Thanks Scott,
But unfortunately, that's not the case...
With ps ax I found a process
1 ?? ILs0:00.00 /sbin/init --
Strange stuff, grrr
The server is on a datacenter, I don't see the startup messages...
Olivier
Scott, Brian a écrit :
That would be the old 'accidentally deleted a # from
Sean McNeil writes:
| I get the following:
|
| ===> ipmi (depend)
| make: don't know how to make ipmi.c. Stop
| *** Error code 2
That should be fixed.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
That would be the old 'accidentally deleted a # from a line in rc.conf'
problem. There are likely to be several lines beginning '# -- ' in the file.
New users often accidentally remove the # making the '--' into a command. There
will also be a few messages during startup that will also complain
On Friday 16 June 2006 11:48, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> usb_control_msg: 33 9 791 0 0x514f34 8 4000
> USB error: error sending control message: Input/output error
> Set report failed
> FAILED
ktrace shows..
26140 newhidups RET write 89/0x59
26140 newhidups CALL ioctl(0x4,USB_SET_TIMEOUT,0x7fff
Hi,
I am trying to use an MGE Pulsar Extreme UPS with the NUT port using the
newhidups driver.
I can read the values just fine but I can't set anything which precludes the
PC from shutting the UPS off (or in fact configuring it in any way). The
error is...
...
Looking up DelayBeforeStartup
usb
I had one of these a couple of weeks ago or so; I had been distracted by
some more urgent matters that came up (the panic was on a machine under
test; the more urgent matters were little things like needing to deploy
a handful of resolvers on our network because existing ones were running
on system
On 6/14/2006, "Sam Leffler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Reid Linnemann wrote:
>> Thanks Sam, I've disabled power save mode in both wireless windows
>> clients and I'll see if the problem lightens up. Also, do you know why
>> device timeouts would be spat out by the driver when no stations are
>> a
TB --- 2006-06-15 21:26:43 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-06-15 21:26:43 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2006-06-15 21:26:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-06-15 21:27:19 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-06-15 21:27:19 - cd
TB --- 2006-06-15 19:39:41 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-06-15 19:39:41 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2006-06-15 19:39:41 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-06-15 19:40:26 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-06-15 19:40:26 - c
I get the following:
===> ipmi (depend)
make: don't know how to make ipmi.c. Stop
*** Error code 2
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Doug,
Your recent commit appears to have broken buildkernel on AMD64.
For some reason the COMPAT_LINUX32 option is not honored, so I
get the wrong header files.
/usr/obj/usr/src/make.amd64/make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES |
MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O2 -f
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there any good reason why "gcc -pthread" links in
> > -lpthead except when -shared is specified?
>
> Because one may want to build applications to use different
> threading libraries. Application A may work better with libthr,
> wh
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Mark Andrews wrote:
Is there any good reason why "gcc -pthread" links in
-lpthead except when -shared is specified?
Because one may want to build applications to use different
threading libraries. Application A may work better with libthr,
while applicati
freebsd 5.4
#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2001-2005 Douglas Barton, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# All rights reserved.
#
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
# are met:
# 1. Redis
> Since a few days, I receive this in /var/mail/root
> Any idea?
>
> Olivier
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 15 11:11:00 2006
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from xxx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>by finalcut.be (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5F9B0Pu051577
>for <[EMAIL P
Since a few days, I receive this in /var/mail/root
Any idea?
Olivier
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 15 11:11:00 2006
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xxx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by finalcut.be (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5F9B0Pu051577
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Jun
16 matches
Mail list logo
