Hi,
Thanks a lot for your patch. Your patch fixes panic, however I still see
bge0: firmware handshake timed out
bge0: link state changed to DOWN
messages.
When I tried to use Oleg's if_bge.c, rev. 1.140 in STABLE buildkernel stops:
mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I-
-DH
Hi,
I've got panic on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE when I enabled following kernel
options:
options WITNESS
options WITNESS_KDB
options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
options DEBUG_LOCKS
options DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS
FreeB
An alternative would be to update to RELENG_6 (or at least RELENG_6_1)
and then try again.
So. I have done this. And I can't reproduce the problem.
# uname -a
FreeBSD venus.araneidae.co.uk 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #1: Mon Aug 28
18:32:17 UTC 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/
I'm still seeing an ongoing problem with the bce device on my Dell 1950.
I'm running AMD64 6-STABLE, with the stock SMP kernel, and I'm running
the most recent version of the bce driver, which did cure the other
errors we were seeing (the mbuf related ones).
The card is currently connected at a
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:55:42AM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First sorry if this is not the right place to post my questions :)
>
> I'm trying to run linux-oracle-instantclient-sqlplus-10.2.0.2.20060331
> (ports/databases/linux-oracle-instantclient-sqlplus)
> on FreeBSD 6.1-STABL
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
it's all is very good, but what can you say about to fix problem with
rpc.lockd ???
Well, I will repeat the test with RELENG_6 (as of yesterday lunchtime),
probably tonight, and report back. Unfortunately building takes around 8
hours on my test m
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> it's all is very good, but what can you say about to fix problem with
> rpc.lockd ???
It has been mentioned several times in this mailing list:
rpc.lockd is in need of a complete rewrite. Someone will
have to write a new rpc.lockd implementation. As far as
I know, the
it's all is very good, but what can you say about to fix problem with
rpc.lockd ???
2006/8/29, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 2006-Aug-28 13:23:30 +, Michael Abbott wrote:
>I think there is a case to be made for special casing SIGKILL, but in a
>sense it's not so much the fate of
Hi,
Jiawei Ye wrote:
On 8/29/06, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.2.0.2.20060331/client/lib
/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.2.0.2.20060331/client/bin/sqlplus /nolog
I am running it off a -current system with the follow
On 8/29/06, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.2.0.2.20060331/client/lib
/compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.2.0.2.20060331/client/bin/sqlplus /nolog
I am running it off a -current system with the following command:
LD_LIBRARY_P
Hi all,
First sorry if this is not the right place to post my questions :)
I'm trying to run linux-oracle-instantclient-sqlplus-10.2.0.2.20060331
(ports/databases/linux-oracle-instantclient-sqlplus)
on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE (i386 or/and amd64), but with no success for now.
After installation I run
On Mon, 2006-Aug-28 13:23:30 +, Michael Abbott wrote:
>I think there is a case to be made for special casing SIGKILL, but in a
>sense it's not so much the fate of the process receiving the SIGKILL that
>counts: after all, having sent -9 I know that it will never process again.
Currently, if
12 matches
Mail list logo
