On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:30:28 -0400
Matt Herzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the Subject states, I'm trying to get a FreeBSD 6.1 on sparc64 to be a
> firewall/gateway/nat machine using a IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK kernel.
> (hme0 is the external NIC. hme1 is the internal NIC.)
>
> If I remove the l
John Hay wrote:
-} else if (req == RTM_ADD && SDL(gate)->sdl_alen == 0) {
+} else if (req == RTM_ADD && SDL(gate)->sdl_alen == 0 &&
+(rt->rt_flags & RTF_HOST) != 0) {
ln->ln_state = ND6_LLINFO_INCOMPLETE;
>> Please do MFC. This patch seem
At 03:53 PM 10/2/2006, John Baldwin wrote:
The patch below fixes various nits (mostly adding locking) in most of the
smbus controller drivers we have in the tree. It should apply to both HEAD
and RELENG_6 with the exception that the intpm(4) driver will require the
style fixes to be applied to R
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:21:33PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
> installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the
> versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable. Please let us know what
> course of action you wo
On Monday 02 October 2006 13:52, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Colin Percival wrote:
> > Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> >> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
> >> installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the
> >> versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable.
Does anybody have some news about this thread? Nowadays I prefer to
use 4.11 until I can solve all the issues but its end-of-life is near
and I'm worried.
Thanks,
Marcelo
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:30:38AM -0300, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> > Although it sounds silly,
The patch below fixes various nits (mostly adding locking) in most of the
smbus controller drivers we have in the tree. It should apply to both HEAD
and RELENG_6 with the exception that the intpm(4) driver will require the
style fixes to be applied to RELENG_6 first. If you aren't using intpm
> >
> >> -} else if (req == RTM_ADD && SDL(gate)->sdl_alen == 0) {
> >> +} else if (req == RTM_ADD && SDL(gate)->sdl_alen == 0 &&
> >> +(rt->rt_flags & RTF_HOST) != 0) {
> >> ln->ln_state = ND6_LLINFO_INCOMPLETE;
>
> Please do MFC. This patch seems to have
On Sep 22, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Start by enabling INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT, DEBUG_LOCKS and
DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS, then run 'show lockedvnods' and 'alltrace' in DDB
(spammy, need that serial console), or at least trace the running
processes (show allpcpu) and those listed in lo
The BSDMall will supply servers.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Larry Rosenman
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: 'Colin Percival'; 'Eduardo Meyer'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: EV1 Serve
Colin Percival wrote:
> Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
>> installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the
>> versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable. Please let us know what
>> course of action you would like to ta
Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> "if your server is re-imaged with 6.0 vs the 5.4 version currently
> installed we will not be able to support this. We have found that the
> versions after 5.4 are inherantly unstable. Please let us know what
> course of action you would like to take."
EV1Servers has never b
The issue I'm about to bring up has been discussed back in 2005,
but from what I've read, no solution was ever found:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-April/013399.html
On multi-CPU boxes with SMP enabled in the kernel, ntpd continually
flips between PLL and FLL mode. Now,
Things that makes me nuts.
I have heard before about EV1 saying foolishes about FreeBSD,
specially a big stupid stuff regarding PHP on FreeBSD, now it just
happened to me.
I asked to install the system with FreeBSD 6 instead of their default
5.4. And what I got as a response?
"if your server is
I can also make a shell account available if a dev wants to nose around.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:58:04AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >
> > Closer investigation reveals that I've getting this error:
> >
> > laptop# fsck -B /var
> > background fsck lacks a snapshot
> >
> > So, that explains it. The background fsck isn't running. So, any ideas
> > why it i
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:10:10PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > >
> > > I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so
>
Quoting Marcin Koziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:08:20 +0200):
> After setting hint.pcm.0.buffersize to a bigger value and applying
> patches from http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ (BTW: contrary to the
> message there, these don't seem to be MFC'ed (?))
MFCed to FreeBSD 6, but
Hi all,
this is a followup to:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2006-September/008993.html
and to
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2006-September/009009.html
I upgraded back to RELENG_6 ( 6.2-PRERELEASE). and started testing more
combinations of switches,etc .
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so
> > I've not idea whether this has been discussed already.
> >
> > On my lap
FreeBSD thebighonker.lerctr.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #72: Sat
Sep 30 18:29:33 CDT 2006 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THEBIGHONKER amd64
With a kernel from Saturday, I got this one shot panic:
Script started on Mon Oct 2 05:59:35 2006
# kgdb kernel.0 vmcore.0
[GD
Hi list,
despite recent improvements with the nfs code, client performance still
seems to be a problem. I am getting < 2 MB/sec where i would expect at
least 10 MB/sec.
My Setup:
Machine | ANTSRV1| ANTSRV2
==
Board| Tyan 2882-D
I'm experiencing a problem that seems to be the one reported in:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=103435&cat=i386
I've got a Promise SATA300 TX4 card (note, this is =not= a RAID
card) and two Seagate 300GB SATA drives, in an old (800-MHz
original "Slot A" Athlon) experimental box cur
23 matches
Mail list logo
