Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?]

2006-05-14 Thread Ganbold
Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > Pyun, > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:22:15PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote.. > > > > On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: >

Re: new sk driver [was: nve timeout (and down) regression?]

2006-05-14 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote: > Pyun, > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:22:15PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote.. > > > > On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > > > and sparc64(SMP)

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-14 Thread Stephen Hurd
Howard Leadmon wrote: Would this just be lockd, or should I disable both lockd and statd? I notice in the rc.conf it claims they are both supposed to be enabled, so not sure what issues I run into if I disable them, if any. No need to disable rpc.statd though I don't know if any other program

Re: SE Linux

2006-05-14 Thread Elisey O. Savateev
Mon, 15 May 2006 10:26:33 +0800 "Low Kian Seong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Вы писали: > Dear all, > > I will jump straight to the question. Is there something like SE > Linux in FreeBSD which enforces Mandatory Access Control (MAC) on > processes ? There is a project called "TrustedBSD". File

RE: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-14 Thread Howard Leadmon
Would this just be lockd, or should I disable both lockd and statd? I notice in the rc.conf it claims they are both supposed to be enabled, so not sure what issues I run into if I disable them, if any. As to my servers, I have a bunch of stuff running actually. The Dual XEON server being my fas

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote: > >Hello All, > > I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x > releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small > network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD a

Re: SE Linux

2006-05-14 Thread Eric Schuele
Low Kian Seong wrote: Dear all, I will jump straight to the question. Is there something like SE Linux in FreeBSD which enforces Mandatory Access Control (MAC) on processes ? Try here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mac.html Thank you in advance. _

SE Linux

2006-05-14 Thread Low Kian Seong
Dear all, I will jump straight to the question. Is there something like SE Linux in FreeBSD which enforces Mandatory Access Control (MAC) on processes ? Thank you in advance. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/

Re: bogus dhclient EXPIRE when using wi0

2006-05-14 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:48:16PM -0400, J.R. Oldroyd wrote: > Using 6.1-STABLE cvsup'd on 5/9, I am noticing that on insertion > of a wi0 card, dhclient is invoking its dhclient-script several > times, as follows, from instrumentation added to the script: > > Sun May 14 18:34:20 EDT 2006 dhclien

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-14 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 "m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am writing in regard to PR at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am > experiencing behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: > Sun Mar 26 00:03:52 EST 2006 which looks a lot like someth

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-14 Thread Michel Talon
> Are you running rpc.lockd? I've had very bad luck with it since > sometime in the 5.x series... especially with it interoperating with > Solaris. I submitted a PR on it, but it's apparently broken in about X > ways. If possible, I would suggest living without rpc.lockd for now (if > you're

bogus dhclient EXPIRE when using wi0

2006-05-14 Thread J.R. Oldroyd
Using 6.1-STABLE cvsup'd on 5/9, I am noticing that on insertion of a wi0 card, dhclient is invoking its dhclient-script several times, as follows, from instrumentation added to the script: Sun May 14 18:34:20 EDT 2006 dhclient reason=PREINIT Sun May 14 18:34:20 EDT 2006 dhclient reason=REBOOT Sun

Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-14 Thread Stephen Hurd
Howard Leadmon wrote: Hello All, I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines together. This has all been run

Re: FTPd recommendation?

2006-05-14 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sun, 14 May 2006 11:29:21 +0100 Jase Thew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm curious - do you have any empirical evidence to support this? 'scuse me, boys, could you please take this off the freebsd-stable list? The discussion has wandered off-topic for this list... -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfse

Re: Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE

2006-05-14 Thread Matti J. Karki
On 5/14/06, Matti J. Karki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0300, Matti J. Karki wrote: > > On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hello, > > > > > >When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file fr

Re: INVARIANTS (was Re: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression)

2006-05-14 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of > Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert > > code paths. > > It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of bzero()/NULL'ing out of > mem

Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-14 Thread Howard Leadmon
Hello All, I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines together. This has all been running fine up till a few

Re: FTPd recommendation?

2006-05-14 Thread Jase Thew
Chris H. wrote: Quoting Iantcho Vassilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: My vote goes to PureFtpd.. It`s ideal server.. But is not *nearly* as secure as vsftpd. Hi, I'm curious - do you have any empirical evidence to support this? A trawl of a few vulnerabilty databases would suggest your comment is

Re: Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE

2006-05-14 Thread Matti J. Karki
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0300, Matti J. Karki wrote: > On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hello, > > > >When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the > >copy is not equal to te sour

vr card issues on 6.1-STABLE

2006-05-14 Thread Gray Lilley
Hi List, After a motherboard failure in a machine, I purchased a cheap AXPER motherboard to replace it. The machine is a Socket478 P4 with a Via Rhine onboard NIC. I've read/heard a lot to say "don't use vr cards, they suck" kind of talk - but wanted to go through the official channels to

Re: FTPd recommendation?

2006-05-14 Thread Chris H.
Quoting Iantcho Vassilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: My vote goes to PureFtpd.. It`s ideal server.. But is not *nearly* as secure as vsftpd. On 5/4/06, N.J. Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-04 05:48:40 -0800]: > What are people using for their ftpd these d

Re: ATA DMA corruption on 5.5-beta4

2006-05-14 Thread Martin
Phil Kernick wrote: Looking through the stable archives this was reported last year but there does not seem to be any resolution of the problem. Yea. I had this problem, too. My controller was an old Highpoint ATA 66. Since noone could help, I moved directly to 6.x branch. That solved my issue