Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Danny Braniss
> Michel Talon wrote: > > >>Using Ubuntu as the server I connected a FreeBSD 5.4 and 6-stable box as > >>clients on a 100Mb/s network. The time trial used a dummy 100Meg file > >>transfered from the server to the client. > >> > > > > > > I have similar experiences here. With FreeBSD-6.1 as c

Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Scott Long
Michel Talon wrote: BTW, I noticed yesterday that that IPv6 support committ to rpc.lockd was never backed out. An immediate question for people experiencing new rpc.lockd problems with 6.x should be whether or not backing out that change helps. So it may be relevant to say that i have kerne

Re: if_bridge.c question

2006-07-04 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:04:16AM -0400, Raymond Owens wrote: > I am running 6.1 release on some systems. I have a question about the > bridging changes in if_bridge.c which were made in the stable branch. > I am having a problem bonding two heavily loaded network interfaces > for IDS purposes. Th

Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Michel Talon
> BTW, I noticed yesterday that that IPv6 support committ to rpc.lockd was > never > backed out. An immediate question for people experiencing new rpc.lockd > problems with 6.x should be whether or not backing out that change helps. So it may be relevant to say that i have kernels without IPV6

Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Scott Long wrote: For what it's worth, I recently spent a lot of time putting FreeBSD 6.1 to the test as both an NFS client and server in a mixed OS environment. By far and away, the biggest problems that I encountered with it were due to linux NFS bugs. CentOS, FC, and S

Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Scott Long
Michel Talon wrote: Using Ubuntu as the server I connected a FreeBSD 5.4 and 6-stable box as clients on a 100Mb/s network. The time trial used a dummy 100Meg file transfered from the server to the client. I have similar experiences here. With FreeBSD-6.1 as client (using an Intel etherexp

if_bridge.c question

2006-07-04 Thread Raymond Owens
I am running 6.1 release on some systems. I have a question about the bridging changes in if_bridge.c which were made in the stable branch. I am having a problem bonding two heavily loaded network interfaces for IDS purposes. There is greatly increased packets droppage when using 'ifconfig br

Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:40:01PM -0700, Michael Collette wrote: > User Freebsd wrote: > >On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > > >>John Hay writes: > >> > >>>I only started to see the lockd problems when upgrading the server side > >>>to FreeBSD 6.x and later. I had various FreeBSD clien

Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Michael Collette wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80389 If you locally back out the referenced change lock_proc.c:1.18 in rpc.lockd on the server, do things improve? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge _

Misleading "fdisk: Geom not found" in 6.1-RELEASE

2006-07-04 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I've noticed that using fdisk against ad2 drive gives misleading diagnostics at the end of execution (there are no mounted partitions at the drive, OS boot device is ad0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -r 6.1-RELEASE [EMAIL PROTECTED] mount|grep ad2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fdisk -a ad2 *** Work

Re: NFS Locking Issue

2006-07-04 Thread Michel Talon
> Using Ubuntu as the server I connected a FreeBSD 5.4 and 6-stable box as > clients on a 100Mb/s network. The time trial used a dummy 100Meg file > transfered from the server to the client. > I have similar experiences here. With FreeBSD-6.1 as client (using an Intel etherexpress card at 100