On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:29:50 +0100
Tobias Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is what I described above normal? Does it happen with other drivers
> too? Or did I find a bug? I'll try to check with -current as soon as
I don't know if it is normal. FWIW, I see something like it on a box
with nve0 inte
Too late. Scott beat me to it.
On 2/5/06, Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sigh. Sorry. I'm on it.
>
>
> On 2/5/06, FreeBSD Tinderbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - tinderbox 2.3 running on
> > freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
> > TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - starti
Sigh. Sorry. I'm on it.
On 2/5/06, FreeBSD Tinderbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for
> sparc64/sparc64
> TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - cleaning the object
On Sun, 2006-Feb-05 19:29:50 +0100, Tobias Roth wrote:
>bge0: link state changed to DOWN
And "bge0: link state changed to UP" in the messages file.
>Is what I described above normal?
It seems normal for bge(4).
> Does it happen with other drivers too?
I don't recall seeing it on any other driv
Hello Group
CVSuped a 5.4 release box 2 days ago ( was going for 5-stable )
CVS server gave me 5.5 prerelease
two days later everything is 100 % installed
had to run pkg_deinstall on gnome-2-10
after running portupgrade to install gnome-2.12
run down on PC i worked with
Compaq 5003US PIII 866
Hi
I noticed something that confuses me. During system startup and the
rc.d/ sequence, I get the following message:
bge0: link state changed to DOWN
To diagnose this, I put an 'ifconfig bge0' at the beginning of the
first rc.d script that is executed, and indeed that triggered the
message. Durin
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:36:56AM +, James Seward wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to deploy a FreeBSD6 machine using if_bridge and pf to
provide some protection for our Windows servers ;)
During testing it seemed to work fine, but in production it panics frequently.
Whe
Philippe Pegon wrote:
I'm not sure, but I believe that the Smart Array 532 doesn't have write
cache and doesn't support it :
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantstorage/arraycontrollers/smartarray532/questionsanswers.html#11
Yes, you're right :(
Oh well, I'll have to work ar
Ivan Voras wrote:
Philippe Pegon wrote:
If I remember correctly, you can see it at boot time. I don't know how
to find it when FreeBSD is up. Maybe someone else knows it (if it's
possible) ?
It doesn't mention cache when booting and initialising the array.
I'm not sure, but I believe that
TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2006-02-05 11:55:13 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 11:56:10 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 11:56:10
Philippe Pegon wrote:
If I remember correctly, you can see it at boot time. I don't know how
to find it when FreeBSD is up. Maybe someone else knows it (if it's
possible) ?
It doesn't mention cache when booting and initialising the array.
___
freebs
Ivan Voras wrote:
Philippe Pegon wrote:
do you have write cache on your Smart Array 532 ?
I don't know (not my hardware) - how to find out?
If I remember correctly, you can see it at boot time. I don't know how
to find it when FreeBSD is up. Maybe someone else knows it (if it's
possible)
TB --- 2006-02-05 10:50:49 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-02-05 10:50:49 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2006-02-05 10:50:49 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 10:51:54 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 10:51:54 - cd /
Philippe Pegon wrote:
do you have write cache on your Smart Array 532 ?
I don't know (not my hardware) - how to find out?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
Ivan Voras wrote:
I need to get a Proliant machine with 2 P3 processors running FreeBSD 6.
I don't know much about the machine, I think it's ML 380 G2 or close to
that, but I have physical access. So far, everything is fine (once the
inability to boot from CD-ROM is circumvented), except one "d
TB --- 2006-02-05 09:44:49 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-02-05 09:44:49 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2006-02-05 09:44:49 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 09:45:56 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 09:45:56 - cd /
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Not sure if this is standard, but on an idle machine (ie. just set it
up, nothing running on it yet), with RAID1+0 across 4 drives:
Writing the 853 Megabyte file, 'iozone.tmp'...15.656250 seconds
Reading the file...3.921875 seconds
IOZONE performance measurements:
TB --- 2006-02-05 08:17:57 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-02-05 08:17:57 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2006-02-05 08:17:57 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 08:21:19 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 08:21:19 - cd
TB --- 2006-02-05 07:09:59 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2006-02-05 07:09:59 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2006-02-05 07:09:59 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 07:11:02 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2006-02-05 07:11:02 - cd
19 matches
Mail list logo
