Hello
I am running -STABLE (checked out Tue Jun 27), and have come across a
strange issue regarding my mouse.
The mouse is a Logitech MX500 connected via USB. My kernel is custom
(GENERIC, just minus the unneeded CPU lines).
An important thing to note is that I do not have a floppy drive insta
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:16:11PM + I heard the voice of
Eprha Carvajal, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I see no ACPI capability in the processor features
ACPI is not a CPU feature.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.n
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
What is this? What i can do for resolve this problem?
I've created core file and backtrace, he has pointed me to
nvidia-driver. The problem was resolved after upgrade
x11/nvidia-driver.
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
___
freebsd-s
Posted on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:06:51 +0100
by author Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Whats the motherboard and chipset ? The problem only seems to
> happen on those 8111 / 8131 based boards - if it's one of those
> and it runs then I'd be extremely interested!
Just FYI. I manage a 4 cores SMP serv
Mihir Sanghavi wrote:
Hi,
I am a new member to FreeBSD on the whole. I would like to know the
differences between FreeBSD 4.7, 5.X and 6.1. My company is using BSD
4.7 currently and I would like it to change to 5 or 6. What technical
difficulties might I face or how much code would be needed to
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:22:07PM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> I have an i386 system currently running 5.2.1-RELEASE with a vinum
> mirror array (2 drives comprising /usr ). I want to upgrade this to
> 5.5-RELEASE which, if I understand correctly, no longer supports vinum
> arrays. Would simp
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 02:06, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : So hideous you are blinded and hence can't reply?
>
> Basically yes.
>
> However, I did reply.
Hmm strange I didn't get it :(
(Unless you meant this message)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:06:38AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> My machine (running RELENG_6) has 2 ATAPI drives attached to the second
> channel of Intel ICH4 built-in ATA controller ata1 (NEC DVD-RW as a master
> and AOPEN CD-RW as a slave). Of course their ATAPI devices a
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 14:38, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 07:27:50PM +0300, Ivan Asmer wrote:
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I'm interesting how to run my canon pixma iP 1500 under my honest
> > freebsd. As I found in internet this is impossible. Who can say
> > more?
Here is how so
Hello!
My machine (running RELENG_6) has 2 ATAPI drives attached to the second
channel of Intel ICH4 built-in ATA controller ata1 (NEC DVD-RW as a master
and AOPEN CD-RW as a slave). Of course their ATAPI devices always show up
in the fixed order:
acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33
acd1: CDRW
Hi.
I have recently updated my system to RELENG_6. Also i've updated more programms
from ports.
> pkg_info -x xorg | grep Info
Information for xorg-6.9.0:
Information for xorg-clients-6.9.0_2:
Information for xorg-documents-6.9.0:
Information for xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.9.0_1:
Information for xorg-f
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:26:23AM -0700, Mihir Sanghavi wrote:
> My company is using BSD 4.7 currently and I would like it to change
> to 5 or 6. What technical difficulties might I face or how much code
> would be needed to re-written.
Please see the article "Choosing the FreeBSD Version That Is
there was some problems with NFS on FreeBSD 6 ...
try to google problem related to NFS or search this mailing list
2006/6/27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, I was wondering if anyone else had encountered this issue and/or come
up with what needs to be done to resolve it:
I curren
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 07:27:50PM +0300, Ivan Asmer wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I'm interesting how to run my canon pixma iP 1500 under my honest freebsd.
> As I found in internet this is impossible. Who can say more?
If it's not listed at the following link, you're probably out of luck:
http:
Hi,
I am a new member to FreeBSD on the whole. I would like to know the
differences between FreeBSD 4.7, 5.X and 6.1. My company is using BSD
4.7 currently and I would like it to change to 5 or 6. What technical
difficulties might I face or how much code would be needed to
re-written. I do underst
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Friday 23 June 2006 15:39, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
: > How's this diff?
:
: So hideous you are blinded and hence can't reply?
Basically yes.
However, I did reply.
Warner
__
Hi, I was wondering if anyone else had encountered this issue and/or come
up with what needs to be done to resolve it:
I currently have MySQL 5.0.22 built from ports on a FreeBSD 6.1 machine
with the DB data residing on a NetApp share connected via NFS. A
strange thing happens often after a fe
There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports
a while ago, I couldn't find the message again, but I
believe it was posted here.
Last week I installed:
FreeBSD tor.fabiankeil.de 6.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jun 23 20:06:57 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BI
Hello everyone.
I'm interesting how to run my canon pixma iP 1500 under my honest freebsd.
As I found in internet this is impossible. Who can say more?
--
wbr, asmer
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
6.1-STABLE crashed on me. I'm providing a backtrace. Could any of you,
experienced people, suggest me if it's a hardware problem or is it an
error inside the OS?
[...]
More info follows:
#7 0xc058e01a in ip_ctloutput
Thank you.
I switch to windows. In control panel->PRISM Setting, It says NIC Firmware
1.07.02.00.
I downloaded the firmware(I can't find any firmware which is rev1.4.X) from
the IBM website, after it reboot my computer, nothing happen. I think it's
because my dual booting system. sigh...
On 6/27/
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
>> 6.1-STABLE crashed on me. I'm providing a backtrace. Could any of you,
>> experienced people, suggest me if it's a hardware problem or is it an
>> error inside the OS?
> This is a known bug in the TCP code; a large set of outstanding changes is
> pre
Based on postings I've found in Google, the Warnings below are just that,
and shouldn't affect the operation of the server ... in fact, my other
Dual-PIII is running fine, so I'm currently running under the assumption
that one of the CPUs has just finally given up the ghost, and that it
isn't
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Morten A. Middelthon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0200, Morten A. Middelthon wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2 on a Dell PowerEdge 1850 with an attached
> > Dell PowerVault 220S disk cabinet. The cabinet has two
I see no ACPI capability in the processor features
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
also seems to be failing right after loading the acpi module
===>acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler: can't alloc wake memory
perphaps your bios is broker.
From: Jorn
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Today i noticed this in the log of one of my systems. Does any one
know what this means? The system has been up for over a month with no
problems.
---
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
6.1-STABLE crashed on me. I'm providing a backtrace. Could any of you,
experienced people, suggest me if it's a hardware problem or is it an error
inside the OS?
This is a known bug in the TCP code; a large set of outstanding changes is
present in
On Friday 23 June 2006 15:39, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> How's this diff?
So hideous you are blinded and hence can't reply?
:)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choos
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0200, Morten A. Middelthon wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2 on a Dell PowerEdge 1850 with an attached
> Dell PowerVault 220S disk cabinet. The cabinet has two RAID5 arrays each with
> 6 x 300GB SCSI disks. The RAID controller is a Dell PE
Hi list,
I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2 on a Dell PowerEdge 1850 with an attached
Dell PowerVault 220S disk cabinet. The cabinet has two RAID5 arrays each with
6 x 300GB SCSI disks. The RAID controller is a Dell PERC4/DC using the amr
driver. Two days ago a disk failed in one of the arrays. Re
Just wanted to say thank you for clearing up my confusion about ECC.
And also, I want to excuse for being a bit harsh in some posts.
(I am a rather cynic person, this helps me against not going crazy over
all this stuff.)
Last night, after hours of working on the very same problem without any
s
Hi
I have 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD and when I try compiling maildrop with
/usr/ports/mail/maildrop
I get errors:
/bin/sh /usr/ports/mail/maildrop/work/maildrop-2.0.2/install-sh -c -s
rfc2045/makemime /usr/local/bin/makemime
. maildrop/uidgid ; test -z "$gid" && exit 0; test -w /etc || exit 0; cd
On Tue, 2006-Jun-27 00:01:08 +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
>>I think this is a useful activity, especially if you've already run
>>extensive memory testing on the box. If you haven't yet done that, I
>>encourage you to take a break from buildworld'
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:54 PM, M.Hirsch wrote:
Ok, sorry. Misunderstanding here.
My point was, along what has been posted here in this thread:
"An ECC error should raise a kernel panic immediately, not only a
message in the log files."
Preferably not until the running transactions are process
Looking at the sources:
The 'blocked' column in vmstat is the sum of
(struct vmtotal).t_dw /* jobs in ``disk wait'' (neg priority) */ and
(struct vmtotal).t_pw /* jobs in page wait */
'systat -v' splits these into two fields (Proc:d and Proc:p) as does
sysctl vm.vmtotal
It's difficult to map t
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Paul Allen wrote:
The very originating purpose of ECC was to keep the computer going in the
face of an alpha particle strike.
Alpha particles flip *single* bits.
ECC was never intended to detect crummy, failing hardware: that's a use
people have shoe-horned it into, but for
36 matches
Mail list logo
