known?
> MFC-able from HEAD?
>
I don't think
On Thursday 19 October 2006 18:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> The nfs_reply is sleeping with the PCATCH set. The question is why SIGTSTP
> does not cause msleep to return with EINTR.
I have not been tracking the thread. but if the thread is sleeping with
PCATCH, the SIGTSTP should cause the proce
[...]
> > Another thing that might be handy is improving the watchdog timeout
> > message so that it dumps the state of the ICR and ICM registers (and
> > maybe some other interesting driver and/or device state). The timeout
> > implies no interrupts were delivered for a Long Time (tm). If the
>
It's taken me a while to narrow down what this is, but today I finally
narrowed it all the way down. High network load on the system causes it
to hard lock, nothing but pulling the plug will get any response. The
network interface is nve on an Asus A8N-SLI. The magic bullet appears to be:
bit
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, what sort of torture tests does Intel do, in
> > general, on the em driver on FreeBSD? One thing that I've found which
> > works wonders at exposing race conditions is the Smartbits bi-directional
> > IP forwarding test. Put two NICs in a system, configure for it for
On 10/20/06, Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is exactly the test that Andre and I were running, though only in
> one direction (I think due to lack of hardware for a full test).
Yes, but did you do it with a Smartbits though, or just with a couple of
other FreeBSD machines? Unfortun
Bill Paul wrote:
Yes, but did you do it with a Smartbits though, or just with a couple of
other FreeBSD machines? Unfortunately, a typical FreeBSD system on its own
won't generate frames anywhere near fast enough to really torture test a
gigE interface. At best you might hit around 20 to 300
> Bill Paul wrote:
> > [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> >
> >>On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> >>>
> The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attempted via a
Mike Tancsa a écrit :
At 11:37 AM 10/12/2006, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Matthieu Michaud wrote:
> I rent a small server based on a VIA C7 on which I installed a
> 6.2-PRERELEASE as of today (see dmesg and kernconf attached). It runs
> fairly well but I wonder if it couldn't be faster.
>
> Accord
Oliver Fromme a écrit :
Matthieu Michaud wrote:
> I rent a small server based on a VIA C7 on which I installed a
> 6.2-PRERELEASE as of today (see dmesg and kernconf attached). It runs
> fairly well but I wonder if it couldn't be faster.
>
> According to padlock(4) man page, crypto hardware
On Friday 20 October 2006 12:05, John E Hein wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote at 10:44 -0400 on Oct 19, 2006:
> > On Thursday 19 October 2006 06:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:01:45AM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
> > > > 6.2-PRERELEASE from 20061016 RELENG_6 sources.
> > >
On Thursday 19 October 2006 22:06, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FYI, this change adds 32 bytes to btx leaving 139 bytes free, according
> to btxld(8). As you probably all know, and just as a reminder, size in
> boot2 is at a premium -- it can't go over 8192 bytes as this is the
> boot
On 10/20/06, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Paul wrote:
> [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
>
>>On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>>>
The engineer in our test group has inst
Bill Paul wrote:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attempted via a
number of tests to reproduce
On 10/20/06, Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attemp
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attempted via a
> > > number of tests to reproduce this pr
John Baldwin wrote at 10:44 -0400 on Oct 19, 2006:
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 06:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:01:45AM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
> > > 6.2-PRERELEASE from 20061016 RELENG_6 sources.
> > > Locked vnodes
> > >
> > > 0xc6b7bdd0: tag nfs, type VDIR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:37 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
and my luck has it such that i've not had a lockup since i added
that extra debugging code into the kernel :-) or :-( depending on
your view...
Heisenbugs are great! :)
Am 10.10.2006 um 13:12 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
Doug Ambrisko schrieb:
ambrisko2006-09-09 03:36:57 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/dev/bge if_bge.c if_bgereg.h Log:
Add support to bge(4) to not break IPMI support when the driver
attaches
to it.
Do
Danny Braniss wrote:
> sorry!, it was before morning coffee,
> s/bsdlabel/boot0cfg/
Ah, OK. Yes, that would also work, but only if you have
the boot manager installed. (Strictly speaking it doesn't
change the active slice, which will always be the FreeBSD
slice, but it changes the slice t
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > To change the active slice to, say, the third one, use the
> > > command "fdisk -a 3 /dev/yourdisk". That will request for
> > > confirmation interactively. To do it non-interactively
> > > (e.g. in a script), use "echo a 3 | fdisk -f - /
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:33:38AM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
> I'll get this committed. Thanks for the report and patch!
It has been committed to HEAD; Expect a MFC after a few days.
Thanks!
--
Rink P.W. Springer- http://rink.nu
"Patience is for those who canno
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:45:34AM +0900, Kazuaki ODA wrote:
>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> Yep, devfs as I suspected.
>>>
>>> Keep an eye on the commit logs for when kib@ merges his fix.
>>>
>>> Kris
>> Thanks. I'll test again after the fix is merged into RELENG_6, and post
Danny Braniss wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > To change the active slice to, say, the third one, use the
> > command "fdisk -a 3 /dev/yourdisk". That will request for
> > confirmation interactively. To do it non-interactively
> > (e.g. in a script), use "echo a 3 | fdisk -f - /dev/...".
>
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? (This is on a stable
from yesterday.)
I have -DS115200 in /boot.config, and boot and loader are happily
using this speed. However, the kernel appears to be hardwired to 9600.
After boot, it's still at 9600:
# stty I've recompiled my kernel wit
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
[...]
Indeed I recently ran into this myself. Certain 1U machines which I
acquired had problems booting from USB CDROM. I traced this back to the
USB BIOS trying to LGDT and causing a general protection fault in vm86
mode. I worked around this by PXE booting them on a pr
Hi,
On 10/20/06, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, I need the output from a verbose boot. That will tell if the disks
are seen at all and just the attach phase is failing.
I might have a few ideas depending on the outcome of that...
There is no message about ad0 shown in the boot pr
Lin Jui-Nan Eric wrote:
Hi,
On 10/19/06, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nothing else that that it should work. I dont own any HW that uses this
chip so I cannot test it out. The current support was done for the ARM
port IIRC so things might be different on other systems.
At any rate y
> r00t_0101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to create a true slice on a BSD/Linux node.
> > I know that Solaris uses Solstice DiskSuite or some type of volume
> > management where you are able to reboot to a particular partition
> > through command-line instead of manual reb
> Hi all,
>
> FYI, this change adds 32 bytes to btx leaving 139 bytes free, according
> to btxld(8). As you probably all know, and just as a reminder, size in
> boot2 is at a premium -- it can't go over 8192 bytes as this is the
> boot-sector limit in the BSD disk-label.
>
> Dominic Marks wro
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:45:34AM +0900, Kazuaki ODA wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Yep, devfs as I suspected.
> >
> > Keep an eye on the commit logs for when kib@ merges his fix.
> >
> > Kris
>
> Thanks. I'll test again after the fix is merged into RELENG_6, and post
> the result.
I plan t
r00t_0101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to create a true slice on a BSD/Linux node.
> I know that Solaris uses Solstice DiskSuite or some type of volume
> management where you are able to reboot to a particular partition
> through command-line instead of manual reboot. So wh
Randy Bush wrote:
> do folk actually successfully upgrade
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
> 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
>
> to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using the
> instruc
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > The issue I run into is that I use software raid (vinum in 4.11, gmirror
> > in 6.x), and I don't know of any way to go from one to the other that
> > doesn't involve wiping both drives at the same time.
>
> You can wipe one of the disks, cr
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Paul Allen wrote:
While possibly not advisable in the long term, I ran a 4.x postfix and
cyrus server install on 6.x using compat4 for about six months without
problems. The place where it gets tricky is updating the 4.x binaries,
which requires a 4.x chroot, since I was
40 matches
Mail list logo
