Re: i915drm

On Friday 23 December 2005 08:11, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > At 08.10 22/12/2005, dawnshade wrote: > >On Thursday 22 December 2005 04:22, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > >> It seems to me that also Oliver has the same bug (0M) on his 915GM > >> Any other with with centrino based 915 card

Re: em bad performance

> On 12/22/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > D> > D> > > D> > D> Server listening on

Re: indefinite wait buffer: Does this indicate hardware issue?

Hi, On 19 Dec 2005 14:32:31 -0600, Douglas K. Rand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Tracing command swapper pid 0 tid 0 td 0xc0698e20 > sched_switch(c0698e20,0,1) at sched_switch+0x14b > mi_switch(1,0) at mi_switch+0x1ba > scheduler(0,81ec00,81e000,0,c042f5d5) at scheduler+0x262 > mi_startup() a

Re: i915drm

At 13.00 20/12/2005, dawnshade wrote: >On Tuesday 20 December 2005 11:37, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: >> hp:/home/gmarco> glxgears >> ERROR: line 125, Function intelInitDriver, File intel_screen.c >> libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs. >> libGL error: InitDriver failed >> libGL error:

Re: i915drm

At 08.10 22/12/2005, dawnshade wrote: >On Thursday 22 December 2005 04:22, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: >> It seems to me that also Oliver has the same bug (0M) on his 915GM >> Any other with with centrino based 915 card can confirm this ? > >for me works fine: > >dmesg |grep -E 'drm|agp' >ag

Re: FreeBSD Update is the binary update solution [Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006]

On Thu, 2005-Dec-22 13:17:30 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: >But FreeBSD Update suffers from all of the same limitations that I've been >describing because of lack of integration with the Core OS. > >1. modified kernels are foobar > ..yet are practically mandatory on production systems > >2. modified sour

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

On Thu, 2005-Dec-22 13:10:19 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: >I and many others have offered to work on this. The core team has >repeatedly stated that they won't integrate the efforts, which makes >os-upgrade capability minimal and easily broken. (see current efforts) On Thu, 2005-Dec-22 14:05:32 -0800,

Re: gmirror SCSI+IDE

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:23:48PM -0500 I heard the voice of Martin Cracauer, and lo! it spake thus: > Ivan Voras wrote on Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:39:18PM +0100: > > > For example, AFAIK SCSI devices are under Giant and IDE are not > > In 6.x and 7.x both are finer-graded. I wish somebody wou

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:09:04PM -0800 I heard the voice of Jo Rhett, and lo! it spake thus: > > No, you're missing the point. More core OS upgrades means less > incremental patches (which are easier to apply than a full update). Right. I don't understand how B follows A here. These patches

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006 )

On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:42, Jo Rhett wrote: > > Using a build server as a testbed and to generate new packages or even a > > new kernel + world will reduce the amount of work required, but FreeBSD > > does require some level of administration and maintenance. > > We already have that. But again, I'

Re: FreeBSD Update is the binary update solution [Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006]

On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:47, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:19:25PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > FreeBSD Update was written by, and is continuously maintained by the > > actual FreeBSD Security Officer. It's as official as it gets. If > > the only barrier to acceptance is that it's no

Re: gmirror SCSI+IDE

Ivan Voras wrote on Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:39:18PM +0100: > For some funny reasons, I'll probably have to setup a gmirror between a > SCSI disk device and a IDE one, and won't have much time for testing. So > I'm wondering did anyone do such a thing and are there any caveats. It is just operat

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:45:09PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > FreeBSD releases new .ISO images several times a year, but you've got the > tools to make .ISO images of patch releases yourself, if you want to. I > don't think that the FreeBSD project can shorten the release cycle below a > mont

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:30:41PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > This statement makes no sense. The core team wouldn't have much to > do with this other than possibly being involved in making any service > official. Also, approval is never given to include a non-existent > feature. Easy, binary u

Re: cdboot troubles; 6.0 kernel hanging

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > I have this box that apparently no longer likes FreeBSD's cdboot, > it prints something about BOOT/LOADER and then just reboots. > Any ideas how to debug something like that? The box already has > FreeBSD installed (5.3 with some patc

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

Jo Rhett wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:55:03PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: YMMV. I burned a 6.0 release from the ISO image, and did a binary upgrade on an IBM ThinkPad (T.34? maybe), which worked perfectly. All of the 5.x binaries, including X11, KDE, printing, Mozilla, etc worked just fine

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:10:19PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:08:07PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > So, when will you fix it? Or hire someone to fix it? FreeBSD after > > all is mostly a volunteer operation. > > I and many others have offered to work on this. The core

Re: FreeBSD Update is the binary update solution [Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006]

On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:19:25PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > FreeBSD Update was written by, and is continuously maintained by the > actual FreeBSD Security Officer. It's as official as it gets. If > the only barrier to acceptance is that it's not distributed from the > FreeBSD.org domain, then a

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:35:34PM +0100, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote: > I agree. And after all, tracking a security branch isn't too difficult, > but the most people think that they have to do a complete "make > buildworld" after a security advisory, but this isn't true. For example > there was that

Anyone use any si(4) cards?

Does anyone have any si(4) cards that they use? I'm curious because 1) I'd like to know if the si(4) driver works on HEAD, and 2) there is updated firmware for the SIJET cards I'd like someone to test. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:08:07PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > So, when will you fix it? Or hire someone to fix it? FreeBSD after > all is mostly a volunteer operation. I and many others have offered to work on this. The core team has repeatedly stated that they won't integrate the efforts, wh

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:00:21PM -0800 I heard the voice of > Joe Rhett, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > Increasing the number of deployed systems out of date [...] On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:37:25PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > This doesn't make any sense. If you install a 6.0 system,

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

> On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:55:33AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Doesn't creating a binary updates system that's going to be practical to use > > require implementation of that old and exceedingly bikesheddable subject: > > packaging > > up the base system? On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 12:13:09PM

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:55:33AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Doesn't creating a binary updates system that's going to be practical to use > require implementation of that old and exceedingly bikesheddable subject: > packaging up the base system? EXACTLY. That's why we need core team suppo

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:05AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > > There will be three FreeBSD 6 releases in 2006. > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:00:21PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote: > > While this is nice, may I suggest that it is time to put aside/delay one > > release cycle and come up with a binar

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:55:03PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > YMMV. I burned a 6.0 release from the ISO image, and did a binary upgrade on > an > IBM ThinkPad (T.34? maybe), which worked perfectly. All of the 5.x binaries, > including X11, KDE, printing, Mozilla, etc worked just fine. There a

Re: HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

John-Mark Gurney wrote: Also, how will this effect cups which installs a .sample file? and any other port that does this? Brooks already answered the first part of your question, so I'll just add here that .sample is already being ignored, along with a few other extensions, but it's safer a

Re: HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:45:06AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Doug Barton wrote this message on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:50 -0800: > > I should have said this in my last heads up message, sorry for forgetting > > about this important detail. The new code tries to run any script in a > > loca

Re: HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

Doug Barton wrote this message on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:50 -0800: > I should have said this in my last heads up message, sorry for forgetting > about this important detail. The new code tries to run any script in a > local_startup directory (by default /usr/local/etc/rc.d and > /usr/X11R6/etc/

RE: FreeBSD 6.0 as storage server with raid5?

Joseph Kerian wrote: > Hmm... I have to ask if you (or anyone else) has actually done this. > I attempted to run two Highpoint cards in the same machine about a > year ago, and the Highpoint driver became extremely confused. They > were nowhere near the same card (one was IDE, the other was a 164

Re: em bad performance

On 12/22/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > D> > D> > D> Server listening on TCP port

Re: panic with RELENG_6, 2005-11-09 source

Rory Arms wrote: I'm not subscribed to the list, so include me in any replies. Now the report... I'm reporting a kernel panic with a 6.0-STABLE machine using RELENG_6 source from 2006-11-09. It was triggered when I ran the command "ifconfig ath0 pureg" as an attempt to switch the D-Link G5

Re: Bug[?] In new local_startup and postgresql

2005/12/22, Gary Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have the same problem the error on startup is: > pg_ctl: unrecognized operation mode "faststart" > try "pg_ctl --help" for more information Same for me. Look at doug's reply: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-December/028298.htm

Re: FreeBSD 6.0 as storage server with raid5?

On 12/13/05, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the late reply ... > > Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Highpoint RocketRAID 1640(4 ports) > > Promise FastTrak S150 SX4(4 ports) > > Promise FastTrak S150 SX4-M(4 ports) > > Highpoint RocketRAID 1810A

Re: Bug[?] In new local_startup and postgresql

> After a today upgrade to 6-STABLE postgresql doesn't start at boot. > Strange beavior, if I run `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/010.pgsql.sh start' it > starts correctly. > 010.pgsql.sh is the same of updated ports. > > This is 010.pgsql.sh : > http://www.deana.it/010.pgsql.sh > > Doug, this is resuls o

Re: lsof on 6.0

On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:27, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > > Do you have a mount which is a symlink? > > > > > > no, but many nfs. > > > minbari> mount > > > 132.65.16.100:/d/6 on / (nfs) > Breakpoint 1 at 0x402779: file dmnt.c, line 159. > (gdb) run > Starting program: > /home/pobj/r+d/ports

Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode

I have updated kernel/world today on the system which was running without any problems since I installed it (old kernel is from November 28) and i got this panic 10 minutes after boot (dmesg is attached below). The system is running FreeBSD/amd64 6-STABLE, SMP. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/obj/usr/src

Re: lsof on 6.0

> On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:51, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > i keep getting: > > > > > > lsof: can't determine user

Re: gmirror SCSI+IDE

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: For some funny reasons, I'll probably have to setup a gmirror between a SCSI disk device and a IDE one, and won't have much time for testing. So Might have bad performance, who kn

Re: lsof on 6.0

On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:51, Danny Braniss wrote: > > On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 > > > > > > > > Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > i keep getting: > > > > > lsof: can't determine user device rando

Re: lsof on 6.0

> On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 > > > > > > Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i keep getting: > > > > lsof: can't determine user device random seed. > > > > is it only me? > > > > both as a normal user and a

Re: lsof on 6.0

On Thursday 22 December 2005 12:36, Danny Braniss wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 > > > > Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i keep getting: > > > lsof: can't determine user device random seed. > > > is it only me? > > both as a normal user and as root. > > I don't see

Re: gvinum: adding plex and subdisks to existing volume panic

>Unfortunately, that doesn't help me at all, since there's no debugging >info. Have a look at >. sorry I realized it late... Here is the info: Script started on Thu Dec 22 12:25:56 2005 501 gw|/var/cra

Re: lsof on 6.0

On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:36:40 +0200 Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > shuttle-3> lsof -v lsof version information: I forgot that one, here it is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lsof -v lsof version information: revision: 4.77 latest revision: ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/

Re: lsof on 6.0

> On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 > Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i keep getting: > > lsof: can't determine user device random seed. > > is it only me? > > You'll have to be more specific: do you get that by doing only 'lsof' or > are you using any parameters? _Do you run

Re: em bad performance

> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > D> > D> > D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 > D> > D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) >

Re: lsof on 6.0

On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:12:17 +0200 Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i keep getting: > lsof: can't determine user device random seed. > is it only me? You'll have to be more specific: do you get that by doing only 'lsof' or are you using any parameters? _Do you run as a normal user

Re: em bad performance

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> > D> D> > D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 D> > D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D> > D> ---

Re: panic with RELENG_6, 2005-11-09 source

On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Rory Arms wrote: > I'm not subscribed to the list, so include me in any replies. So that explains the spam I get via this list... It's a spam magnet. -- Dave ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mai

Re: em bad performance

> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 > D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) > D> > D> [ 4] local 132

Re: em bad performance

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D> D> [ 4] local 132.65.16.100 p

Re: em bad performance

> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D>this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > D> one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > D> a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > D> > D> the em performance un

panic with RELENG_6, 2005-11-09 source

I'm not subscribed to the list, so include me in any replies. Now the report... I'm reporting a kernel panic with a 6.0-STABLE machine using RELENG_6 source from 2006-11-09. It was triggered when I ran the command "ifconfig ath0 pureg" as an attempt to switch the D-Link G520 running in host

HEADS UP: Please clean out your */etc/rc.d directories

I should have said this in my last heads up message, sorry for forgetting about this important detail. The new code tries to run any script in a local_startup directory (by default /usr/local/etc/rc.d and /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d) that has the execute bit set. So, if there is a script in one of thos

PANIC (g_vfs_done()) on RELENG_6

Hello, the following error occured on my new RELENG_6 server from yesterday: gune:/#34: cpdup -X .cvsjail -X INTERN -X PUBLIC /server/ /mnt/ ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=75285888 ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=75290368 ad4: detached unknown: TIMEOUT -

Re: em bad performance

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, D> one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is D> a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). D> D> the em performance under 6.0-st

Re: em bad performance

> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > hi, > > this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > > one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > > a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > > > > the em performanc

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

As a FreeBSD-n00b with some 'friends' that know FreeBSD better/well I can only say Please add this kind of information to the Handbook Any addition to the handbook on tracking down problems and smarter ways to fix things would be greatly appreciated. I found myself recompiling my kernel to test c

Re: HEADS UP: MFC of local_startup changes to rc.d complete

Greg Rivers wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Doug Barton wrote: As has been discussed for a couple weeks now, I have MFC'ed to RELENG_6 the changes in /etc/rc* that bring new-style boot scripts from the local_startup directories (by default /usr/local/etc/rc.d and /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d) into the bas

lsof on 6.0

i keep getting: lsof: can't determine user device random seed. is it only me? danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"