David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did once mail des@ to ask him if he'd mind me changing the default
> login timeout for sshd to be (say) 5 minutes rather than 1 minute,
> but I think he was busy at the time. Judging by the PR mentioned
> above it should be at least 2m30s by default. Des
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:27:47PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Well, I have tracked the problem down a bit. It happens when the system
> runs out of memory and starts to use the swap file. The glimpse indexing
> operation is very memory intensive and under V6 it simply crawls when it
> starts pa
I have the similar issue. I have hot-swap disks and when I want to install from
CDs (till 5.x and 6.x) I got lots of garbage hexadecimals. I found a solution
for that. I just remove the disk just before the selecting the MENU item. Then
after a time before installation wants to see SCSI devices
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:55:59AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> Locales are searched for in /usr/share/locales, and there
> is no locale "en_US". The next closest locale would be
> "en_US.US-ASCII". You could make a Symlink to en_US, but
> that's an ugly hack, of course. :-)
>
Thank
For a local server, is there any reason why I would want to keep
net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable on ? I was kind of surprised at the
difference in the results with it on and off
[backup3]# iperf -c 10.1.1.2
Client connecting to 10.1.
I managed to get the screen to pause and discerned an error
message:
ACPI disabled by blacklist
MADT: ACPI Startup failed with AE_ERROR
panic: Using MADT but ACPI doesn't work
Old archived messages offer a solution that requires altering the
loader.conf file, but I don't want to maintain a sys
root 13 0.0 0.0 016 ?? WL8:17PM 0:00.00 [irq1: atkbd0]
root 14 0.0 0.0 016 ?? WL8:17PM 0:00.00 [irq0:]
root 15 0.0 0.0 016 ?? WL8:17PM 0:00.00 [irq3:]
root 16 0.0 0.0 016 ?? WL8:17PM 0:00.00 [irq4:]
root
Greetings,
I am trying to install FreeBSD 6.0 from CD. The boot loader runs
just fine to the point of the boot menu. After this point, no matter
which option I select (boot normally, Safe Mode, single User, etc.), my
screen endlessly cycles a dump of what looks like hexidecimal memo
On Feb 10, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:08:24PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote..
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:24:23PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:45:53PM +0100, Sren Schmidt wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 20
In the last episode (Feb 15), Kris Kennaway said:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 04:34:32PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Feb 15), Kris Kennaway said:
> > > I often see this too. For example:
> > >
> > > PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
> >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 04:34:32PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Feb 15), Kris Kennaway said:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:42:04PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > In the last episode (Feb 15), Ivan Kolosovskiy said:
> > > > top:
> > > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES ST
On Feb 15, 2006, at 5:34 , Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 15), Kris Kennaway said:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:42:04PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
I often see this too. For example:
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU
COMMAND
5357 kkenn 1 96
In the last episode (Feb 15), Kris Kennaway said:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:42:04PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Feb 15), Ivan Kolosovskiy said:
> > > top:
> > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
> > > 38410 findfile1 960 0K
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:15:55 -0700
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Butler wrote:
> > What is the most recent version of VMware known to work on 6.x in
> > host mode so as to be able to run windoze as a guest?
> >
> > Anyone tried 5.5 on 6.x yet? .. or the time-limited beta (expire
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:42:04PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Feb 15), Ivan Kolosovskiy said:
> > i have strange deadlocked(?) process on my system.
> >
> > top:
> >
> > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
> > 38410 findfile1 960
Michael Butler wrote:
What is the most recent version of VMware known to work on 6.x in host
mode so as to be able to run windoze as a guest?
Anyone tried 5.5 on 6.x yet? .. or the time-limited beta (expires ~July)
of VMware server (free! at http://www.vmware.com/products/server)?
Michae
At 16.54 14/02/2006, Miguel Ramos wrote:
>> Check with vmstat -i to see if you have an interrupt storm of
>> some sort.
>>
>>David.
>
>Very good sugestion, thank you, that is obviously it and it didn't cross
>my mind.
>
>It is on irq11 (devices cbb0, cardbus and ohci0++, whatever ++ is).
in a lab of diskless machines, more or less identical
(2003-2004 vintage, pentium 2.6GHz HTT, intel motherboard,
ich5 chipset...), i see 5 out of 11 machine panicing
on a bios16() call in sys/i386/i386/bios.c.
After a bit of investigation i located the problem
in the bios16() call for the 6th PNP d
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:31:49PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> What is the most recent version of VMware known to work on 6.x in host
> mode so as to be able to run windoze as a guest?
If you can't find a suitable VMware, try /usr/ports/emulators/qemu.
Roland
--
R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.
In the last episode (Feb 15), Ivan Kolosovskiy said:
> i have strange deadlocked(?) process on my system.
>
> top:
>
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
> 38410 findfile1 960 0K 0K START 0 0:00 0.00% grotty
>
> ps:
>
> host$ ps -waux |
What is the most recent version of VMware known to work on 6.x in host
mode so as to be able to run windoze as a guest?
Anyone tried 5.5 on 6.x yet? .. or the time-limited beta (expires ~July)
of VMware server (free! at http://www.vmware.com/products/server)?
Michael
smime.p7s
Desc
Hi, all. Sorry for bad english :-)
i have strange deadlocked(?) process on my system.
top:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
38410 findfile1 960 0K 0K START 0 0:00 0.00% grotty
ps:
host$ ps -waux | grep grotty
findfile 38410 0,0 0,0
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 09:31 am, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Craig Boston wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 10:04:16PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I recently made another stab at overhauling wi to better integrate with
> net80211. It uses some of Craig's work and some of mine. The results
> we
Craig Boston wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 10:04:16PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
The problem is that the integration of the modern wlan (802.11) code has
never been done in the if_wi code and it does not report state back to
wlan adequately to make the OpenBSD client function correctly.
Well
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:03:50AM +0100, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> Yes, i know about the read support..from this came my question. But i aggree
> i should ask CURRENT!
You should first search the mailing list archives for the answer to
this question one of the other times it was asked, to avoid a
Has anyone done a recent port of ATA MkIII as found in
7-current/6-stable to 5.x? I checked Søren's web page for the MkIII
patches for 5.x but they haven't been updated since April of '05.
Thanks,
Guy Helmer
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
- Problem is uninterruptible lock? Or other problem exists?
BTW, the kernel->user protocol for rpc.lockd on the client currently cannot
support lock request aborts, so the sleep waiting on locks has to remain
uninterruptible until that is fixed.
R
Hi,
Since I committed rev 1.18 of usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lock_proc.c, I heard
several report about interoperability problems.
Unfortunatelly, I cannot reproduce this problem. Relevant PRs are:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/80389
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/849
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:04:05 +0800
"Balgansuren Batsukh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed FreeBSD-6.0-RELEASE on my laptop and cvsuped to
> FreeBSD-STABLE. It is working pretty much stable.
>
> If possible I would like to migrate existing whole filesystem and
> partitions to G
I have such a question for GBDE/GELI-->
Because the encryption is transparent what would happen to the disk if a
power failure occur
Does the encryption still work?
On 2/15/06, Balgansuren Batsukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Alec,
>
> 17.16.1.1 Preparing the Encrypted Hard Drive
>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:15:13AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > I tried loading a 6.1-BETA1 kernel (the default GENERIC
> > > kernel from the BETA1 distribution) on a system with
> > > the /boot directory (including /boot/
Yes, i know about the read support..from this came my question. But i aggree
i should ask CURRENT!
On 2/15/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Do you guys if a stable xfs support is going to be release?
>
> http://www.freebs
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I tried loading a 6.1-BETA1 kernel (the default GENERIC
> > kernel from the BETA1 distribution) on a system with
> > the /boot directory (including /boot/loader) from a 4.x
> > installation. To be exact, it's 4.9-RELEASE.
>
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
Hi,
Do you guys if a stable xfs support is going to be release?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/
I cannot say anything about 'stable' because I don't have a need
to build/use it.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
34 matches
Mail list logo
