On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:36:33PM +0800, Huang wen hui wrote:
> hi,
> I have HP Server install FreeBSD 6.1R/amd64 with 2CPUs ,2 logical CPUs
> per core.
> On top show, It should show 4 cpus, but I never see 1 and 3 cpu on show.
> Does anything I miss?
You must switch off hiper threading in bios a
In the midst of bugs and issues, to which I can empathize and relate, I
wish to offer thanks for all your hard work.
My history: In late 03 my one computer died hot death. I built a new one
after a quick parts dash. With new parts, Windows would still eventually
die. Drivers were unstable. Not fun
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:02:37AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:17:15PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > >Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:07:20 +0200 (CEST)
kama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> >
> > That's true, and the schedule will most probably change.
> > Currently the release is listed for Oct. 9th, but I bet
> > that it'll be delayed.
>
> I disagree, I wou
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:57:25PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:07:35AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote:
> > Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any
> > > negative consequences? (I can't imagine how:: but better
> >
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:07:35AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any
> > negative consequences? (I can't imagine how:: but better
> > informed than to have something crash inexplicability.)
> > W
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:55:48 -0500
>> Greg Barniskis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> If you /track/ STABLE by frequently cvsupping it and rebuilding your
>>> system, you will very likely encounter a serious problem soo
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:37:53AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:55:48 -0500
> >Greg Barniskis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>If you /track/ STABLE by frequently cvsupping it and rebuilding your
> >>system, you will
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:25:35PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> > A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any
> > negative consequences?
>
> Yes, it certainly can have negative consequences. The primary intent
> of using th
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:55:48 -0500
Greg Barniskis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you /track/ STABLE by frequently cvsupping it and rebuilding your
system, you will very likely encounter a serious problem sooner or
later. That's why tracking it is n
hi,
I have HP Server install FreeBSD 6.1R/amd64 with 2CPUs ,2 logical CPUs
per core.
On top show, It should show 4 cpus, but I never see 1 and 3 cpu on show.
Does anything I miss?
--hwh
# dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 19
On 9/13/06, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Them manual page em(4) mentions trying another cable when the watchdog
timeout happens, so I tried that. But it didn't help.
Is there anything I can test to (help) debug this?
It happens a lot when my machine is under load. (100% CPU)
Is it
At 10:20 PM 9/13/2006, David Myers wrote:
Sep 5 11:55:12 ronald kernel: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
I got a bazillion of these, and a completely unusable machine, when
I upgraded to 6.1-stable sources as of two days ago. The machine
would simply freeze for minutes at a time. Going
Sep 5 11:55:12 ronald kernel: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
I got a bazillion of these, and a completely unusable machine, when I
upgraded to 6.1-stable sources as of two days ago. The machine would
simply freeze for minutes at a time. Going back to my previous kernel
(dating from
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:53:29 +0100
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I disagree, I would like to have an notice about it. Even though it might
> > not say much. Just a "The code of the stable branch has been freezed due
> > to the upcomming release of X.Y"
>
> It is kind of useful, becau
On Sep 13, 2006, at 21:00, Karl Denninger wrote:
BTW, part of the issue here with the -BETA thing is that there's no
clear
timeline on this available to people. I certainly was not aware
that you were
in a pre-check period to locking down the code to start the process
of burning
the next
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:46:05PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:38:13PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > This is not cool folks.
>
> I'm really sorry for the breakage. I'm trying to treat -STABLE very
> gently, unfortunately this time I made a mistake.
(elid
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:52:05 +0200, Ronald Klop
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I get these errors a lot.
Sep 5 11:55:12 ronald kernel: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
Sep 5 11:55:12 ronald kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN
Sep 5 11:55:14 ronald kernel: em0: link state changed
On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any
negative consequences?
Yes, it certainly can have negative consequences. The primary intent
of using that option is to change a loop from executing the test or
control
Gary Kline wrote:
>
>
> A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any
> negative consequences? (I can't imagine how:: but better
> informed than to have something crash inexplicability.)
> With 6.X safe at -O2 and with -funroll-loops, that should be
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:17:15PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > >Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for
>
> > > > building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:17:15PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for
> > > building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn't recommended to
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 23:53, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Christian Laursen wrote:
> > Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > - todays desktop drives can lie about writing data. SoftUpdates relies
> > > on some assumptions about when the data
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:26:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:46:05PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:38:13PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > > > This is not cool
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:46:05PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:38:13PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > > This is not cool folks.
> >
> > I'm really sorry for the breakage. I'm trying to treat -STABL
Hello,
I`ve some problems with the network performance on my Soekris NET 4801.
(Freebsd 6.1 release-p3)
When I start "netio" on the soekris and do a
"netio localhost", I get about 8.4 MB/sec, and when I start
with "netio 192.168.0.11"(it´s localhost address) I get only ~2.3 MB/sec.
That´s what
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
...
>> How difficult would it be to build a regression test, or suite
>> of tests?
>
> There are already a number of regression tests under /usr/src/tools/
> regression;
Are they part of an (automated) tinderbox syst
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
Well, after this lengthy discussion, I've switched to -RELEASE.
-STABLE just ain't... We all realize that none of us would
put out a buggy release--not even -CURRENT. But let me ask
the next obvious question. How
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...] If so, this would be an advantage over SU, as
it does surely not use the new introduced BIO_FLUSH. [...]
Soft-updates doesn't handle disk write caches at all.
you're totaly right. I was refering to the assumption of SU that the
drive cache will not "lie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:46:05PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:38:13PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > This is not cool folks.
>
> I'm really sorry for the breakage. I'm trying to treat -STABLE very
> gently, unfortunately this time I made a mistake.
>
> The ch
At 01:27 PM 9/13/2006, Robert Watson wrote:
The other common optimization advice that you may already have
received is to check which time counter FreeBSD has selected. Right
now, 6.x/7.x err on the side of accurate over fast. There's been
quite a bit of debate about this approach, and it's
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
I would like to discuss a little bit more about UDP performance. I've made
some tests and the results may have some value here.
In this test is easy to see that there is something different in th
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
I would like to discuss a little bit more about UDP performance. I've made
some tests and the results may have some value here.
In this test is easy to see that there is something different in the FreeBSD
6 branch.
I made a benchmark wi
Teufel wrote:
> so when the crash occur exactly when BIO_FLUSH is sent or while the
> cache is flushing, there is still no corruption possbile?
A small additional note ... If there's a _hardware_ crash
(e.g. power outage) which causes a track write of the HDD
to be interrupted, you will get co
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:28:49PM +0200, Teufel wrote:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >>>- todays desktop drives can lie about writing data. SoftUpdates relies
> >>>on some assumptions about when the data is physically written to
> >>>media, and those are not always valid today
> >>>
> >>I t
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
- todays desktop drives can lie about writing data. SoftUpdates relies
on some assumptions about when the data is physically written to
media, and those are not always valid today
I think journaling relies on the same assumptions.
Not gjournal, because it
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:54:12 +0200
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have installed
> > iwi-firmware-kmod-3.0_1 Intel PRO/Wireless 2200 Firmware Kernel Module
>
> You will need net/iwi-firmware (not net/iwi-firmware-kmod) for
> 6.1-RELEASE.
>
> Regards,
> Brix
Hi Brix, yes,
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:38:13PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> This is not cool folks.
I'm really sorry for the breakage. I'm trying to treat -STABLE very
gently, unfortunately this time I made a mistake.
The change was committed to HEAD at 9 August. The change fixed one bug,
but introduced an
Hi Pieter,
> My conclusion: there's definately something wrong with your setup. Maybe you
> could try a different NIC to see if the performance issues are driver
> related.
I made a new test with another hardware because HP Blade Proliant
doesn't allow me to put an additional NIC - there isn't
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Christian Laursen wrote:
> Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - todays desktop drives can lie about writing data. SoftUpdates relies
> > on some assumptions about when the data is physically written to
> > media, and those are not always valid to
On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:23 PM, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote:
-STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a
stable and working operating system.
Hahahahaha... That's ironic...
No, just misinterpretation of which attribute of the system to which
the word "stable" applies.
IBM, HP, Compaq, Dell, Toshiba, Cisco, 3Com, Epson, Samsung, Sony
and Ma= ny More
Laptops, Desktops, Servers, Printers, Networking and Po= int of
Sale & More
Dealers
Resellers
Brokers
IBM, HP, Compaq, Dell, Toshiba, Cisco, 3Com, Epson, Samsung, Sony
and Ma= ny More
Laptops, Desktops, Servers, Printers, Networking and Po= int of
Sale & More
Dealers
Resellers
Brokers
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Jonathan Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I set up a new server recently and transferred all the information from
> > my old server over. I tried to use unison to synchronize the backup of
> > pictures I have taken and noticed that a large number of pictures where
>
> I disagree, I would like to have an notice about it. Even though it might
> not say much. Just a "The code of the stable branch has been freezed due
> to the upcomming release of X.Y"
It is kind of useful, because it's the code freeze point at which I start
re-scheduling my work day so I can do
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Andras Gót wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > kama wrote:
> > > > Why isnt there any notice about it on the webpage
> > > > or on this mailing list?
> > >
> > > It's on the webpage (under "Release Engineering"):
> > >
> > > http://www.freebs
Pete Slagle wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for
> > > building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn't recommended to go
> > > above -O2, for instance, but suspect that has changed ... ?
Andras Gót wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > kama wrote:
> > > Why isnt there any notice about it on the webpage
> > > or on this mailing list?
> >
> > It's on the webpage (under "Release Engineering"):
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/releng/
> >
> > I don't think there's need to announ
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:26:00AM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > The default CFLAGS are "-O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing".
> > > Anything above -O2 isn't supported, and using -O2 without
> > > -fno-strict-aliasing also isn't supported (and wil
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:08:23AM -0700, Pete Slagle wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for
> > > building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn't recommended to go
> >
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for
> > building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn't recommended to go
> > above -O2, for instance, but suspect that has changed ... ?
>
> The be
Oliver Fromme wrote:
kama wrote:
> I just updated the sources on two of my machines and found:
>
> $ uname -sr
> FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE
>
> Is this a mistake or is it actually a prerelease?
It's not a mistake. RELENG_6 has been frozen on Sep. 10th
in preparation of the upcoming 6.2-RE
Hi all,
I have a legacy system --- 4xXeon (PIII, 700MHz, 2MB cache), 16GB ECC
RAM and 300GB Harddisk on an ICP Vortex Raid Controller --- which I
tried to bring from RedHat6 to something more current and supported.
(Un)Fortunately the only system that wanted to install on the machine is
FreeB
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > The default CFLAGS are "-O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing".
> > Anything above -O2 isn't supported, and using -O2 without
> > -fno-strict-aliasing also isn't supported (and will create
> > broken code for some programs). A common mistake is to
>
kama wrote:
> I just updated the sources on two of my machines and found:
>
> $ uname -sr
> FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE
>
> Is this a mistake or is it actually a prerelease?
It's not a mistake. RELENG_6 has been frozen on Sep. 10th
in preparation of the upcoming 6.2-RELEASE, so it's now in
"pr
Hello,
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for
> building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn't recommended to go
> above -O2, for instance, but suspect that has changed ... ?
The best
Jonathan Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I set up a new server recently and transferred all the information from
> my old server over. I tried to use unison to synchronize the backup of
> pictures I have taken and noticed that a large number of pictures where
> marked as changed on the se
Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for
> building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn't recommended to go
> above -O2, for instance, but suspect that has changed ... ?
The best optimization is probably to not
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:02:42 -0400
From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc: kama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 6.2?
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 07:12, kama wrote:
>
> I just updated the sources on two of my machines
Eric wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Vince wrote:
> > > Eric wrote:
> > > > S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> > > > > Now i am using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. Now want to upgrade to FreeBSD
> > > > > 6.1-Stable. What is the easy process ?
> > > >
> > > > this works well
> > > >
> > > > http:/
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:40:27AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD ayiin.xxx.com 6.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 #23:
> Tue Sep 12 14:52:32 EST 2006
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AYIIN i386
>
> The only thing I've noticed that in how my lappy works now is th
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:20:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:52:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi list
> >>
> >>I'm upgrading 5.4 p18 to 6.1 p6.
> >>
> >>here's my tag: RELENG_6_1
> >>
> >>I did:
> >>make update
> >>m
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:52:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list
I'm upgrading 5.4 p18 to 6.1 p6.
here's my tag: RELENG_6_1
I did:
make update
make cleanworld
make buildworld
which gives following issue:
cap_mkdb: illegal option -i
It seems a known probl
63 matches
Mail list logo
