Re: NT loader still boot first FreeBSD slice, it could not boot second or another slice

On Friday 29 September 2006 04:26, Daniel Dvořák wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to make my system dual or multiboot. I decided to loadding os NT > loader from Windows XP. > > I have read this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOAD >E R > [...] > > If it is k

radeon drm does not attach

Hi all, I have a problem with drm dri radeon and similar stuff for long time, and every time it begins with (not)detection radeon X600. In FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and PC-BSD 1.2(6.1-RELEASE-p2+custom kernel drm and radeon compiled in), if drm and radeon devices are compiled in kernel, the card is n

adding other login class to login.conf in case one is already there

Hi all, could somebody looks at this PR ? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=103794 It began with my mail to LI Xin. He agreed that I attach our mail´s correspondence. Here it is: > -Original Message- > From: LI Xin [

NT loader still boot first FreeBSD slice, it could not boot second or another slice

Hi all, I wanted to make my system dual or multiboot. I decided to loadding os NT loader from Windows XP. I have read this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADE R My situation: 1. partion ... wxp /dev/ad4s1 2. partion ... ntfs data partition /dev/ad

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

> On many of our servers, we have bge cards and I can see a lot of > watchdog timeouts. We always disable USB in the bios and they didn't > share irq. I see the same thing - we have a number of HP blades which use bge interfaces and I get many watchdog timeouts on them. These are also not sharin

Re: ath based card

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, at 18:30:52 +0200, Zoran Kolic wrote: > Hi all! > I would like to hear opinion of pc card > choice for laptop and atheros chip: > netgear wag511 > d-link dwl-ag650 > linksys wpc55ag > Good and bad. Prior to make idiot of me > and buy wrong. > > Zoran Hi. I

Re: Poor write performance with LSI 320-2 on 6.1-STABLE

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:15:05PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > I don't understand how #1 gives 16MB/s (RAID 1) while #3 gives only > 17MB/s. I'd expect #3 to be about x2 the performance of #1. > > The arrays are configured with "write-thru" write policy, "adaptive" > read policy, and "cachedio" ca

Poor write performance with LSI 320-2 on 6.1-STABLE

I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay (though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some bonnie++ tests on a RAID 1 array between two U320 drives for the first channel and on a R

HEADS UP: Last call for snd_hda(4) testers - High Definition Audio driver

[ Please remove current@ and stable@ from your CC: . This mail serves only as an announcement (or a death threat, if you prefer that way). ] Allright folks, I've had enough. It is time to go gold. This driver is proven stable and works (mostly) after several weeks of testing and bug hunting, tha

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

Mike Jakubik wrote: Scott Long wrote: All, Attached is my first cut at addressing the problems described in this thread. As I discussed earlier, the VM syncer thread is likely starving the USB interrupt thread. This causes the shared usb+network interrupt to remain masked, preventing networ

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

Hi! On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:47:09PM -0500, Alan Amesbury wrote: > Additional data point: On 6.1-RELEASE I've observed the same sort of > behavior, but without any noticeable consistency. It affects bge(4) and > em(4) systems. In the case of the bge(4)-equipped system, there's a > very weak c

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

Scott Long wrote: All, Attached is my first cut at addressing the problems described in this thread. As I discussed earlier, the VM syncer thread is likely starving the USB interrupt thread. This causes the shared usb+network interrupt to remain masked, preventing network interrupts from bei

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

Mike Tancsa wrote: At 03:15 PM 9/28/2006, O. Hartmann wrote: /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c:282: error: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c: At top level: /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c:863: warning: 'usb_intr_task' defined but not used *** Error code 1 Are you sure the p

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

Additional data point: On 6.1-RELEASE I've observed the same sort of behavior, but without any noticeable consistency. It affects bge(4) and em(4) systems. In the case of the bge(4)-equipped system, there's a very weak correlation between heavy disk activity and watchdog timeouts. However, on t

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

At 03:15 PM 9/28/2006, O. Hartmann wrote: /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c:282: error: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c: At top level: /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c:863: warning: 'usb_intr_task' defined but not used *** Error code 1 Are you sure the patch applied cleanly to

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

O. Hartmann wrote: Scott Long wrote: All, Attached is my first cut at addressing the problems described in this thread. As I discussed earlier, the VM syncer thread is likely starving the USB interrupt thread. This causes the shared usb+network interrupt to remain masked, preventing networ

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

Scott Long wrote: All, Attached is my first cut at addressing the problems described in this thread. As I discussed earlier, the VM syncer thread is likely starving the USB interrupt thread. This causes the shared usb+network interrupt to remain masked, preventing network interrupts from bei

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

On Wednesday, 27 September 2006 at 9:40:52 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 06:32:59PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:59:04PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > > I don't think it has to especially with ichsmb here, but only with the > > >

Re: Showstopper - 6.2-PRERELEASE does not see SATA DVD drives (fwd)

Joel Dahl wrote: The Hardware Notes do not mention SATA at all except for RAID controllers. Just FYI, We've been looking at integrating the supported hardware info from the ata(4) manual page into the hardware notes. This *should* at least kill some of the confusion that always surrounds

Re: Intel se7230NH1-E, 6gb memory not working on FreeBSD 6.0

On Wednesday 27 September 2006 16:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I am having a very hard time getting an Intel se7230NH1-E motherboard with > 6gb of memory to work. I keep getting two messages about "Too many holes > in the physical address space, giving up". > > I'm not sure what the

Re: File systems clean after crash?

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:20:29 +0200 Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think so, but it's a good idea :) Oh yes. I have an ext2fs slice here, rarely mount it read-write (almost always read-only), and when power goes off it is fsck'd in the next boot. I should be less lazy and go loo

ath based card

Hi all! I would like to hear opinion of pc card choice for laptop and atheros chip: netgear wag511 d-link dwl-ag650 linksys wpc55ag Good and bad. Prior to make idiot of me and buy wrong. Zoran ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li

Re: 802.11 RSSI value displayed from ifconfig(8)

Looks like you're not running HEAD or RELENG_6 or your system is not update recently. Sam You are right, it is a 5.5-STABLE box. I will make it 6.2-PRERELEASE to find out what is new :-) Thank you. -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 802.11 RSSI value displayed from ifconfig(8)

Eduardo Meyer wrote: > Thank you Mr Leffler for this explanation. Honestly I did not know > about those tools. Very interesting, useful and some curious (say, > number of associations denied by wlan acl) information, which I > believe I will be able to produce some logs of it with audit support. >

Re: 802.11 RSSI value displayed from ifconfig(8)

On Thursday 28 September 2006 17:08, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > Thank you Mr Leffler for this explanation. Honestly I did not know > about those tools. Very interesting, useful and some curious (say, > number of associations denied by wlan acl) information, which I > believe I will be able to produce s

Re: 6-Stable High Interrupt Rate on network

On 9/28/06, Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:57:22 -0300 "Alexandre Biancalana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > >Today I changed the main gateway from our network from PIII 733, 512 MB > Ram running FreeBSD 4-STABLE to a Xeon 3.0, 1Gb Ram running FreeB

Re: 6-Stable High Interrupt Rate on network

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:57:22 -0300 "Alexandre Biancalana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > >Today I changed the main gateway from our network from PIII 733, 512 MB > Ram running FreeBSD 4-STABLE to a Xeon 3.0, 1Gb Ram running FreeBSD > 6-STABLE. But the performance of the network is wo

Re: 802.11 RSSI value displayed from ifconfig(8)

Thank you Mr Leffler for this explanation. Honestly I did not know about those tools. Very interesting, useful and some curious (say, number of associations denied by wlan acl) information, which I believe I will be able to produce some logs of it with audit support. But I did not find any "signa

6-Stable High Interrupt Rate on network

Hi list, Today I changed the main gateway from our network from PIII 733, 512 MB Ram running FreeBSD 4-STABLE to a Xeon 3.0, 1Gb Ram running FreeBSD 6-STABLE. But the performance of the network is worst than before. The new machine is a Dell PowerEdge 1800 have one quad DLink DFE-580TX, one q

Re: snd_emu10k1 driver

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:42:03 -0700, Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 27 September 2006 11:55, Bill Blue wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is this driver known to be 100% working? I'm running stable 6.2 p6 >> right now and have this device driver installed (device sound and >> device snd_e

CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

All, Attached is my first cut at addressing the problems described in this thread. As I discussed earlier, the VM syncer thread is likely starving the USB interrupt thread. This causes the shared usb+network interrupt to remain masked, preventing network interrupts from being delivered, and

Re: File systems clean after crash?

Oliver Fromme wrote: Now I wonder why three of the file systems were reported as being clean. It's my understanding that file systems are only marked clean when they're unmounted. Did that change recently? The system was idle at the time of the crash, and soft-updates was enabled, so it's pos

Re: Once more oddity on -STABLE - Linux emulation is broken someway

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:07:57 +0400 Andrew Kolchoogin wrote: > Linux emulation on -STABLE from September, 25 works somewhat > strange. > Shortly: it dumps core. > Explain: I want to bootstrap native Java Development Kit v1.4 > using Linux JDK. Immediately > after invoking 'java' execut

Re: Fwd: Re: grep command not working as expected

Stephen Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A simple grep command, 'grep -vf patternfile inputfile' works on Linux, > but the same command doesn't work on FreeBSD-6.1. Can you provide an example, please? "grep -fv" seems to work fine for me on FreeBSD 6.1. > To make it work I found I had to u

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

To add another twist to this: I added options POLLING to the kernel, moved the fireware and USB drivers from the kernel and loaded them as modules. I have NOT enabled polling on the em-interface but this new kernal, built on the same sources as the failing one works without a hitch. As before,

Re: 6.2-PRERELEASE/amd64 boot kernel.gz failes

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:33:10AM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I can confirm this: RELENG_6 doesn't pxeboot when /boot/kernel/kernel > is gzipped. In my case, it hangs just after loading a loader.conf file. > I've also verified that loading gzipped kernels/modules works on > 7-CURRENT/i386. So

Re: Showstopper - 6.2-PRERELEASE does not see SATA DVD drives (fwd)

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 17:31 -0400, Frank wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > Frank wrote: > >> I am sending this again since it has been 4 days with no response. > >> > >> I consider this a showstopper since I could boot from CD but sysinstall > >> could not see the DVD drive