Mark Cullen wrote:
I know 4.x is outdated and all that, and soon to be unsupported
(probably very much unsupported already) but I thought I'd post anyway.
I'm not ready to move to 5 / 6.
I just got this panic while copying an old website to a new folder via
samba, deleting it again (didn't qu
Dear all,
I have written some documentation for getting zope working on FreeBSD-stable
and posted it on my blog. Could your please review it for inclusion into
FreeBSD documentation ?
The link is here :
http://www.iosn.net/Members/platypus/blog/74
Any comments are welcomed.
Thank you for your
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hi,
I have FreeBSD AMD64 running on a Pentium D and I would like to know
what should I use for the CPUTYPE variable of make.conf.
I used "nocona" without any problems, but im not 100% sure if this is
correct.
___
freebsd-
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:20:11PM -0400, Matt Smith wrote:
> I have this card install in a System but the GENERIC kernel does not pick it
> up. Is there a custom driver for this card or a step I'm missing.
If this is non-PNP card you have to specify irq and dma explicitely.
-ip
--
A free agen
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:47:29AM -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have FreeBSD AMD64 running on a Pentium D and I would like to know
> what should I use for the CPUTYPE variable of make.conf.
AFAIK, it is not necessary to set CPUTYPE in make.conf. My amd64 box is
running just fine w
Hi,
I have FreeBSD AMD64 running on a Pentium D and I would like to know
what should I use for the CPUTYPE variable of make.conf.
Thanks
Pierre-Luc Drouin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
John-Mark> How about drop iir?
Doug> But your suggestion does have merit, especially as recent PCI-X
Doug> and PCI-E ICP cards have no FreeBSD driver in sight.
Scott> My understanding is that the ICP division is switching over to
Scott> the architcture supported by the 'aac' driver. Adaptec
Scot
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 07:33 -0500, Martin Jackson wrote:
> >> I'm using 6.1-RC built on Apr 18 but that problem was there even on
> >> 6.0-RELEASE
> >
> > Are you using an HTTP proxy? The pre-6.1 series portsnap did not play
> > nicely with HTTP proxies. There were some patches committed in Mar
I'm using 6.1-RC built on Apr 18 but that problem was there even on
6.0-RELEASE
Are you using an HTTP proxy? The pre-6.1 series portsnap did not play
nicely with HTTP proxies. There were some patches committed in March or
so to address PR's on the subject. I haven't had an opportunity to te
Here is what I get:
# portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found.
Fetching snapshot tag... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from Tue Apr 18 03:16:17 AST 2006 to Sat Apr 22 14:30:08 AST
2006.
Fetching 4 metadata patches. done.
Applying metadata patches...
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 10:19 -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> Paul Mather wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 14:40 +0200, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> >> Hm, but I see a quite noticeable speed difference between portsnap1 and
> >> portsnap2. The second one is quite a bit faster.
>
> I'll look into this over
I know 4.x is outdated and all that, and soon to be unsupported
(probably very much unsupported already) but I thought I'd post anyway.
I'm not ready to move to 5 / 6.
I just got this panic while copying an old website to a new folder via
samba, deleting it again (didn't quite work as expected
12 matches
Mail list logo
