On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Don Lewis wrote:
db> show lockedbufs
[snip]
looks like this is the buf that pid 87150 is waiting for:
buf at 0xdc713f50
b_flags = 0xa00200a0
b_error = 0, b_bufsize = 16384, b_bcount = 16384, b_resid = 0
b_bufobj = (0xc8985610), b_data = 0xe0b7b000, b_blkno = 365094624
lo
On 3 Jan, Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> There are large number of sendmail processes waiting on vnode locks
>> which are held by other sendmail processes that are waiting on other
>> vnode locks, etc. until we get to sendmail pid 87150 which is holding a
>> vnode
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Don Lewis wrote:
There are large number of sendmail processes waiting on vnode locks
which are held by other sendmail processes that are waiting on other
vnode locks, etc. until we get to sendmail pid 87150 which is holding a
vnode lock and waiting to lock a buf.
Tracing com
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:01:36 -0200
JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found out this for releng_6 and appearently is the same on former
> versions since all call the same problem:
Interesting enough, today I stubled over a much easier solution than
those discussed earlier in this thread.
I si
On 3 Jan, Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, I wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>
>>> It may not be the same problem. You should also try to obtain a trace when
>>> snapshots are not implicated.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. I'll do so at the first opportunity.
>>
>
> First,
Patrick Lamaizière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Mardi 27 Décembre 2005 02:48, Julian Stecklina a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> I just discovered that the DRM drivers have been updated and my 855GM
>> is now supported by i915.ko.
>>
>> If I load the module, the driver attaches:
> ...
>> The problem i
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, I wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It may not be the same problem. You should also try to obtain a trace when
snapshots are not implicated.
Agreed. I'll do so at the first opportunity.
First, my thanks to all of you for looking into this.
It's tak
Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Doug Barton wrote:
First, rc.conf and periodic.conf are totally separate, so having just one
knob for both isn't practical now, but might be an interesting project down
the road. Second, IIRC the first implementation of sendmail_enable=no did
actually d
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Doug Barton wrote:
> First, rc.conf and periodic.conf are totally separate, so having just one
> knob for both isn't practical now, but might be an interesting project down
> the road. Second, IIRC the first implementation of sendmail_enable=no did
> actually disable all of sen
Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Dec 31, 2005, at 6:56 PM, security wrote:
And the rc.sendmail(8) under 5.4 stable says that "NONE" is
deprecated and will be removed in a future release. According to
the man page,
It says that in 6.0 also, so it will probably
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2005, at 6:56 PM, security wrote:
>
> > And the rc.sendmail(8) under 5.4 stable says that "NONE" is
> > deprecated and will be removed in a future release. According to
> > the man page,
>
> It says that in 6.0 also, so it will probably be at
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:52:03 -0500
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:45:47PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:55:02 +0100
>
> "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have connections to several systems and a few daemons listening, both
> > INET and INET6. Since my last upgrade, I can't see them with ne
"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have connections to several systems and a few daemons listening, both
> INET and INET6. Since my last upgrade, I can't see them with netstat.
Are you sure your kernel and userland are in synch?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
> Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm afraid that doesn't help me, either, as you can see there's
> no debugging information in there (the "??" question marks
> should be function calls actually).
> Apparently there's a NULL pointer deref somewhere, I'll try
On Dec 31, 2005, at 6:56 PM, security wrote:
And the rc.sendmail(8) under 5.4 stable says that "NONE" is
deprecated and will be removed in a future release. According to
the man page,
It says that in 6.0 also, so it will probably be at least until 7.0
that it continues to work.
Person
> I have connections to several systems and a few daemons listening, both
> INET and INET6. Since my last upgrade, I can't see them with netstat.
>
> Has anyone else seen this?
i have had known listeners not showing in 6 and 7
randy
___
freebsd-stable
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Ludo Koren wrote:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x40
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc07339c9
stack pointer = 0x10:0xe5f9e840
frame pointer = 0x10:0xe5f
18 matches
Mail list logo
